Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
📌 In brief
The Tribunal decided on a new rent of £1,250 per month for an assured periodic tenancy after considering comparable evidence and the condition of the property. The decision took into account minor damage and wear and tear.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a determination of a market rent for their assured periodic tenancy based on comparable evidence and the condition of the property.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant with an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their tenancy. The tribunal will then determine a new rent based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive for letting the property in the open market. This determination takes into account the condition of the property and comparable evidence.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined a new rent for an assured periodic tenancy based on comparable evidence and the condition of the property.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal determined a new rent of £1,250 per month for an assured periodic tenancy based on comparable evidence and the condition of the property, taking into account minor damage and wear and tear.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. HAV/00HG/MNR/2025/0759
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 12 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Judge C Skinner Regional Surveyor J Coupe FRICS Miss C Barton MRICS
Landlord [RESPONDENT] 22 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Tenant Mr [APPELLANT] and Ms [APPELLANT]
1. The rent is: £ 1,250.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 25 August 2025
3. The amount included for services is not applicable n/a Per n/a
4. Date assured tenancy commenced 25 October 2022
5. Length of the term or rental period Monthly
6. Allocation of liability for repairs Landlord
7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None
8. Description of premises 3 bedroom terraced house, 2 bathrooms, 2 living rooms, kitchen, rear courtyard
Chairman
Judge C Skinner
Date of Decision 9 October 2025
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2025
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : HAV/00HG/MNR/2025/0759 Property : 12 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE] Applicant Tenant : Mr [COUNSEL] & Ms [COUNSEL] :
Respondent Landlord : [RESPONDENT] :
Type of Application :
Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988
Tribunal Members : Judge C Skinner Regional Surveyor J Coupe FRICS Miss C Barton MRICS Date of Application : 24th August 2025 Date of Decision : 9th October 2025
DECISION
The Tribunal determines a rent of £1,250 per calendar month with effect from 25th August 2025.
HAV/00LC/MNR/2025/0759
SUMMARY REASONS
Background 1. On 1st July 2025 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £1,250 per month in place of the existing rent of £1,200 per month to take effect from 25th August 2025.
2. On 24th August 2025 under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent. The Tenant’s referral was received by the Tribunal on 24th August 2025. Inspection 3. The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case based on the papers provided by the parties and information freely available on the internet. Evidence
4. The Tribunal has considered the written submissions provided by the Tenant and the Landlord. Determination and Valuation 5. Having given consideration to the comparable evidence provided by the parties and of its own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, the Tribunal determines that the open market rent for the property in good tenantable condition would be £1,300 per calendar month.
6. Such a tenancy would normally include white goods, carpets, curtains/blinds and associated fittings to all be provided by the Landlord.
7. In this case, the evidence from the parties showed the property has suffered from minor fair “wear and tear” and so was not being let in such good condition. The Tribunal found that beyond fair wear and tear, the evidence showed the property was generally in good condition. The Tribunal noted there was minor damage to parts of the property including to the kitchen and bathroom units, a crack in the ceiling above the shower and a radiator in poor condition. The EPC rating is “E” referring to poor insulation.
Accordingly, the Tribunal determined that the ‘open market rent’ should be reduced by £50 per month to reflect the general wants of repair and condition.
8. The Tribunal therefore decided that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under the terms of this assured tenancy was £1,250 per month.
9. The Tenant made no representation that the starting date for the new rent specified in the Landlord’s notice would cause the Tenant undue hardship.
HAV/00LC/MNR/2025/0759
10. Accordingly, the Tribunal directed that the new rent of £1,250 per month should take effect from 24th August 2025, this being the date specified in the notice.
APPEAL PROVISIONS
These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any request for full reasons should be made within a month. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 11 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Reduces Rent Due to Property Defects
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent of £2,200 Per Month
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Market Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Determines Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Rent at £700 per Month for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Rent After Considering Tenant Improvements
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant disputes the rent with the landlord.
- The rent is set by a tribunal based on comparable evidence.
- Rent adjustments consider the specific conditions of the property.
- Tenants are entitled to a fair market rent for their property.
- Improvements made to the property can lead to a rent reduction.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal decided on a new rent of £1,250 per month for an assured periodic tenancy.
Who was involved?
The decision involved a tenant and a landlord.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on comparable evidence and the condition of the property, taking into account minor damage and wear and tear.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988 section 14 was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the condition of the property and comparable evidence.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation may also seek a determination of a market rent for their assured periodic tenancy.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Comparable evidence and the condition of the property were important.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, decisions like this can be appealed within a month of receiving the summary reasons.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is always recommended to get advice from a qualified solicitor for a case like this.
