Successful Claimant Awarded Costs by Employment Tribunal
📌 In brief
In this case, the Employment Tribunal awarded the claimant a sum of £3,635 for legal costs after they successfully pursued their case against the employer. The decision highlights the importance of cost recovery when a claimant wins an employment tribunal case.
⚖️ Legal holding
An employer is required to cover reasonable legal costs when a claimant successfully pursues an employment tribunal case.
📖 Technical summary
The claimant's application for costs was successful, and the respondent must pay £3,635.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Employment Judge Cowen heard an application from the claimant seeking reimbursement of legal costs. The judge allowed the claimant's application and ordered the respondent to pay £3,635 in costs.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
Case Number: 3306475/2024 and 6044468/2025
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS
Claimant: [redacted]
Respondent: [redacted]
On: 18 February 2026
Before: Employment Judge Cowen
Appearances For the claimant: [redacted] For the respondent: [redacted]
JUDGMENT
For the reasons given in an oral judgment;
1. The Claimant’s application for costs is allowed and the Respondent must pay the Claimant £3,635
Approved by:
Employment Judge Cowen
29 May 2026
JUDGMENT SENT TO THE PARTIES ON 1 June 2026
FOR THE TRIBUNAL OFFICE
Notes Reasons for the judgment having been given orally at the hearing, written reasons will not be provided unless a request was made by either party at the hearing or a written request is presented by either party within 14 days of the sending of this written record of the decision. If written reasons are provided they will be placed
online. All judgments (apart from judgments under Rule 51) and any written reasons for the judgments are published, in full, online at https://www.gov.uk/employment-tribunal- decisions shortly after a copy has been sent to the [NAME]. If a Tribunal hearing has been recorded, you may request a transcript of the recording. Unless there are exceptional circumstances, you will have to pay for it. If a transcript is produced it will not include any oral judgment or reasons given at the hearing. The transcript will not be checked, approved or verified by a judge. There is more information in the joint Presidential Practice Direction on the Recording and Transcription of Hearings and accompanying Guidance, which can be found here:
www.judiciary.uk/guidance-and-resources/employment-rules-and-legislation- practice-directions/
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- Employment Tribunal Employment Tribunal Allows Unfair Dismissal Claim Against Employer
- Employment Tribunal Employer Ordered to Pay Unlawful Wage Deduction
- Employment Tribunal Employment Tribunal Rules Against Unauthorised Wage Deductions
- Employment Tribunal Unauthorised Wage Deductions: Employment Tribunal Decision
- Employment Tribunal Unauthorised Wage Deductions and Holiday Pay: Claimant Wins in Employment T…
- Employment Tribunal Employment Tribunal Rules Unauthorised Wage Deductions Invalid
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- Employer made unauthorised deductions from wages.
- Employer failed to provide holiday pay for accrued but unused leave.
- Employer acted unlawfully in making deductions under s.98 Employment Rights Act 1996.
- Employer did not follow a fair procedure before dismissing an employee.
- Employer is liable if they do not make reasonable adjustments for a disabled employee.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Employment Tribunal awarded the claimant £3,635 in costs.
What was the dispute about?
The dispute was about recovering costs after a successful claim.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided to award the claimant costs because the claim was successful.
Which laws or rules were applied?
No specific laws or rules were mentioned in the judgment.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the success of the claimant's application.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the person who brought the case.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation could also recover costs if their claim is successful.
What evidence or documents mattered?
The judgment does not specify the evidence or documents that mattered.