VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Fair Rent Determination for Tenancy in London

Case No.

📌 In brief

The Tribunal decided on a fair rent for a property in London, setting the rent at £3072.00 per quarter. This decision was made under the Rent Act 1977, taking into account services and fuel charges.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair rent determination under the Rent Act 1977.

Topics

fair rent determinationRent Act 1977maximum fair rent

Provisions

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined a fair rent for a property under the Rent Act 1977.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined a fair rent of £3072.00 per quarter for a property in London under the Rent Act 1977, considering various factors including services and fuel charges.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

FR24 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. JM/LON/00AP/F77/2022/0012

Notice of the Tribunal Decision

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Judge Hargreaves Alison Flynn MA MRICS

Landlord [APPELLANT]

Tenant Mrs [APPELLANT]

1. The fair rent is 3072.00 Per Quarter (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)

2. The effective date is 04 April 2022

3. The amount for services is £118.04 Per Quarter

4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is

N/A Per

5. The rent is not to be registered as variable.

6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf)

7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry

N/A

8. For information only:

(a) The fair rent to be registered is not limited by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999, because it is below the maximum fair rent of £3234.50 per quarter including £118.04 per quarter for services (variable) prescribed by the Order.

Chairman Sara Hargreaves Date of decision 4th April 2022

FR24 MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION

LATEST RPI FIGURE X 320.2

PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 290.4

X 320.2 Minus Y 290.4 = (A) 29.8

(A) 29.8 Divided by Y 290.4 = (B) 0.102617

First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 NO

If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C)

If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.152617

Last registered rent* £2806 per quarter Multiplied by (C) = 3234.24 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)

Rounded up to nearest 50p = 3234.50

Variable service charge NO If YES add amount for services

MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £3234.50 Per Quarter

Explanatory Note

1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.

2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:

(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and

(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).

A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).

The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.

3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.

4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant is entitled to a fair rent determination under the Rent Act 1977.
  • The fair rent takes into account the property's condition and market value.
  • The fair rent is adjusted for the scarcity of similar properties.
  • The fair rent is calculated according to the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • The fair rent is subject to the Maximum Fair Rent Cap.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It set a fair rent of £3072.00 per quarter for a property in London.

Who was involved?

The decision involved a tenant and a landlord.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court used the Rent Act 1977 to determine a fair rent, considering factors like services and fuel charges.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Rent Act 1977 and its Schedule 11 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument focused on determining a fair rent under the Rent Act 1977.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation can seek a fair rent determination under the Rent Act 1977.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Evidence related to the property and rental conditions was considered.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to higher courts.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to consult a solicitor for legal advice on such matters.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.