Fair Rent Determination for a Birmingham Property
📌 In brief
The Tribunal decided on a fair rent for a property in Birmingham, considering factors such as the property's condition and the scarcity of similar properties in the area.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a fair rent that reflects the market conditions and the state of the property.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined a fair rent for a property taking into account various factors including the property's condition and scarcity of similar properties.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal determined a fair rent for a property, taking into account the property's condition, scarcity of similar properties, and market conditions. The decision was made by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber).
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
FR24 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. BIR/00CN/F77/2021/0013
Notice of the Tribunal Decision
Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 8 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
[NAME] (Hons) FRICS Mrs [RESPONDENT] [NAME]
Landlord [COMPANY]
Tenant Mr [APPELLANT]
1. The fair rent is £100.00 Per Week (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)
2. The effective date is 08 April 2021
3. The amount for services is £8.11 Per Week
4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is 0.00 Per
not applicable
5. The rent is not to be registered as variable.
6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf)
7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry
8. For information only:
The fair rent to be registered is not limited by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999, because it is below the maximum fair rent of £103.61 per week including £8.11 per week for services prescribed by the Order.
[NAME] (Hons) FRICS Date of decision 8 April 2021
FR24 MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION
LATEST RPI FIGURE X 296
PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 285.1
X 296 Minus Y 285.1 = (A) 10.9
(A) 10.9 Divided by Y 285.1 = (B) 0.[PHONE]
First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 NO
If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C) 1.05
If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.[PHONE]
Last registered rent* £87.75 Multiplied by (C) = £95.49 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)
Rounded up to nearest 50p = £95.50
Variable service charge YES If YES add amount for services £8.11
MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £103.61 Per week
Explanatory Note
1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.
2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:
(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and
(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).
A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).
The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.
3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.
4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.
© CROWN COPYRIGHT
Case Reference : BIR/00CN/F77/2021/0013
HMCTS (paper, video : P: PAPERREMOTE audio)
Property : 8 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Landlord : [COMPANY]
Tenant : Mr [APPELLANT] of Application : An application under section 70 of the Rent Act against the Fair Rent assessed for the Property by the Rent Officer
Tribunal Member : V [NAME] [NAME] of Decision : 8 April 2021
Date of Statement : 22 April 2021 Of Reasons
_____________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF REASONS _____________________________________________________
FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
Page 2 of 5
BACKGROUND
1. On 1 February 2021, the Rent Officer registered a rental of £100.00 per week including £5.01 per week in respect of the Property, effective from 20 January 2021. The rent prior to this registration was £96.00 per week including £8.25 per week which was set by a Tribunal on 11 March 2019.
2. It should be noted that the rent including service charge that the Tenant was actually being charged by the Landlord prior to the registration was £86.00 per week. The Landlord sought to increase this to £90.69 per week including £8.11 service charges with effect from 5 April 2021.
3. By a letter dated 15 February 2021, the Tenant objected to the rent of £100.00 per week including service charges of £5.01 per week determined by the Rent Officer and the matter was referred to the Tribunal.
4. The fair rent determined by the Tribunal for the purposes of Section 70 was £100.00 per week including service charges of £8.11 per week with effect from 8 April 2021.
5. On 16 April 2021, the Tenant requested that the Tribunal provide reasons for its decision.
THE PROPERTY
6. Due to the Covid-19 Public Health Emergency, the Tribunal were unable to carry out an inspection of the Property.
7. From the information provided by the parties and web based sources available to the Tribunal, the Property appears to be a first floor flat in a relatively modern development situated on the fringe of Birmingham City Centre.
8. The accommodation comprises the following:
Living room, kitchen, bedroom and bathroom
9. The Property benefits from central heating, double glazing and off-street permit controlled parking.
Submissions of the Parties
10. Neither party requested an oral hearing.
Page 3 of 5
11. The Tenant provided a statement and photographs which indicated that the car park was generally in poor condition and more specifically damage to the barrier to the same. Mr [NAME] said that the there was little maintenance of the car park with the tarmac surface damaging his car tyres. There were also indications of rat infestation to the car park. An element of the service charge was for management fees which Mr [NAME] disputed the need for.
12. The Tribunal was provided with a copy of the Annual Service Charge Estimate for the Property for the period 1 April 2021 to 31 March 2022. This charge covers a variety of items principally relating to the maintenance of the communal areas of the development in which the Property is situated, including amounts for car park, barrier maintenance, management and pest control.
13. The Landlord made no submissions.
THE LAW
14. When determining a fair rent, the Tribunal, in accordance with the Rent Act 1977, Section 70, had regard to all the circumstances including the age, location and state of repair of the property. It also disregarded the effect of (a) any relevant Tenant’s improvements and (b) the effect of any disrepair or other defect attributable to the Tenant or any predecessor in title under the Regulated Tenancy, on the rental value of the property.
