VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Tribunal Adjusts Fair Rent for Tenant Based on Market Conditions

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on a fair rent for a tenant, reducing the initial proposal from £282.00 to £237.99 per week after considering the tenant's responsibilities and market conditions.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair rent that reflects the current market conditions and the tenant's obligations.

Topics

fair renttenancy agreementrent officer determination

Provisions

Rent Act 1977Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal adjusted the proposed fair rent after considering various factors including the tenant's responsibilities and scarcity in the market.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) reduced the proposed fair rent from £282.00 to £237.99 per week after considering the tenant's responsibilities and market scarcity.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2025

Case Reference : LON/00AH/F77/2-25/0288 Property : 44 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Tenant : Mrs [APPELLANT] Landlord : [COMPANY] (Exempt Charity) Date of Objection : 11 July 2025 Type of Application : Section 70, Rent Act 1977 Tribunal Members : Mrs [NAME] and venue of Consideration : 22 December 2025 [ADDRESS], London Date of Decision : 22 December 2025

_______________________________________________

DECISION

The sum of £237.99 per calendar week will be registered as the fair rent with effect from 22 December 2025, being the date the Tribunal made the Decision. ____________________________________

FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

2 SUMMARY REASONS

Background 1. Following an objection from the Tenant to the determination of a fair rent by the Rent Officer, the Tribunal has made a determination under the provisions of the Rent Act 1977. Inspection 2. The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties. Evidence 3. The Tribunal has consideration of the written submissions provided by the Landlord which was focused on the registered service charge element being registered too low. There were no written submissions from the Tenant. Determination and Valuation 4. Having consideration of our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in good tenantable condition would be in the region of £415 per calendar week. From this level of rent we have made adjustments in relation to the tenant’s decoration liability, no provision of white goods and no curtains / floor coverings.

5. The Tribunal has also made an adjustment for scarcity.

6. The full valuation is shown below:

per calendar week Market Rent

£415.00

Less Tenant’s decoration liability

) 5% No provision of white goods

) 5% No provision of curtains / floor coverings ) 5%

£62.25

£352.75

Less Scarcity

approx. 20%

£70.55

£282.20

Say £282.00

3

7. The Tribunal determines a rent of £282.00 per calendar week. Decision 8. The uncapped fair rent initially determined by the Tribunal, for the purposes of section 70, was £282.00 per calendar week. The capped rent for the property according to the provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 is calculated at £237.99 per calendar week. The calculation of the capped rent is shown on the decision form. In this case the lower rent of £237.99 per calendar week is to be registered as the fair rent or this property. Chairman: [NAME]: 22 December 2025

APPEAL PROVISIONS

These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any request for full reasons should be made within a month. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA

FR27 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00AH/F77/2025/0288

Notice of the Tribunal Decision

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 44 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

[NAME]

Landlord [COMPANY]

Tenant Mrs [APPELLANT]

1. The fair rent is £237.99 Per week (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)

2. The effective date is 22 December 2025

3. The amount for services is

£2.79 Per week

negligible/not applicable

4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is

- Per -

negligible/not applicable

5. The rent is/is not to be registered as variable.

6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf)/ do not apply because 1st registration/15% exemption.

7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry

8. For information only:

(a) The fair rent to be registered is the maximum fair rent as prescribed by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999. The rent that would otherwise have been registered was £ 282.00 ................. per week .......................... including £ 5.99 ............... per week ........................ for services (variable).

(b) The fair rent to be registered is not limited by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999, because it is the same as/below the maximum fair rent of £ ................... per .................... including £ ......................................... per ................................. for services (variable) prescribed by the Order.

[NAME] of decision 22 December 2025

FR27 MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION

LATEST RPI FIGURE X 405.6

PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 378.4

X 405.6 Minus Y 378.4 = (A) 27.2

(A) 27.2 Divided by Y 378.4 = (B) 0.[PHONE]

First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 YES/NO

If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C)

If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.121881607

Last registered rent* £206.52 Multiplied by (C) = £231.69 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)

Rounded up to nearest 50p = £232.00

Variable service charge YES / NO If YES add amount for services £5.99

MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £237.99 Per week

Explanatory Note

1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.

2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:

(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and

(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).

A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).

The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.

3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.

4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The Tribunal used its own expert knowledge of local rental values to determine an open market rent.
  • The fair rent was adjusted downwards because the tenant was responsible for decoration.
  • The fair rent was adjusted downwards because the landlord did not provide white goods.
  • The fair rent was adjusted downwards because the landlord did not provide curtains or floor coverings.
  • An adjustment was made for scarcity in the housing market, reducing the fair rent.
  • The capped rent, calculated according to the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999, was lower than the uncapped fair rent.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • The landlord's argument that the registered service charge element was too low was not accepted as the final registered rent included a lower service charge.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It decided on a fair rent of £237.99 per week for the tenant.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the market conditions and the tenant's responsibilities.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the adjustment for the tenant's responsibilities and market scarcity.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation may expect their fair rent to be adjusted based on their responsibilities and market conditions.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Written submissions from the landlord and the tribunal's own expert opinion mattered.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed within a month of the decision.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases like this.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.