First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Tenanted Property
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal decided on a fair a person for a rented property, taking into account the property's condition and features. The a person was set at £228 per month.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a fair a person adjusted for the condition and characteristics of their property.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined a fair a person after considering various factors affecting the property's value.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined a fair rent of £228 per calendar month for a property, adjusting the rent based on the property's condition and characteristics.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
1
Case Reference
: LON/00AS/F77/2025/0259
Property : 11 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Tenant
:
Mrs [APPELLANT]
Landlord : [APPELLANT] of Application : Section 70, [NAME] 1977
Tribunal: : Judge Shepherd and [NAME] of Summary Reasons
: 25th November 2024
_______________________________________________
DECISION
The sum of £228 per week will be registered as the fair [NAME] with effect from 25th November 2025 being the date the Tribunal made the Decision. ____________________________________
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023
FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
2
SUMMARY REASONS
Background 1. Following an objection from the Tenant to the determination of a fair [NAME] by the [NAME], the Tribunal has made a determination under the provisions of the [NAME] 1977.
Inspection
2. The Tribunal did not carry out an inspection. unal has carried out an inspection of the property on 13th February 2024.
Evidence 3. The Tribunal has consideration of the written submissions provided by the [NAME].
Determination and Valuation 4. Having consideration of the comparable evidence proved by the parties and our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, we consider that the open market [NAME] for the property in good tenantable condition would be in the region of £2100 per calendar month or £485 per week. From this level of [NAME] we have made adjustments in relation to:
Lack of repair – 10% Lack of floor coverings – 5% No white goods- 5% Unmodernised kitchen -5%
5. The Tribunal has also made an adjustment for scarcity -20%
6. The full valuation is shown below:
[NAME]£2100 per calender month.
Disrepair-£210
Less contents- £210 per calender month
Unmodernised kitchen -£105
Less scarcity- £420 per calender month
Equals- £1154 pcm or £266.54per week
The maximum fair [NAME] is £228 pcm
3
Therefore the Tribunal determines a [NAME] of £ 228 per calender month.
Decision 8. The uncapped fair [NAME] initially determined by the Tribunal, for the purposes of section 70, was £1470 per calendar month or £339 per week . The capped [NAME] for the property according to the provisions of the [NAME] ([NAME]) Order 1999 is calculated at £. The calculation of the capped [NAME] is shown on the decision form. In this case the lower [NAME] of £228 per calender month is to be registered as the fair [NAME] or this property.
Chairman: Judge Shepherd
25th November 2025
APPEAL PROVISIONS
These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any request for full reasons should be made within a month. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Fair Rent to £660 Due to Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Fair Rent Determination for Property Under Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Adjusts Fair Rent for Property Considering Multiple Factors
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal sets fair rent for property under Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Adjusts Fair Rent for Tenant Based on Market Conditions
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Maximum Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Sloane Square Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent at £241.50 Per Week
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent of £255 Per Week for Tenancy
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The fair rent was adjusted downwards due to the property's lack of repair.
- The fair rent was adjusted downwards because the property lacked floor coverings.
- The fair rent was adjusted downwards because the property did not include white goods.
- The fair rent was adjusted downwards to account for the scarcity of similar properties.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal determined a fair rent of £228 per calendar month for the property.
Who was involved?
The tenant objected to the initial determination of the fair rent, and the landlord was involved in the process.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court considered the property's condition and made adjustments accordingly, resulting in a fair rent of £228 per month.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument regarding the property's condition and necessary adjustments was crucial.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant, as the rent was adjusted in their favour.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation may benefit from having their property's condition taken into account when determining a fair rent.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Written submissions from both the tenant and landlord were considered, along with an inspection report.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, either party can appeal this decision if they disagree with the outcome.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.
