VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on a fair rent for a property, setting it at £214 per week. They considered factors like the property's condition, market value, and the scarcity of similar properties in the area.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair rent that reflects the property's condition and market value, adjusted for scarcity.

Topics

fair rent determinationregulated tenancyscarcity adjustment

Provisions

Rent Act 1977Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined a fair rent for a property under the Rent Act 1977.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal determined a fair rent of £214 per week for a property, taking into account its condition, market value, and scarcity of similar properties in the area.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

FR27 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. FL/LON/00AL/F77/2024/0223

Notice of the Tribunal Decision

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 35 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME]

Landlord [APPELLANT]

Tenant Mr [APPELLANT]

1. The fair rent is £214 Per week (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)

2. The effective date is 24 September 2024

3. The amount for services is

Per

not applicable

4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is

Per

/not applicable

5. The rent is not to be registered as variable.

6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf).

7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry

8. For information only:

(a) .............................................................................................................. The fair rent to be registered is not limited by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999, because it is below the maximum fair rent of £ 248.50 per week prescribed by the Order.

Chairman E [NAME] of decision 24 September 2024

FR27 MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION

LATEST RPI FIGURE X 387.5

PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 320.2

X 387.5 Minus Y 320.2 = (A) 67.3

(A) 67.3 Divided by Y 320.2 = (B) 0.21018

First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 NO

If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C)

If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.26018

Last registered rent* £197 Multiplied by (C) = £248.26 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)

Rounded up to nearest 50p = £248.50

Variable service charge NO If YES add amount for services

MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £248.50 Per week

Explanatory Note

1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.

2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:

(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and

(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).

A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).

The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.

3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.

4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.

Case Reference : LON/00AL/F77/2024/0223

P:PAPERREMOTE

Property : 35 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Applicant: [redacted]

Respondent: [redacted] : 17 April 2024

Type of Application : Determination of the registered rent under Section 70 Rent Act 1977

Tribunal

: Mrs [NAME] and venue of : 24 september 2024 Hearing

remote on the papers

_______________________________________________

DECISION ____________________________________

This has been a hearing on the papers which has been consented to by the parties. A face to face hearing was not held because, no-one requested the same. The documents that I was referred to were in an electronic bundle the contents of which we have recorded. The registered rent with effect from 24 September 2024 is £214 per week.

© CROWN COPYRIGHT

FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

Background

1. On 19 February 2024 the landlord applied to the rent officer for registration of a fair rent of £950 per month for the above property.

2. The registered rent at the date of the application was £197 per week which had been registered by the rent officer on 8 February 2022 with effect from the same date.

3. On 9 April 2024, the rent officer registered a fair rent of £191.50 per week with effect from 9 April 2024.

4. The landlord objected to the registered rent on 17 April 2024.

5. The tribunal issued Directions on 16 July 2024. Written representations were received from both the landlord and the tenant and copied to the other party.

6. I have viewed the locality on streetview.

The Evidence

7. The property is a two storey terraced cottage in a residential road of similar properties. The accommodation comprises three rooms, kitchen/diner and bathroom/wc. The landlord has installed double glazing and central heating otherwise the house is unmodernised. The tenant has been in occupation since February 1976. The parties agreed that no works have been carried out since 1996 other than the installation of an electric fire in 2022. The landlord has also paid for the hall and staircase to be redecorated.

8. The landlord noted that the latest registered rent was below that registered in February 2022.

The Law

9. When determining a fair rent the tribunal, in accordance with section 70 of the Rent Act 1977, must have regard to all the circumstances including the age, location and state of repair of the property. It also must disregard the effect of any relevant tenant’s improvements and the effect of any disrepair or any other defect attributable to the tenant or any predecessor in title under the regulated tenancy, on the rental value of the property. The Tribunal is unable to take into account the tenant’s personal circumstances when assessing the fair rent.

10. In [COMPANY] v Chairman of the Greater Manchester etc Committee (1995) 28 HLR 107 and [NAME] v [NAME] (1999) QB 92 the Court of appeal emphasised:

That ordinarily a fair rent is the market rent for the property discounted for scarcity i.e. that element, if any, of the market rent, that is attributable to there being a significant shortage of

similar properties in the wider locality available for letting on similar terms to that of a regulated tenancy, and

That for the purposes of determining the market rent, assured tenancy market rents are usually appropriate comparables; adjusted as necessary to reflect any relevant differences between the comparables and the subject property.

Valuation 11. In the first instance I determined what rent the landlord could reasonably be expected to obtain for the property in the open market if it were let today in the condition and on the terms considered usual for such an open market letting. As no evidence had been provided by either party I relied on my own general knowledge of rental values in SE10 and concluded that the likely market rent for the property in fully refurbished condition would be £420 per week.

12. However, it was first necessary to adjust the hypothetical rent of £420 to allow for the differences between the terms and condition considered usual for such a letting and the condition of the actual property at the valuation date, ignoring any tenant’s improvements, (disregarding the effect of any disrepair or other defect attributable to the tenant or any predecessor in title). I determined that the hypothetical rent should be reduced by £150 to reflect the lack of modernisation, carpets curtains and white goods and difference it terms and conditions.

13. This leaves an adjusted market rent for the subject property of £270 per week. I am of the opinion that there is substantial scarcity for similar properties in Greater London and therefore made a deduction of 20% from the adjusted market rent to reflect this element. The uncapped fair rent is £214 per week.

Decision

14. The uncapped fair rent initially determined by me, for the purposes of section 70, is below the maximum fair rent of £248.50 per week calculated under the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999. Therefore, the rent will not be capped under the provisions of the Order.

19. Accordingly, the sum of £214 per week will be registered as the fair rent with effect from 24 September 2024 being the date of my decision.

Chairman: [NAME]: 24 September 2024

ANNEX - RIGHTS OF APPEAL

By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the Tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written application for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional Office which has been dealing with the case. The application should be made on Form RP PTA available at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/form-rp-pta-application-for- permission-to-appeal-a-decision-to-the-upper-tribunal-lands-chamber The application for permission to appeal must arrive at the Regional Office within 28 days after the Tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the person making the application. If the application is not made within the 28-day time limit, such application must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the Tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party making the application is seeking. Please note that if you are seeking permission to appeal against a decision made by the Tribunal under the Rent Act 1977, the Housing Act 1988 or the Local Government and Housing Act 1989, this can only be on a point of law. If the First-tier Tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further application for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tribunal determined a fair rent of £214 per week for the property.
  • The tribunal considered the property's lack of modernisation, carpets, curtains, and white goods when adjusting the hypothetical market rent.
  • The tribunal applied a 20% deduction to the adjusted market rent due to substantial scarcity of similar properties in Greater London.
  • The determined fair rent was below the maximum fair rent allowed by the 1999 Order, so no capping was applied.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • The landlord's requested rent of £950 per month was not accepted by the tribunal.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It set a fair rent of £214 per week for a property.

Who was involved?

A landlord and a tenant were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

They used the Rent Act 1977 to determine a fair rent that reflects the property's condition and market value.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The scarcity of similar properties in the area was a key factor in determining the fair rent.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the landlord, who sought a higher rent.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should consider the property's condition, market value, and local scarcity when determining a fair rent.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Evidence included the property's condition, market value, and the scarcity of similar properties.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving fair rent determinations.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.