VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Property

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on the fair rent for a property, taking into account its condition, location, and market value. The fair rent was set at £800 per month.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair rent that reflects the property's condition and market value, adjusted for scarcity.

Topics

fair rentproperty conditionmarket value

Provisions

Rent Act 1977Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined the fair rent for a property considering its condition, location, and market value.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined the fair rent for a property considering its condition, location, and market value, adjusting for scarcity. The fair rent was set at £800 per month.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

FR24 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00AJ/F77/2023/0157

Notice of the Tribunal Decision

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 77 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME] Mr [APPELLANT]

Landlord [RESPONDENT] & [RESPONDENT]

Tenant [APPELLANT]

1. The fair rent is 800.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)

2. The effective date is 18 December 2023

3. The amount for services is Not applicable Per

Not applicable

4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is

0.00 Per

not applicable

5. The rent is/is not to be registered as variable.

6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf).

7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry

Ground floor flat in converted house comprising three rooms, kitchenette and bathroom/wc, central heating and garden

8. For information only:

(a) The fair rent to be registered is not limited by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999, because it is the same as/below the maximum fair rent of £1,161 per month prescribed by the Order.

[NAME] of decision 18 December 2023

FR24 MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION

LATEST RPI FIGURE X 376.4

PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 296

X 377.8 Minus Y 296 = (A) 81.8

(A) 81.8 Divided by Y 296 = (B) 0.27635

First [NAME] for re-registration since 1 February 1999 YES/NO

If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C)

If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.32635

Last registered rent* £875 Multiplied by (C) = £1,160.56 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)

Rounded up to nearest 50p = £1,161

Variable service charge NO If YES add amount for services

MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £1,161 Per Month

Explanatory Note

1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.

2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:

(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and

(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present [NAME] was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent [NAME] since that date).

A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).

The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.

3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.

4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the [NAME] of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.

Case Reference : LON/00AJ/F77/2023/0157

P:PAPERREMOTE

Property : 77 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Applicant: [redacted]

Respondent: [redacted] : 26 April 2023

Type of [NAME] : Determination of the registered rent under Section 70 Rent Act 1977

Tribunal

: Mrs [NAME]

Mr [NAME] and venue of : 18 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

_______________________________________________

DECISION ____________________________________

The registered rent with effect from 18 December 2023 is £800 per month.

© CROWN COPYRIGHT

FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

Background

1. On 8 February 2023 the landlord applied to the rent officer for registration of a fair rent of £1105 per month for the above property.

2. The registered rent at the date of the [NAME] was £875 per month which had been registered by the rent officer on 2 February 2021 with effect from the same date.

3. On 28 March 2023, the rent officer registered a fair rent of £897 per month with effect from the same date.

4. On 26 April 2023 the landlord objected to the registered rent.

5. The tribunal issued Directions on 9 June 2023. The landlord and the tenant made written representations which were copied to the other party.

The Inspection

6. The Tribunal inspected the property on the morning of 28 August 2023 in the presence of the tenant. The property is a ground floor flat in a converted two storey end terrace house c1900. It is situated on a busy main road, a bus route and opposite a local parade of shops.

7. Externally the house is in poor condition. Both the walls and roof require attention. There are areas where the pointing is almost non- existent, cracks in the brickwork and poor filling around the outlet from the gas boiler.

8. The accommodation comprises three rooms, kitchenette and bathroom/wc. The windows are Upvc double glazed units and there is gas fired boiler central heating.

9. The front room has a non-functioning gas fire, rusty radiator, surface mounted wiring and evidence of water penetration. The middle room had an extensive area of damp to the left of the window and cracks in the cornice. The consumer unit, electricity meter and a number of capped off gas pipes were situated in the open area under the stairs. There is extensive damp in the back addition room which leads directly into the kitchenette. The kitchenette, has a single drainer sink unit on an old, poor quality base. There is damp under the sink unit, the walls have tiling above the sink unit. A door leads directly into a very cramped and dated bathroom/wc where there was evidence of damp and rotten plaster.

The Evidence

10. The landlord gave a brief description of the property which he described as in average condition. He referred to a letting of the flat above at £1200 per month which he said provided similar

accommodation and two other flats let at £1100 and £1200 per month which he stated were similar.

