First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent at £125 per Week
📌 In brief
A tribunal has set the fair rent at £125 per week for a terraced house in Wigston. The decision was based on adjustments made for items provided by the tenant, such as carpets and curtains, and their liability to redecorate.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tribunal must adjust the open market rent based on tenant contributions and liabilities when determining a fair rent under the Rent Act 1977.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined the fair rent for a terraced house in Wigston, adjusting for tenant improvements and liability.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal determined the fair rent for a terraced house in Wigston, adjusting from an open market rate of £200 per week to £125 per week after considering tenant improvements and liabilities.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
© CROWN COPYRIGHT
Case Reference
: BIR/31UF/F77/2025/0022
Property : 26 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Tenant
: [APPELLANT]
Landlord : [APPELLANT]
Landlord’s Agent : Hunters
Date of Objection : 10th July 2025
Type of Application : Section 70 Rent Act 1977
Tribunal Members : [NAME] (Chairman) [NAME] of Decision : 10th March 2026
_______________________________________________
DECISION
The sum of £125.00 per week will be registered as the fair rent with effect from 10th March 2026 being the date the Tribunal made the Decision. ____________________________________
FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
2 REASONS FOR THE DECISION
Background
1. Following an objection from the Landlord to the determination of a fair rent by the Rent Officer, the Tribunal has made a determination under the provisions of the Rent Act 1977.
Inspection
2. The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties and having regard to its own knowledge, expertise and online research.
Evidence
3. The Tribunal has considered the written submissions provided by the Tenant and the Landlord.
4. From the information provided it appears that the subject property comprises of a terraced house with full central heating. The Rent Officer notes that the original heating system was installed by the tenant and the landlord replaced the boiler. The accommodation is understood to comprise two living rooms and kitchen on the ground floor with two bedrooms and bathroom with a three-piece sanitary suite on the first floor. The tenant submits that there is some double glazing. There is a garden.
5. The tenant submits that:
a) Not all the windows are double glazed. b) She owns all the carpets, curtains and white goods. c) The central heating boiler is some 10 years old and is located in the outhouse.
6. The landlord submits that:
a) The central heating was replaced in 2017. b) New double-glazed windows were due to be provided commencing in October 2025.
Determination and Valuation
7. On consideration of the comparable evidence proved by the parties, that
forwarded by the Rent Officer and the Tribunal’s own expert knowledge of rental
values in the area, the Tribunal considers that the open market rent for the
property in a satisfactory condition would be in the region of £200.00 per week.
3
From this level of rent, the Tribunal has made adjustments in relation to the
following:
a) Improvements made by the Tenant - £10.00 b) Curtains, carpets and white goods fitted by the Tenant - £55.00 c) The Tenant’s liability to redecorate - £10.00
8. The Tribunal has also made an adjustment for scarcity using their own general
knowledge and experience. The Tribunal considers that in the wider geographical
area there is no imbalance of supply and demand impacting on rental values and
has, therefore, not made a reduction for scarcity.
9. The full valuation is shown below:
Market Rent
£200.00 per week
Less a) Items given under a) above
£10.00
b) Items given under b) above
£55.00 c) Tenant’s internal decoration liability @ 5% £10.00 £75.00 per week £125.00 per week
10. The Tribunal determines an uncapped rent of £125.00 per week.
Decision
11. The uncapped fair rent determined by the Tribunal, for the purposes of section 70, is therefore £125.00 per week from 10th March 2026. The maximum fair rent permitted by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 is £130.00 per week. This therefore has no impact on the rent determined by the Tribunal. The calculation of the capped rent is shown on the decision form.
Chairman: [NAME]: 10th March 2026
APPEAL PROVISIONS
If either party is dissatisfied with this decision, they may apply for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) on any point of law arising from this Decision. Prior to making such an appeal, an application must be made, in writing, to this Tribunal for permission to appeal. Any such application must be made within 28 days of the issue of this statement of reasons (regulation 52 (2) of The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013) stating the grounds upon which it is intended to rely in the appeal.
4 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No.
BIR/31UF/F77/2025/0022
Notice of the Tribunal Decision
Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 26 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
[NAME] Mrs [APPELLANT]
Landlord [APPELLANT]
Tenant [APPELLANT]
1. The fair rent is £125.00 Per week (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)
2. The effective date is 10th March 2026
3. The amount for services is N/A Per
4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is
N/A Per
5. The rent is/is not to be registered as variable.
6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf).
7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry
8. For information only:
The fair rent to be registered is not limited by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999, because it is below the maximum fair rent of £XXX permitted by the Order/ The fair rent to be registered is limited by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999, because it is above the maximum fair rent of £XXX permitted by the Order.
[NAME] of decision 10th March 2026
5 MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION
LATEST RPI FIGURE X 406.4
PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 376.4
X 406.4 Minus Y 376.4 = (A) 30.00
(A) 30.00 Divided by Y 376.4 = (B) 0.0797
First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 YES/NO
If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C)
If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.1297
Last registered rent* 115.00 Multiplied by (C) = 121.91 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)
Rounded up to nearest 50p = £130.00
Variable service charge NO If YES add amount for services
MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £130.00 Per Week Explanatory Note
1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.
2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:
(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and
(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).
A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).
The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.
3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.
4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Caps Fair Rent at £129 Per Week
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent Under Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent at £472 per Month
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent After Tenant's Objection
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for West Bromwich Flat
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent at £775.50 Per Month
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent Including Service Charges
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- Tenant entitlement to fair rent determination reflecting reasonable service charges and market rental values adjusted for scarcity.
- Tenant entitlement to fair rent calculation considering market conditions, property condition, and relevant deductions.
- Tenant entitlement to have their fair rent adjusted based on market conditions and specific property features as per the Rent Act 1977.
- Tenant entitlement to have their fair rent assessed based on market conditions and adjustments for specific circumstances of the tenancy.
- Landlord's objection to a Rent Officer's determination of fair rent must consider the actual market conditions and the specific circumstances of the property.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- Landlord's objection to a Rent Officer's determination of fair rent must be substantiated with evidence and comparable data.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The fair rent for the property was set at £125 per week.
Who was involved?
A tenant and a landlord were involved in the dispute over the fair rent of their property.
How did the court decide, and why?
The tribunal considered written submissions from both parties and adjusted the open market rate based on improvements made by the tenant.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11 was applied to determine the fair rent.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The tribunal considered items provided and installed by the tenant when adjusting the open market rate.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
It is unclear from the judgment which party initiated the application, but the rent adjustment benefited one of them.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone facing a fair rent determination should consider all improvements and liabilities when presenting their case to the tribunal.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Written submissions from both parties were crucial, as well as information about property conditions and tenant contributions.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Either party can apply for permission to appeal on points of law within 28 days.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is advisable to seek legal advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.
