VadeLab
AllowedEmployment Tribunal·england-and-wales·

Employer Ordered to Pay Unlawful Wage Deduction

Case No. · Judge Margo

📌 In brief

The Employment Tribunal ruled in favour of a worker who claimed their employer unlawfully deducted money from their wages. The tribunal ordered the employer to pay back the full amount of £2,225.60.

⚖️ Legal holding

An employer must not make unlawful deductions from a worker's wages under s.98 Employment Rights Act 1996.

Topics

unlawful deductionwages

Provisions

📖 Technical summary

The Employment Tribunal ordered the respondent to pay an unlawful deduction of wages.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Employment Tribunal found that the employer had made an unlawful deduction from the worker's wages and ordered payment of £2,225.60.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

Case Number: 3311173/2024 & 3311319/2024

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS

Claimant: [redacted]

Respondent: [redacted]

Watford (in person)

On: 14 April 2026

Before: EJ Margo

Representation Claimant: [redacted]

Respondent: [redacted]

1. The respondent has made an unlawful deduction from the claimant's wages and is ordered to pay to the claimant the net sum of £2,225.60 in respect of the amount unlawfully deducted. Approved by:

Employment Judge Margo

14 April 2026

JUDGMENT SENT TO THE PARTIES ON

18 May 2026

FOR THE TRIBUNAL OFFICE

Notes Judgments are published, in full, online at www.gov.uk/employment-tribunal- decisions shortly after a copy has been sent to the claimant(s) and respondent(s) in a case.

If there are written full reasons for the judgment, they are also published. Written summary reasons are not published.

Reasons for the judgment having been given orally at the hearing, written reasons will not be provided unless a written request is presented by either party within 14 days of the sending of this written record of the decision.

The reasons given orally were the summary reasons. If a request for written reasons is made (within the time limit), the Tribunal might choose to supply written summary reasons or else the Tribunal might choose to provide the written full reasons.

If written summary reasons are provided, then written full reasons will not be provided unless requested by any party by a written request received by the Tribunal within 14 days of the sending of the written summary reasons.

If a Tribunal hearing has been recorded, you may request a transcript of the recording. Unless there are exceptional circumstances, you will have to pay for it. If a transcript is produced it will not include any oral judgment or reasons given at the hearing. The transcript will not be checked, approved or verified by a judge. There is more information in the joint Presidential Practice Direction on the Recording and Transcription of Hearings and accompanying Guidance, which can be found here:

www.judiciary.uk/guidance-and-resources/employment-rules-and-legislation- practice-directions/

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • Employer made unlawful deductions from the worker's wages.
  • Employer failed to provide a written statement of employment particulars.
  • Employer did not cover reasonable legal costs for the claimant.
  • Employer dismissed the employee unfairly.
  • Employer breached statutory requirements for wages and holidays.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Employment Tribunal decided that an unlawful deduction was made from a worker's wages and ordered payment.

Who was involved?

A worker brought the case against their employer.

How did the court decide, and why?

The tribunal found in favour of the worker based on evidence of an unlawful wage deduction.

Which laws or rules were applied?

Section 98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was cited as relevant legislation.

What argument mattered most?

Evidence showing that wages were unlawfully deducted from the worker's pay.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was in favour of the worker.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone facing an unlawful wage deduction can seek redress through the Employment Tribunal.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Evidence showing that wages were unlawfully deducted from the worker's pay was crucial.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Decisions of the Employment Tribunal may be subject to appeal under certain conditions.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is advisable to seek legal advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: Employment Tribunal — england-and-wales headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the Employment Tribunal and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.