11. The tenant stated that the landlord had provided a new boiler a few years ago. There was mould in the kitchen, bathroom and one of the living rooms. The plasterwork in the flat was in poor condition. All the electrical appliances, carpets curtains and white goods were the tenant’s.

The Law

12. When determining a fair rent the tribunal, in accordance with section 70 of the Rent Act 1977, must have regard to all the circumstances including the age, location and state of repair of the property. It also must disregard the effect of any relevant tenant’s improvements and the effect of any disrepair or any other defect attributable to the tenant or any predecessor in title under the regulated tenancy, on the rental value of the property. The Tribunal is unable to take into account the tenant’s personal circumstances when assessing the fair rent.

13. In [COMPANY] v [NAME] of the Greater Manchester etc Committee (1995) 28 HLR 107 and [NAME] v [NAME] (1999) QB 92 the Court of appeal emphasised:

That ordinarily a fair rent is the market rent for the property discounted for scarcity i.e. that element, if any, of the market rent, that is attributable to there being a significant shortage of similar properties in the wider locality available for letting on similar terms to that of a regulated tenancy, and

That for the purposes of determining the market rent, assured tenancy market rents are usually appropriate comparables; adjusted as necessary to reflect any relevant differences between the comparables and the subject property.

Valuation 14. In the first instance the Tribunal determined what rent the landlord could reasonably be expected to obtain for the property in the open market if it were let today in the condition and on the terms that is considered usual for such an open market letting. It relied on the brief details provided by the landlord its own general knowledge of rental values Ealing and concluded that the likely market rent for the property would be £1,600 per month.

15. However, it was first necessary to adjust the hypothetical rent of £1600 per month to allow for the differences between the terms and condition considered usual for such a letting and the condition of the actual property at the valuation date, ignoring any tenant’s improvements, (disregarding the effect of any disrepair or other defect attributable to the tenant or any predecessor in title). The Tribunal determined that the hypothetical rent should be reduced by £600 to reflect the

difference in the terms of the tenancy, the condition of the property, the lack of any amenities or storage in the kitchenette apart from those provided by the tenant, the layout whereby the front room was accessed via the rear room in the main section of the house, the lack of carpets, curtains and white goods which are usually provided on the open market.

16. This leaves an adjusted market rent for the subject property of £1000 per month. The tribunal was of the opinion that there was substantial scarcity for similar properties in Greater London and therefore made a deduction of 20% from the adjusted market rent to reflect this element. The tribunal’s uncapped fair rent is £800 per month.

Decision

17. The uncapped fair rent initially determined by the tribunal, for the purposes of section 70, is below the maximum fair rent of £1161 per month calculated under the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.

19. Accordingly, the sum of £800 per month will be registered as the fair rent with effect from 18 December 2023 being the date of the tribunal's decision.

[NAME]: [NAME]: 18 December 2023

ANNEX - RIGHTS OF APPEAL

By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the Tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written [NAME] for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional Office which has been dealing with the case. The [NAME] should be made on Form RP PTA available at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/form-rp- pta-[NAME]-for-permission-to-appeal-a-decision-to-the-upper-tribunal-lands- chamber The [NAME] for permission to appeal must arrive at the Regional Office within 28 days after the Tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the [NAME]. If the [NAME] is not made within the 28-day time limit, such [NAME] must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the Tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the [NAME] for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit.

The [NAME] for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party [NAME] the [NAME] is seeking. Please note that if you are seeking permission to appeal against a decision made by the Tribunal under the Rent Act 1977, the Housing Act 1988 or the Local Government and Housing Act 1989, this can only be on a point of law. If the First-tier Tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further [NAME] for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 11 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The property's condition is taken into account when determining the fair rent.
  • Market value and market conditions influence the determination of a fair rent.
  • Scarcity of similar properties adjusts the calculation of a fair rent.
  • Fair rent calculations often incorporate the Retail Price Index as a reference.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • No significant factors identified that went against the claimant in these cases.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The fair rent for a property was set at £800 per month.

Who was involved?

A tenant and a landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court considered the property's condition, location, and market value, adjusting for scarcity.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the property's condition and market value.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should consider the condition and market value of their property when seeking a fair rent.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Evidence of the property's condition and comparable market values mattered.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving fair rent determinations.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.