First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Property Considering Market Conditions
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal decided on a fair rent for a property by considering the current market conditions, the state of the property, and the scarcity of similar properties in the area. The decision was influenced by the Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a fair rent that reflects the market conditions and the state of the property.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined a fair rent for a property taking into account various factors including the condition of the property and scarcity of similar properties in the area.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal determined a fair rent for a property taking into account the market conditions, the state of the property, and the scarcity of similar properties in the area. The decision was based on the Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
FR24 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. TR/LON/00AN/F77/2024/0017
Notice of the Tribunal Decision
Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 4a [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
[NAME] [NAME]
Landlord [APPELLANT]
Tenant Mr [APPELLANT] & Mrs [APPELLANT]
1. The fair rent is £840.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)
2. The effective date is 19th March 2024
3. The amount for services is
Per
Negligible
4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is
0.00 Per
Not applicable
5. The rent is not to be registered as variable.
6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf).
7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry
8. For information only:
(a) The fair rent to be registered is not limited by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999, because it is the same as/below the maximum fair rent of £1034 per month.
[NAME] [NAME] of decision 19th March 2024
FR24 MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION
LATEST RPI FIGURE X 378
PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 307.4
X 378 Minus Y 307.4 = (A) 70.6
(A) 70.6 Divided by Y 307.4 = (B) 0.23
First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 YES/NO
If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C) 1.305
If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C)
Last registered rent* 792 Multiplied by (C) = 1033,56 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)
Rounded up to nearest 50p = 1034.00
Variable service charge NO If YES add amount for services
MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £1034 Per Month
Explanatory Note
1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.
2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:
(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and
(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).
A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).
The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.
3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.
4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.
1
Case Reference
: LON/00AN/F77/2024/0017
Property : 4A [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Tenant
: [NAME] [APPELLANT]. [APPELLANT]
Landlord : [APPELLANT] of Objection : 6 December 2023
Type of Application : Section 70, Rent Act 1977
Tribunal
: Mr [NAME] [NAME] of Summary Reasons
: 19 March 2024
_______________________________________________
DECISION
The sum of £840 per calendar month will be registered as the fair rent with effect from 19 March 2024, being the date the Tribunal made the Decision. ____________________________________
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023
FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
2
SUMMARY REASONS
Background 1. Following an objection from the Landlord to the determination of a fair rent by the Rent Officer, the Tribunal has made a determination under the provisions of the Rent Act 1977.
Inspection 2. The Tribunal inspected the property on the 19 March 2024 in the presence of the Tenants and a family friend.
Evidence 3. A hearing took place at 10.15am on the 19 March 2024 which was attended by the Landlord and her husband Mr [RESPONDENT]. The Landlord lives in the adjoining property No [ADDRESS]. The Tribunal has consideration of the comprehensive evidence provided by the Landlord which included calculations with a clear methodology and comparable evidence of two flats rented out by them in the same building, being 4B and 4C, located on the second floor. The current passing rent for these properties is £2100 and £2300 respectively. The Tenants provided a completed Reply Form with submissions in connection with the condition of the property and lack of natural light to the kitchen and living room following refurbishment and extension works undertaken by the Landlord in approximately 2019.
Determination and Valuation 4. Having consideration of our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the Fulham Broadway area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in its current condition would be in the region of £2100 per calendar month. From this level of rent we have made adjustments in relation to:
Terms of tenancy, no white goods, no carpets or curtains, dated kitchen and bathroom fittings, no central heating, defective windows and a lack of natural lighting and which equates to approximately 50%
5. The Tribunal has also made an adjustment for scarcity at 20%
6. The full valuation is shown below:
Market Rent £2100 pm
Less
approx. 50% £1050
£1050
3 Less Scarcity
approx. 20%
£210
£840
7. The Tribunal determines a rent of £840 per calendar month
Decision
8. The uncapped fair rent initially determined by the Tribunal, for the purposes of section 70, was £840 per calendar month. The capped rent for the property according to the provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 is calculated at £1034 per calendar month. The calculation of the capped rent is shown on the decision form. In this case the lower rent of £840 per calendar month is to be registered as the fair rent or this property.
[NAME]: [NAME]: 19 March 2024
APPEAL PROVISIONS
These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA
© CROWN COPYRIGHT
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case reference : LON/00AN/F77/2024/0017 Property : 4A [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Applicants (Landlord) : [COUNSEL] : None Respondent (Tenant) : Mr and [COUNSEL]. [COUNSEL] : None Type of application : Section 70 of the Rent ACT 1977 Tribunal members :
Mr [NAME] [NAME] of Reasons : 29th April 2024
Reasons
2
The Tribunal determines £840 per month is to be registered as the fair rent for the above property with effect from 19th March 2024 being the date of the Tribunal's decision.
