VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Proposed Rent Based on Property Condition

Case No.

📌 In brief

In a tenancy dispute, the First-tier Tribunal adjusted a proposed rent from £1,800 to £1,300 per month after considering the property's condition, including damp, mould, and a below-standard kitchen.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair rent adjustment based on the property's condition.

Topics

tenancy disputesrent adjustment

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

This section allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the rent at which the property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal adjusted the proposed rent after considering the property's condition.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal adjusted a proposed rent of £1,800 to £1,300 per month for an assured periodic tenancy, considering the property's damp, mould, and below-standard kitchen condition.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00AY/MNR/2025/0874

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination or Section 22 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT]

Landlord Mrs [RESPONDENT] [NAME] 51 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant Ms [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £ 1,300 Per Cal Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 6 July 2025

3. The amount included for services is not applicable N/A Per

4. Date assured tenancy commenced 13 August 2024

5. Length of the term or rental period Monthly

6. Allocation of liability for repairs Landlord

7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord Furnished flat.

8. Description of premises Small 1 bed flat on first floor of period property.

[NAME] of Decision 27 October 2025

(c)

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : LON/00AY/MNR/2025/0874 Property : [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE] Tenant : Ms [APPELLANT] Landlord : Mrs [APPELLANT] [NAME] of Application : Section 13 Housing Act 1988 Tribunal Members : Mr [NAME] Mr [NAME] and venue of Consideration : 27 October 2025 – 10 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE] Date of Summary Reasons : 2 December 2025

_______________________________________________

DECISION

The Tribunal determines a rent of £1,300 per calendar month with effect from 6 July 2025. ____________________________________

SUMMARY REASONS

Background 1. On 2 June 2025 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £1,800 per month in place of the existing rent of £1,300 per month to take effect from 6 July 2025.

2 2. On 24 June 2025, under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent. The Tenant’s referral was received by the Tribunal on 27 June 2025. Inspection 3. The Tribunal has carried out an inspection of the property on 27 October 2025. Evidence 4. The Tribunal has consideration of the written submissions provided by the Tenant and the Landlord. Determination and Valuation 5. Having consideration of the evidence provided by the parties and of our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in good tenantable condition would be in the region of £1,700 per calendar month. From this level of rent, we have made adjustments in relation to: • Damp and mould at the property • The kitchen being below the standard that would be expected in the market • The general condition of the property otherwise 6. The full valuation is shown below: Market Rent £1,700.00 Per Month LESS 15% Damp and Mould -£255.00

LESS 2.5% Kitchen -£42.50

LESS 5% General Condition -£85.00

Total £1,317.50

SAY £1,300 Per Month

7. The Tribunal determines a rent of £1,300 per calendar month.

3 Decision 8. The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy was £1,300 per calendar month. 9. The Tribunal directs the new rent of £1,300 to take effect on 6 July 2025; This being the date as set out in the Landlord’s Notice of Increase.

Chairman: [NAME]: 2 December 2025

APPEAL PROVISIONS

These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any request for full reasons should be made within a month. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The Tribunal determined a rent of £1,300 per calendar month.
  • The property's damp and mould issues justified a 15% reduction from market rent.
  • The kitchen's substandard condition warranted a 2.5% rent reduction.
  • The general condition of the property led to a 5% reduction in rent.
  • The new rent of £1,300 will take effect from 6 July 2025.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • The landlord's proposed new rent of £1,800 per month was not accepted.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal adjusted the proposed rent from £1,800 to £1,300 per month.

Who was involved?

The tenant and landlord were involved in a rent adjustment dispute.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided to adjust the rent based on the property's condition, including damp, mould, and a below-standard kitchen.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 sections 13 and 14 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The property's condition, particularly damp, mould, and the below-standard kitchen, was the most important factor.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant who brought the case.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation may also seek a rent adjustment based on their property's condition.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Evidence of the property's condition, such as damp and mould, and the below-standard kitchen, was crucial.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed, but the process varies.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent adjustments.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.