VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Fair Rent to £660 Due to Property Condition

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal reduced the fair rent from £750 to £660 per month after considering the poor condition of the property and the scarcity of similar properties in the area.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair rent adjustment based on the condition of the property and market conditions.

Topics

fair rentdisrepairscarcity

Provisions

Rent Act 1977

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal adjusted the proposed rent due to disrepair and scarcity, setting a fair rent of £660 per month.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal adjusted the proposed rent of £750 per month to £660 per month due to disrepair and scarcity in the property, following an objection from the tenant under the Rent Act 1977. Judge Shepherd presided over the case.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

1

Case Reference

: LON/00AW/F77/2025/0297

Property : [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant

: [APPELLANT]

Landlord : [APPELLANT] of Application : Section 70, Rent Act 1977

Tribunal: : Judge Shepherd and [NAME] of Summary Reasons

: 12th February 2026

_______________________________________________

DECISION

The sum of £660 per month will be registered as the fair rent with effect from 12th February 2026 being the date the Tribunal made the Decision. ____________________________________

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023

FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

2

SUMMARY REASONS

Background 1. Following an objection from the Tenant to the determination of a fair rent by the Rent Officer, the Tribunal has made a determination under the provisions of the Rent Act 1977. The rent challenged was £750 per month from 9th September 2025.

Inspection

2. The Tribunal carried out an inspection. The room is within an impressive mansion block viewed externally from the front. Internally the block is considerably less impressive. The common areas are extremely tired and in need of modernisation. The Applicant’s room whilst large is desperately in need of attention and modernisation. His fridge is defective. The decorations are poor. The white good are in a poor state. He has suffered disrepair with the electrics as well as a leak from above. Most seriously he is an [NAME] who is expected to use stairs to access a bathroom which is shared. This is because the landlord has not repaired the shower adjacent to his room. [NAME] has carried out an inspection of the property on 13th February 2024.

Evidence 3.The Tribunal has consideration of the written submissions provided by the Tenant and landlord and its own inspection.

Determination and Valuation 4. Having consideration of the comparable evidence proved by the parties and our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in good tenantable condition would be in the region of £1100 per calendar month. From this level of rent we have made adjustments in relation to:

Lack of repair/ need of modernisation – 20%

5. The Tribunal has also made an adjustment for scarcity -20%

6. The full valuation is shown below:

Market rent £1100 per calender month.

Disrepair/modernisation -£220

Less scarcity- £220 per calender month

Equals- £660 per month

3

Add the services of £91.50

The maximum fair rent is £751.50 pcm

Therefore the Tribunal determines a rent of £751.50 per calender month.

Decision 8. The uncapped fair rent initially determined by the Tribunal, for the purposes of section 70, was £660 per calendar month . The capped rent for the property according to the provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 is calculated at £898.01. The calculation of the capped rent is shown on the decision form. In this case the lower rent of £660 per calendar month is to be registered as the fair rent or this property.

Chairman: Judge Shepherd

12th February 2026

APPEAL PROVISIONS

These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any request for full reasons should be made within a month. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The rent is adjusted based on market conditions.
  • The rent is adjusted based on the specific condition of the property.
  • The rent is adjusted considering improvements made by the tenant.
  • The rent is adjusted based on the tenant's ability to pay.
  • The rent is adjusted according to the local rental values.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The fair rent was adjusted to £660 per month.

Who was involved?

The tenant objected to the rent set by the landlord.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided to reduce the rent based on the property's disrepair and scarcity.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Rent Act 1977 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that the property was in poor condition and scarce in the area was crucial.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation may be able to argue for a reduction in rent based on the condition of their property.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Evidence of the property's condition and market conditions were important.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed if the losing party disagrees with the outcome.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.