15. In [COMPANY] v Chairman of the Greater Manchester, etc. Committee [1995] 28HLR107 and [NAME] v [NAME] [1999] QB92 the Court of Appeal emphasised (a) that ordinarily a fair rent is the market rent for the property discounted for ‘scarcity’ (i.e. that element, if any, of the market rent, that is attributable to there being a significant shortage of similar properties in the wider locality available for letting on similar terms – other than as to rent – to that of the regulated tenancy) and (b) that for the purposes of determining the market rent assured tenancy (market) rents were usually appropriate comparables. (These rents may have to be adjusted where necessary to reflect any relevant differences between those comparables and the subject property).
VALUATION
16. In the first instance, the Tribunal determined what rent the Landlord could reasonably expect to obtain for the Property in the open market if it were let today in the condition that is considered usual for such open market lettings. It did this from its own general knowledge of market rent levels in the central Birmingham area and by considering the evidence provided within the representations. Having done so, it concluded that such a likely market rent would be approximately £155.00 per week including any service charges. However, as the
Page 4 of 5
Property is not in the same condition as properties in the general market, the Tribunal made a deduction of £17.00 per week to reflect this.
17. The Tribunal, noting the comments by the Tenant in relation to the poor condition of the car park, the lack of maintenance and rodent problems, made a further deduction of £10.00 per week.
18. A further deduction of £16.90 per week was made to allow for the Tenant’s fittings (floor coverings, curtains and white goods) and decorating liability.
19. The Tribunal then considered the question of scarcity. This was done by considering whether the number of persons genuinely seeking to become tenants of similar properties in the wider area of the West Midlands on the same terms other than rent is substantially greater than the availability of such dwellings as required by section 70(2) of the Rent Act 1977.
20. The Tribunal finds that many landlords dispute that scarcity exists because they are of the opinion that the market is ‘in balance’. Although tenants do not in all cases have difficulty in finding accommodation, this ignores the fact that it is the price of such accommodation which creates a balance in the market. Section 70(2) specifically excludes the price of accommodation from consideration in determining whether there are more persons genuinely seeking to become tenants of similar properties than there are properties available. Although the rental market for Assured Shorthold properties may be in balance, many potential tenants may be excluded from it for various reasons such as age, poor credit history or because they are on housing benefit.
21. The Tribunal found that there was scarcity and, accordingly, made a further deduction of £11.10 per week.
22. The Tribunal determined that the fair rent for the Property was therefore £100.00 per week including service charges of £8.11 per week which confirms the amount registered by the Rent Officer.
23. The maximum fair rent permitted by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 is £103.61 per week including service charges of £8.11 per week. The level of rent determined by the Tribunal is therefore not limited by the Order. Details of the maximum fair rent calculation were provided with the decision.
DECISION
24. The fair rent determined by the Tribunal for the purposes of Section 70 was, therefore, £100.00 per week including service charges of £8.11 per week with effect from 8 April 2021.
Page 5 of 5
25. In reaching its determination, the Tribunal had regard to the evidence and submissions of the parties, the relevant law and their own knowledge and experience as an expert Tribunal but not any special or secret knowledge.
APPEAL
26. If either party is dissatisfied with this decision, they may apply for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) on any point of law arising from this Decision. Prior to making such an appeal, an application must be made, in writing, to this Tribunal for permission to appeal. Any such application must be made within 28 days of the issue of this decision (regulation 52 (2) of The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rule 2013) stating the grounds upon which it is intended to rely in the appeal.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Protected Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Property Considering Market Conditions
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Fair Rent Determination for Property Condition and Scarcity
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Central London Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Adjusts Fair Rent for Tenancy Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Regulated Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent Under Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Property Considering Market Conditio…
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant is entitled to a fair rent reflecting current market conditions.
- The fair rent is adjusted based on the property's condition and local scarcity.
- The calculation includes factors such as inflation and the Retail Price Index.
- The fair rent is determined according to the Rent Act 1977 and relevant orders.
- The fair rent is capped by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- No significant factors identified that went against the claimant in these cases.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal set a fair rent of £100.00 per week including service charges of £8.11 per week.
Who was involved?
The decision involved a tenant and a landlord.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the property's condition, scarcity of similar properties, and market conditions.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Rent Act 1977 and related sections were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the scarcity of similar properties in the area.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was in favour of the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation might also seek a fair rent determination based on current market conditions and property scarcity.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Photographs and statements from the tenant regarding the property's condition were important.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, either party can apply for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) on any point of law arising from this decision.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving fair rent determinations.
