VadeLab
AllowedEmployment Tribunal·england-and-wales·

Claimant Wins Compensation for Unpaid Wages and Holidays

Case No. 6027442/2025 · Judge A Johnson

📌 In brief

In this case, the Employment Tribunal found that the employer had made unlawful wage deductions and failed to provide proper notice or holiday pay to the employee. The tribunal awarded the claimant £5,662.26 in compensation.

⚖️ Legal holding

An employer must compensate an employee for unauthorised wage deductions, breaches of contract concerning notice periods, and unpaid holiday entitlements.

Topics

unauthorised wage deductionsbreach of contractholiday pay

📖 Technical summary

The Employment Tribunal ruled in favour of the claimant, awarding them compensation for unauthorised wage deductions, breach of contract regarding notice pay, and holiday pay.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Employment Tribunal ruled in favour of the claimant, awarding them £5,662.26 for unauthorised deductions from wages and holiday pay, as well as damages for breach of contract regarding notice pay.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

Case Number: 6027442/2025

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS

Claimant: [redacted]

Respondent: [redacted]

1. The claim was presented in the Manchester Employment Tribunal on 23rd July 2025. The respondent has failed to present a valid response on time. The Employment Judge has decided that a determination can properly be made of the claim, or part of it, in accordance with rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure.

Wages

2. The complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages is well-founded. The respondent made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages in the period 1st April 2025 to 30th April 2025.

3. The respondent shall pay the claimant £1,624.15 (one month’s pay) which is the net sum deducted.

Notice Pay

4. The complaint of breach of contract in relation to notice pay is well-founded.

5. The respondent shall pay the claimant £2,288.02 (£326.86 gross per week multiplied by 7 weeks) as damages for breach of contract. This figure has been calculated using gross pay to reflect the likelihood that the claimant will have to pay tax on it as Post Employment Notice Pay.

Holiday Pay

6. The complaint in respect of holiday pay is well-founded. The respondent made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages by failing to pay the claimant for holidays accrued but not taken on the date the claimant’s employment ended.

Case Number: 6027442/2025

7. The respondent shall pay the claimant £1,750.09 (19 days at £92.11 per day). The claimant is responsible for paying any tax or National Insurance.

8. The respondent must pay the claimant £5,662.26 in total.

Approved by: EJ A Johnson

Employment Judge Johnson

15th April 2026

JUDGMENT SENT TO THE PARTIES ON

3 June 2026

FOR THE TRIBUNAL OFFICE

Case Number: 6027442/2025

NOTICE

THE EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (INTEREST) ORDER 1990 ARTICLE 12

Case number: 6027442/2025

Name of case: [APPELLANT]

v [RESPONDENT] (Birmingham) [APPELLANT] is payable when an Employment Tribunal makes an award or determination requiring one party to proceedings to pay a sum of money to another party, apart from sums representing costs or expenses.

No interest is payable if the sum is paid in full within 14 days after the date the Tribunal sent the written record of the decision to the parties. The date the Tribunal sent the written record of the decision to the parties is called the relevant decision day.

Interest starts to accrue from the day immediately after the relevant decision day. That is called the calculation day.

The rate of interest payable is the rate specified in section 17 of the Judgments Act 1838 on the relevant decision day. This is known as the stipulated rate of interest.

The Secretary of the Tribunal is required to give you notice of the relevant decision day, the calculation day, and the stipulated rate of interest in your case. They are as follows:

the relevant decision day in this case is: 3 June 2026

the calculation day in this case is:

4 June 2026

the stipulated rate of interest is:

8% per annum.

For the Employment Tribunal Office

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • Employer made unauthorised wage deductions.
  • Employer breached contractual notice periods.
  • Employer failed to provide unpaid holiday entitlements.
  • Employer did not comply with statutory requirements for wages, notice periods, and holidays.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Employment Tribunal awarded the claimant £5,662.26 for unauthorised wage deductions, breaches of contract regarding notice pay, and unpaid holiday pay.

What was the dispute about?

The dispute was about unauthorised wage deductions, breaches of contract regarding notice pay, and unpaid holiday pay.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided in favour of the claimant because the employer had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and failed to provide proper notice pay and holiday pay.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Employment Rights Act 1996, Equality Act 2010, and Working Time Regulations 1998 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the claimant's argument that the employer had breached the contract by making unauthorised deductions from wages, failing to provide proper notice pay, and not paying for accrued but unused holiday pay.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the person who brought the case.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

This means that someone in a similar situation may also be entitled to compensation for unauthorised wage deductions, breaches of contract regarding notice pay, and unpaid holiday pay.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The judgment does not specify the evidence or documents that mattered.

Official source: Employment Tribunal — england-and-wales — headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the Employment Tribunal and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.