This decision was notified to the parties following the decision. On the 3rd April 2024 the Tribunal received a request from Landlord to provide extended reasons. The Tribunal have therefore set out below full reasons for their decision prior to any application either party wishes to pursue for permission to appeal.
Reasons
Background
On 4th September 2023 the landlord, applied to the Valuation Office Agency (Rent Officer) for registration of a fair rent of £1,092 per month (inclusive of a service charge of £77.00 per month)
The rent payable at the time of the application was £792 per month, inclusive of service charge of £66.66 per month effective from 17 November 2021.
On 15 November 2023 the Rent Officer registered a fair rent of £630 per month, inclusive of a service charge of £64.53 per month effective from the 17 November 2023. The rent increase imposed by the Rent Officer had not been “capped” or limited by the operation of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 (the Order).
By a letter dated 6 December 2023 from Mr [RESPONDENT], the Landlord objected to the rent determined by the Rent Officer and the matter was referred to this Tribunal.
The law
When determining a fair rent the Tribunal, in accordance with the Rent Act 1977, section 70, must have regard to all the circumstances including the age, location and state of repair of the property. It also must disregard the effect of (a) any relevant tenant's improvements and (b) the effect of any disrepair or other defect attributable to the tenant, on the rental value of the property. Section 70(2) of the Rent Act 1977 imposes on the Tribunal an assumption that the number of persons seeking to become tenants of similar dwelling house in the locality on the terms (other than those relating to rent) of the regulated tenancy is not substantially greater than the number of such dwelling houses in the locality which are available for letting on such terms. This is commonly called ‘scarcity’.
[COMPANY] v [NAME] of the Greater Manchester Council (1995) 28 HLR 107 and [NAME] v [NAME] Tribunal [1999] QB 92 the Court of Appeal emphasised
3
(a) that ordinarily a fair rent is the market rent for the property discounted for 'scarcity' (i.e. that element, if any, of the market rent, that is attributable to there being a significant shortage of similar properties in the wider locality available for letting on similar terms - other than as to rent - to that of the regulated tenancy) and
(b) that for the purposes of determining the market rent, assured tenancy (market) rents are usually appropriate comparables. (These rents may have to be adjusted where necessary to reflect any relevant differences between those comparables and the subject property).
The Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 places a “cap” on the permissible amount of the increase of a fair rent between one registration and the next, by reference to the amount of the increase in the United Kingdom Index of Retail Prices between the dates of the two registrations. Where the cap applies the Rent Officer and the Tribunal is prevented from increasing the amount of the fair rent that it registers beyond the maximum fair rent calculated in accordance with the provisions of the Order and the mathematical formula set out in the Order. By article 2(7) of the 1999 Order the capping provisions do not apply “in respect of a dwelling-house if because of a change in the condition of the dwelling- house or the common parts as a result of repairs or improvements (including the replacement of any fixture or fitting) carried out by the landlord or a [NAME], the rent that is determined in response to an application for registration of a new rent under Part IV exceeds by at least 15% the previous rent registered or confirmed.” Hearing and Inspection It had been agreed with the parties in advance that there would be a hearing held at 10 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE], to be followed by an inspection of the premises later in the day. The Hearing A hearing took place at 10.15am on the 19 March 2024 which was attended by the Landlord and her husband Mr [RESPONDENT]. The Landlord lives in the adjoining property No [ADDRESS]. The Tribunal has consideration of the comprehensive evidence provided by the Landlord which included calculations with a clear methodology and comparable evidence of two flats rented out by them in the same building, being 4B and 4C, located on the second floor. The current passing rent for these properties is £2100 and £2300 respectively.
Facts found with Inspection.
4 The Tribunal inspected the property on the 19 March 2024 in the presence of the Tenants and a family friend.
The property is a converted lower ground floor flat which forms part of a Victorian five storey (including lower ground floor) semi-detached building with brick and stucco elevations with a loft conversion.
The property is located in an established road close to local amenities in Fulham Broadway.
The accommodation comprises: living room, kitchen, bedroom, shower room, lavatory and cellar. Outside, there is a small courtyard garden.
