First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Fair Rent for Tenant Improvements
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal adjusted the fair rent for a tenant's improvements and the landlord's actual charging practices, setting a new rent of £248.20 per week.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a fair rent adjustment based on improvements made to the property and the landlord's actual charging practices.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal adjusted the fair rent after considering the tenant's improvements and the landlord's charging policy.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) adjusted the fair rent for a tenant's improvements and the landlord's actual charging practices, setting a new rent of £248.20 per week.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
1
Case Reference:
LON/00AS/F77/2025/0231
Property: 72 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Tenant: `
Mrs [APPELLANT]
Landlord:
[NAME] of Objection:
18 June 2025
Type of Application: Section 70, Rent Act 1977
Tribunal:
Judge I [NAME]
[NAME] of Extended Reasons
: 6 October 2025
_____________________________________________
DECISION
The sum of £248.20 per week will be registered as the fair rent with effect from 6 October 2025 being the date the Tribunal made the Decision. ___________________________
© CROWN COPYRIGHT
FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
2
EXTENDED REASONS
Background 1. Following an objection from the tenant to the determination of a fair rent by the Rent Officer, the Tribunal has made a determination under the provisions of the Rent Act 1977.
Inspection 2. The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case on the basis of the documentary evidence only.
Evidence 3. No written submissions were received from the landlord. However, the Tribunal noted that, despite the registration of a higher fair rent, the landlord, as a social landlord, does in fact charge a lower rent in accordance with its prevailing annual rent increase formulation or policy.
4. Written representations were made on behalf of the tenant variously dated from 10-12 September 2025 in which general unsupported assertions were made about the improvements she had allegedly carried out to the property having taken out a loan, for which she is still paying for. This assertion was supported by limited photographic evidence provided and was of decking and a patio roof covering. It is important to note that the tenant’s assertion about the improvements carried out by her and the cost was unchallenged by the landlord.
Accordingly, the Tribunal accepted the tenant’s evidence on this issue and applied the appropriate discount below for the rental value attributable to the improvements carried out by her.
Determination and Valuation 5. Having consideration of our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area of Uxbridge, we consider that the open market rent for the property in its current condition would be in the region of £474.23 per week.
6. From this level of rent we have made global adjustments in relation to:
The tenant’s decorating liability No white goods No floor covering or curtains Tenant’s improvements for tenant’s refit of kitchen, installation of new bathroom suite and redecoration, wood decking, pergola roof and turfing of the garden.
7. After deducting the amount for services, the Tribunal has also made an adjustment for scarcity.
8. The full valuation is shown below:
per week Market Rent
£474.23
Less Deductions above
)
) 35% )
£308.25
Less Service charge
£7.99
3
£300.26 Less Scarcity
approx. 20%
£60.05
£240.21 Plus Service charge
£7.99
£248.20
9. The Tribunal determines a rent of £248.20per week.
Decision 10. The rent has not been capped under the provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rents) Order 1999 as it is below MFR of £264 per calendar week.
Tribunal Judge: [NAME]: 6 October 2025
APPEAL PROVISIONS
These extended reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. Any application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.
FR27 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00AS/F77/2025/0231
Notice of the Tribunal Decision
Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 72 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Tribunal Judge I [NAME] [NAME]
[NAME]
Tenant Mrs [APPELLANT]
1. The fair rent is 248.20 Per week (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)
2. The effective date is 6 October 2025
3. The amount for services is 7.99 Per week
4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is
Per
not applicable
5. The rent is not to be registered as variable.
6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf).
7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry
N/A
8. For information only:
(a) The fair rent to be registered is not limited by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999, because it is below the maximum fair rent of £ 265 per week including £26.32 per week for services prescribed by the Order.
Chairman Tribunal Judge I [NAME] of decision 6 October 2025
FR27 MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION
LATEST RPI FIGURE X 402.9
PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 364.5
X 402.9 Minus Y 364.5 = (A) 38.4
(A) 38.4 Divided by Y 364.5 = (B) 0.10534979
First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 NO
If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C)
If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.15534979
Last registered rent* 221.51 Multiplied by (C) = 255.92 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)
Rounded up to nearest 50p = 256.00
Variable service charge NO If YES add amount for services 7.99
MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £263.99 Per week
Explanatory Note
1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.
2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:
(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and
(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).
A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).
The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.
3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.
4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Fair Rent Determination for Tenant Under Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent at £241.50 Per Week
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Maximum Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Tenanted Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Property Under Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Fair Rent Determination for Property Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Tenancy Under Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Property
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant's claims about making improvements to the property were accepted because the landlord did not challenge them.
- The Tribunal applied a discount to the rent because the tenant had made improvements to the property.
- The Tribunal considered its own expert knowledge of local rental values to determine the open market rent.
- A global adjustment was made for the tenant's decorating liability, lack of white goods, and lack of floor coverings or curtains.
- The fair rent was determined to be £248.20 per week, as it was below the maximum fair rent allowed by law.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- The landlord did not submit any written arguments to the Tribunal.
- The tenant's general assertions about improvements and a loan were unsupported by detailed evidence.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
It decided to adjust the fair rent for a tenant's improvements and the landlord's actual charging practices.
Who was involved?
The tenant made improvements to the property, and the landlord charged a lower rent according to their policy.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court considered the tenant's improvements and the landlord's actual charging practices, adjusting the fair rent accordingly.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The tenant's improvements and the landlord's actual charging practices were the most significant arguments.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the person who brought the case.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation may be able to negotiate a fairer rent based on improvements they make to their property.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Photographic evidence of the tenant's improvements was presented and accepted by the court.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, decisions like this can be appealed through the appropriate channels.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving fair rent adjustments.
