Fair Rent Determination for Regulated Tenancy Agreement
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal decided on a fair rent for a tenant's property, setting the rent at £680 per month. The decision took into account the property's condition and the scarcity of similar properties in the area.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a fair rent that reflects the market rent adjusted for the property's condition and scarcity.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined a fair rent for a property under a regulated tenancy agreement.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal determined a fair rent of £680 per month for a property under a regulated tenancy agreement, considering the property's condition and scarcity in the market.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00AY/F77/2022/0058
Notice of the Tribunal Decision
Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 83 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
[NAME]
Landlord [APPELLANT] & [COMPANY]
Tenant Ms C [RESPONDENT]
1. The fair rent is £680 Per month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)
2. The effective date is 5 July 2022
3. The amount for services is
Per
not applicable
4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is
Per
not applicable
5. The rent /is not to be registered as variable.
6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf).
7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry
8. For information only:
The fair rent to be registered is not limited by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999, because it is below the maximum fair rent of £809.50 per week prescribed by the Order.
Chairman E [NAME] of decision 5 July 2022
MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION
LATEST RPI FIGURE X 337.1
PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 290.6
X 337.1 Minus Y 290.6 = (A) 46.5
(A) 46.5 Divided by Y 290.6 = (B) 0.160013
First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 NO
If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C)
If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.210013
Last registered rent* £669 Multiplied by (C) = £809.50 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)
Rounded up to nearest 50p = £809.50
Variable service charge NO If YES add amount for services
MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £809.50 Per month
Explanatory Note
1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.
2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:
(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and
(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).
A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).
The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.
3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.
4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the
variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.
Case Reference : LON/00AY/F77/2022/0058
P:PAPERREMOTE
Property : 83 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Applicant: [redacted]
Respondent: [redacted] : 6 April 2022
Type of Application : Determination of the registered rent under Section 70 Rent Act 1977
Tribunal
: Mrs [NAME] and venue of : 5 July 2022 hearing
remote hearing on the papers
_______________________________________________
DECISION ____________________________________
The registered rent with effect from 5 July 2022 is £680 per month.
This has been a hearing on the papers which has been consented to by the parties. The form of remote hearing was P:PAPERREMOTE, a paper determination which is not provisional. A face to face hearing was not held because it was not practicable and all the issues could be determined on the papers. The documents that I was referred to are in a bundle, the contents of which I have recorded.
© CROWN COPYRIGHT FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
Background
1. On 24 November 2021 the landlord applied to the rent officer for registration of a fair rent of £769.35 per month for the above property.
2. The registered rent at the date of the application was £669 per month which had been registered by the rent officer on 9 January 2020 with effect from 4 February 2020.
3. On 7 January 2022, the rent officer registered a fair rent of £651 per month with effect from 14 February 2022.
4. On 26 January 2022 the landlord objected to the registered rent.
5. The tenant occupies under the terms of a tenancy agreement which commenced in October 1981.
6. Owing to the Covid 19 restrictions the parties were asked if they would consent to the application being dealt with on the papers. Neither party objected. Written representations were received from the tenant, no written representations were received from or on behalf of the landlord.
The Evidence
7. The accommodation which is on the first floor of a three storey semi-detached house is not self-contained. It comprises two rooms, kitchen, bathroom and wc, it is centrally heated. Ms [RESPONDENT] stated that there was water damage to the ceiling in the bay window in the living room due to water leaking from the balcony above. The window frames and cills were generally in poor condition and draughty. The windows are single glazed. The accommodation is expensive to heat. The carpets, curtains and white goods were supplied by the tenant.
The Law
8. When determining a fair rent the tribunal, in accordance with section 70 of the Rent Act 1977, must have regard to all the circumstances including the age, location and state of repair of the property. It also must disregard the effect if any of any relevant tenant’s improvements and the effect of any disrepair or any other defect attributable to the tenant or any predecessor in title under the regulated tenancy, on the rental value of the property.
9. In [COMPANY] v Chairman of the Greater Manchester etc Committee (1995) 28 HLR 107 and [NAME] v [NAME] (1999) QB 92 the Court of appeal emphasised:
That ordinarily a fair rent is the market rent for the property discounted for scarcity i.e. that element, if any, of the market rent, that is attributable to there being a significant shortage of similar properties in the wider locality available for letting on similar terms to that of a regulated tenancy, and
That for the purposes of determining the market rent, assured tenancy market rents are usually appropriate comparables; adjusted as necessary to reflect any relevant differences between the comparables and the subject property.
Valuation
10. In the first instance the Tribunal determined what rent the landlord could reasonably be expected to obtain for the property in the open market if it were let today in the condition that is considered usual for such an open market letting. The Tribunal relied on its own general knowledge of rental values in Streatham and concluded that the likely market rent for the property would be £1350 per month.
11. However, it was first necessary to adjust the hypothetical rent of £1350 per month to allow for the differences between the terms and condition considered usual for such a letting and the condition of the actual property at the valuation date, ignoring any tenant’s improvements, (disregarding the effect of any disrepair or other defect attributable to the tenant or any predecessor in title). The Tribunal noted that properties available on the open market were modern or modernised, with white goods, floor and window coverings. The Tribunal considered that these differences, the lack of self- containment and the terms and conditions of the tenancy required a deduction of £500 per month.
12. This leaves an adjusted market rent for the subject property of £850 per month. The Tribunal was of the opinion that there was substantial scarcity in London for similar properties and therefore made a deduction of 20% from the adjusted market rent to reflect this element. The Tribunal’s uncapped fair rent is £680 per month.
Decision
13. The uncapped fair rent initially determined by the Tribunal, for the purposes of section 70, was accordingly £680 per month which is below the maximum fair rent of £809.50 per month which can be charged under the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.
14. Accordingly, the sum of £680 per month will be registered as the fair rent with effect from 5 July 2022 being the date of the Tribunal's decision.
Chairman: [NAME]: 5 July 2022
ANNEX - RIGHTS OF APPEAL
i. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) then a written application for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case.
ii. The application for permission to appeal must arrive at the Regional office within 28 days after the Tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the person making the application.
iii. If the application is not made within the 28 day time limit, such application must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the Tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed despite not being within the time limit.
iv. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 11 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Fair Rent Determination Under Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Determines Fair Rent Under Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent of £308 Per Week
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Property Under Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal sets fair rent of £175 per week for property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Property Under Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Tenancy After Adjusting for Condition and Scarc…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent Under Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Tenancy Under Rent Act 1977
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The fair rent is calculated based on the Rent Act 1977.
- Adjustments for the property's condition and scarcity are considered.
- The Retail Price Index is taken into account during the calculation.
- The Tribunal uses the formula prescribed by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.
- The open market value is used as a basis for determining the fair rent.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- The maximum fair rent is capped according to the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
It set a fair rent of £680 per month for a property under a regulated tenancy agreement.
Who was involved?
A tenant and a landlord were involved in the dispute over the fair rent.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the property's condition and the scarcity of similar properties in the market.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the adjustment of the market rent based on the property's condition and scarcity.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant, setting a fair rent that reflects the property's condition and scarcity.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should consider the condition of their property and the scarcity of similar properties when disputing a fair rent.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Evidence regarding the property's condition and market comparables were important.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving fair rent determinations.