Terms of the tenancy
The Tribunal issued Directions on the 26 January 2024 which set out a timescale for the proceedings. The Landlord’s Application for Registration of Fair Rent states the agreement commenced in 1961, but no agreement was submitted. It is assumed such an agreement made the landlord responsible for structural repairs and external decorations. The tenant is responsible for internal decorations. It is assumed the property was let unfurnished.
Condition of the Property
The property is in need of general refurbishment and modernisation. The windows are single glazed, poorly fitting and require redecoration. The bathroom and kitchen fittings are dated, and the cellar is damp. There is no central heating and insulation qualities are poor.
Written Evidence
The Tribunal had copies of the Valuation Office Agency correspondence including the previous rent registration together with the calculations for the most recent registration.
The tenant provided a completed Reply Form with submissions in connection with the condition of the property and lack of natural light to the kitchen and living room following refurbishment and extension works undertaken by the Landlord in approximately 2019.
Valuation
In the first instance the Tribunal determined what rent the landlord could reasonably be expected to obtain for the property in the open market if it were let today in the condition that is considered usual for such an open market letting.
Based upon the evidence provided by the Landlord together with its expert knowledge of the Fulham Broadway area, the Tribunal considers that the
5 subject property, if finished to a reasonable standard would be likely to attract a rent let on an assured shorthold tenancy, of £2,100 per month.
Next, the Tribunal needs to adjust that hypothetical rent of £2,100 per month to allow for the differences between the terms of this tenancy, the unmodernised condition, dated sanitary fittings and kitchen units, damp issues in the cellar, defective windows, no central heating, the lack of white goods, carpets and curtains, and the tenant’s decorating responsibilities (disregarding the effect of tenant’s improvements and any disrepair or other defect attributable to the tenant).
The Tribunal has considered very carefully the information prepared by the parties.
Using its own expertise, the Tribunal considers that a deduction of 50% should be applied in order to take into account the terms of the tenancy, the condition of the property and the lack of carpets, curtains and white goods. This provides a deduction of £1,050 per month from the hypothetical rent. This reduces the figure to £1,050 per month.
It should be noted that this figure cannot be a simple arithmetical calculation and is not based upon capital costs but is the Tribunal’s estimate of the amount by which the rent would need to be reduced to attract a tenant.
Scarcity
Thirdly, the Tribunal then went on to consider whether a deduction falls to be made to reflect scarcity within the meaning of section 70(2) of the 1977 Act. The tribunal followed the decision of the High Court in [COMPANY] v [NAME], in which it was held that scarcity over a wide area should be considered rather than scarcity in relation to a particular locality.
In the Tribunals opinion there should be a deduction of 20% for scarcity as it is considered demand outweighs supply of rented properties in the area. This provides a figure of £210 and therefore reduces the rent to £840 per month.
Conclusion
The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order do not apply and therefore the above figure applies. [Yes, the MFR does apply, but its calculation – which should be referred to here - demonstrates that the s70 rent is the one to be registered]Therefore, the fair rent to be registered is £840 per month. This includes a small amount for services, which do not affect the rent calculation and are therefore regarded as “negligible” for the purposes of recording them on the Notice of determination. In accordance with the statutory provisions, this takes effect from the 19 March 2024 being the date of the Tribunal’s decision.
6 Detailed calculations for the capped maximum fair rent are provided on the back of the decision form.
[NAME]
29th April 2024
RIGHTS OF APPEAL
1. A person wishing to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) must seek permission to do so by making written application by email to [EMAIL] to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case.
2. The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.
3. If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28 day time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.
4. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Central London Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Tenancy Based on Market Conditions
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent Under Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Fair Rent Determination for a Birmingham Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for London Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Property Considering Condition and S…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent Below Maximum Limit
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent Under Rent Act 1977
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant is entitled to a fair rent that reflects current market conditions.
- The tenant is entitled to a fair rent that considers the property's condition.
- The fair rent is determined using statutory formulas and the Retail Price Index.
- The fair rent is set by the Tribunal below the maximum prescribed by law.
- The fair rent takes into account the tenant's obligations and the scarcity of similar properties.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- (No factors identified that went against the claimant in the provided cases.)
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The First-tier Tribunal set a fair rent of £840 per month for a property.
Who was involved?
The decision involved a tenant and a landlord.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the current market conditions, the state of the property, and the scarcity of similar properties in the area.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the scarcity of similar properties in the area.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should consider the market conditions, the state of the property, and the scarcity of similar properties when negotiating a fair rent.
What evidence or documents mattered?
The evidence included comprehensive evidence provided by the landlord and submissions from the tenant regarding the condition of the property.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is always recommended to get advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving fair rent determinations.
