VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Fair Rent Increased Due to Significant Property Improvements

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal increased the fair rent after the landlord improved the property's condition significantly. The Tribunal considered the improvements and set a new fair rent of £248.40 per week.

⚖️ Legal holding

A landlord is entitled to a higher fair rent if they have significantly improved the property's condition.

Topics

fair rentproperty improvementstenancy

Provisions

Rent Act 1977The Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal increased the fair rent after considering improvements made to the property.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal increased the fair rent from £248.40 per week, after considering the landlord's significant improvements to the property's condition, including new kitchen and bathroom fittings, gas central heating, and complete redecoration.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

FR27 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. HS/LON/00BB/F77/2024/0215

Notice of the Tribunal Decision

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 172 Charlemont Roam, East Ham, London, [POSTCODE]

[NAME] Mr [APPELLANT] [NAME]

Landlord [APPELLANT]

Tenant Mr [APPELLANT]

1. The fair rent is 248.40 Per Week (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)

2. The effective date is 14 February 2025

3. The amount for services is

Per

not applicable

4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is

Per

not applicable

5. The rent is not to be registered as variable.

6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 do not apply because 15% exemption.

7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry

8. For information only:

[NAME] of decision 14 February 2025

FR27

1

Case Reference

: LON/00BB/F77/2024/0215

Property : 172 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Tenant

: Mr [APPELLANT]

Landlord : [APPELLANT] of Objection : 16 April 2024

Type of Application : Section 70, Rent Act 1977

Tribunal

: Mr [NAME] Mr [NAME] of determination : 14 February 2025

Date of Summary Reasons

: 14 February 2025

_______________________________________________

DECISION

The sum of £248.40 per week will be registered as the fair rent with effect from 14 February 2025 being the date the Tribunal made the Decision. ____________________________________

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023

FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

2

SUMMARY REASONS

Background

1. Following an objection from the Landlord to the determination of a fair rent by the Rent Officer on the 16 April 2024, the Tribunal has made a determination under the provisions of the Rent Act 1977.

Evidence

2. The Tribunal has consideration of the Rent Officers calculations. The parties submitted limited written submissions which have been taken fully into account. Neither party provided the Tribunal with any comparable evidence.

3. It is evident that when the Rent Officer inspected the property, it was in a completely dilapidated and neglected condition. There was no heating system, electrical system disconnected, tin bath in the kitchen and no proper kitchen and sanitary fittings. The Rent Officer commented “This flat is in such poor condition it would be extremely hard to let on the open market’

4. It would appear following this inspection, Newham Borough Council condemned the property, and the Landlord subsequently undertook major refurbishment works to bring it up to a habitable standard which included gas central heating, replacement double glazed windows, new kitchen and sanitary fittings, rewiring and complete redecoration. The ramifications of these improvement works are considered in greater detail later in this decision.

Inspection

The Tribunal inspected the property on the 14 February 2025 in the presence of the Tenant, Mr [APPELLANT].

Determination and Valuation

4. Having consideration of our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the East Ham area, together with the Tenant’s submissions. The Tribunal considers that an achievable rent for a similar two-bedroom flat in a good marketable condition with reasonably modern kitchen and bathroom fittings, modern services with carpets curtains and white goods provided by the Landlord would be £345 per week (approximately £15,00 per month)

5. From this level of rent we have made adjustments in relation to: the tenant’s terms of the tenancy which equates to approximately 10%

3 6. The Tribunal has made an adjustment of 20% for scarcity as it considers there is a restricted supply of similar rental properties in the general area.

7. The calculations for the valuation is shown below:

Market Rent £345 pw

Less

approx. 10%

£34.50 Terms

Leaves

£310.50

Less Scarcity 20% £62.10

8. The Tribunal determines a rent of £248.40 per calendar week.

Decision

9. The uncapped fair rent initially determined by the Tribunal, for the purposes of section 70, was £248.40 per week.

10. Article 2 (7) The Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 confirms This article does not apply in respect of a dwelling-house if because of a change in the condition of the dwelling-house or the common parts as a result of repairs or improvements (including the replacement of any fixture or fitting) carried out by the landlord or a superior landlord, the rent that is determined in response to an application for registration of a new rent under Part IV exceeds by at least 15% the previous rent registered or confirmed.

11. The Tribunal are of the opinion that the new rent exceeds the previously registered rent by at least 15% as a result of the works carried out by the Landlord. Therefore, in this case the capping arrangements do not apply to this application.

12. For these reasons the rent of £248.40 per calendar week is to be registered as the fair rent for this property to take effect from the 14 February 2025 being the date the Tribunal made the Decision.

13. This is a significant increase in the former Registered Rent and the Tribunal sincerely hope the Landlord will take a sympathetic and pragmatic view due to the age and circumstances of this very elderly tenant.

4

Chairman: [NAME]: 14 February 2025

APPEAL PROVISIONS

These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The landlord has significantly improved the property's condition.
  • Fair rent adjustments are made based on the property's condition and market conditions.
  • Rent adjustments are made according to statutory formulas.
  • Rent adjustments consider the landlord's actual charging practices.
  • Fair rent determinations take into account comparable rental levels.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal decided to increase the fair rent to £248.40 per week.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the significant improvements made to the property by the landlord.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Rent Act 1977 and The Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the significant improvements made to the property by the landlord.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the landlord.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation may also be able to increase their fair rent if they have made significant improvements to their property.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The evidence of the property's condition before and after the improvements mattered.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is always recommended to get advice from a qualified solicitor for cases like this.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.