Tribunal Caps Shared Ownership Property's Fair Rent
📌 In brief
In this case, the First-tier Tribunal decided on the fair rent for a shared ownership property. The tribunal calculated the fair rent but capped it at £399 per month because of legal limits set by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to have their fair rent capped by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 when the calculated fair rent exceeds this limit.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined the fair rent for a shared ownership property, capping it at £399 per month due to statutory limits.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined the fair rent for a shared ownership property, reducing it from £725.23 to £399 per month due to statutory limits under the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed in Part
© CROWN COPYRIGHT
Case Reference
: BIR/44UF/F77/2025/0014
Property : 27 Overberry Orchard, Bishops Tachbrook,
Leamington Spa, Warks., [POSTCODE]
Tenant
: [APPELLANT] and [APPELLANT]
Landlord : [COMPANY] of Objection : 30 May 2025
Type of Application : Section 70 Rent Act 1977 (Shared Ownership)
Tribunal Members : [NAME].D. [NAME] B.Sc.(Est.Man.) [NAME] B.Sc. MRICS
Date of Decision : 10 March 2026
_____________________________________________________
DECISION
_____________________________________________________
The sum of £399.00.00 per month will be registered as the Fair Rent with effect from 10 March 2026 being the date the Tribunal made the Decision.
FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
2 REASONS FOR THE DECISION
Background
1 The Rent Officer registered a rent of £386.04 per calendar month on 2 May 2025 which was due to take effect from 8 June 2025. The property is in shared ownership and the gross rent assessed by the Rent Officer was £444.83 pcm, but the Tenants owned a 25% share which reduced their payment to £386.04. Following objection from the Tenants to the Rent Officer's determination, the Tribunal has considered the case afresh and determined the rent under the provisions of the Rent Act 1977.
Inspection
2 The Tribunal has considered the case based on the papers provided by the parties having regard to its own knowledge, expertise and online research.
Description
3 From the submitted papers, the accommodation comprises a modern semi-detached house built around 1981 with a reception room, kitchen, two bedrooms and bathroom. There is full central heating and double glazing. The property has a parking space and garden. The carpets, curtains and white goods are provided by the Tenants.
Evidence
4 The Tenants objected to the Rent Officer's figure as they considered the increase to be excessive compared with the rents of other properties in the area. They gave an example of No.[ADDRESS], an house identical to theirs, advertised by local estate agents [COMPANY] at £1,250 pcm and on that basis a quarter share would equate to £312.50 pcm instead of the £386.04 valued by the Rent Officer. They currently pay £282.88 pcm so the proposed increase would be £103 pcm higher. They asked for the rent to be re-assessed.
5 The Landlord sent a written representation to the Tribunal in which they advised that the new registered rent was £386.04 pcm including an insurance charge of £23.17 pcm, but they would only be charging £303.89 pcm including the insurance charge with effect from 8 June 2025 as the rent had been capped.
Determination and Valuation
6 In the papers submitted to the Tribunal there was reference to a 25% share but it was not clear whether the 25% was owned by the Landlord or Tenant. The Tribunal wrote to the parties to clarify the position and the Landlord confirmed by email on 31 March that the Tenant owned 25% and the Landlord 75%. This is significant, as it appears the Tenants may have been under the impression that they owned 75%, which would
3
account for their analysis of the advertised rent of No.[ADDRESS]. The Tenants are therefore required to pay rent for the 75% owned by the Landlord for which the calculations are set out below where the Tenants are given full credit for their own 25% share.
7 The Tribunal has considered the evidence provided by the parties. To assess the Fair Rent of shared ownership property the Tribunal has to assess the Fair Rent assuming it were not shared ownership, and then adjust the figure to reflect the actual position.
8 Having read the parties' cases and taken into account our own professional expertise,
we consider the full rental value of a house in this location and description, in good condition, to be £1,250 pcm.
9 From this, we deduct £60 pcm to reflect the monthly value of the Tenants' carpets and curtains and £20 pcm for the monthly value of the Tenants' white goods.
10 We then consider whether there would be more people looking for accommodation of this type in the area than units to let, in which case, we deduct for 'scarcity'. Having considered this, we consider scarcity exists in the wider area and deduct 10% from the rental value to reflect it.
11 Having assessed the Fair Rent, the Tenant's 25% share is taken into account. Our valuation is as follows:
Full rental value pcm
1,250.00
Less carpets & curtains
60.00
white goods
20.00
1,170.00
Less 10% scarcity
117.00
Fair Rent if not shared ownership
1,053.00
Shared ownership calculation
Less service charge
0.00
Less full repairing liability (i.e. the tenants have
to repair the structure & exterior which is
not the case for Fair Rents say 7.5% of
market rent)
93.75
Less insurance
23.17
Gross Rent
936.08
x 75% share owned by landlord
702.06
Add service charge
0.00
Add insurance
23.17
Fair Rent of Landlord's 75% share
725.23
4 Decision
12 The Fair Rent calculated by the Tribunal for the Landlord's 75% share is £725.23 per month. However, the maximum fair rent permitted by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 is capped at £399.00 per month which limits the rent determined by the Tribunal. The calculation of the capped rent is shown on the decision form. The Tribunal therefore determines the Fair Rent at £399.00 (Three Hundred and Ninety Nine Pounds) per month with effect from 10 March 2026.
Chairman: [NAME].(Est.Man.) FRICS Date: 10 March 2026
APPEAL PROVISIONS
If either party is dissatisfied with this decision, they may apply for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) on any point of law arising from this Decision. Prior to making such an appeal, an application must be made, in writing, to this Tribunal for permission to appeal. Any such application must be made within 28 days of the issue of this statement of reasons (regulation 52 (2) of The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013) stating the grounds upon which it is intended to rely in the appeal.
5 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No.
BIR/44UF/F77/2025/0014
Notice of the Tribunal Decision
Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were: 27 Overberry Orchard, Bishops Tachbrook [POSTCODE]
[NAME].(Est.Man.) FRICS A [NAME] B.Sc. [COMPANY].
Tenant [APPELLANT] and [APPELLANT]
1. The fair rent is £399.00 Per month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)
2. The effective date is 10 March 2026
3. The amount for services is N/A Per
/not applicable
4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is
N/A Per
/ not applicable
5. The rent is not to be registered as variable.
6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf).
7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry
8. For information only:
The fair rent to be registered is the maximum fair as prescribed by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999. The rent that would have otherwise been registered was £725.23 per month.
[NAME] of decision 10 March 2026
6 MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION
LATEST RPI FIGURE x 406.4
PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE y 372.8
X 406.4 Minus y 372.8 = (A) 33.6 (A) 33.6 divided by y 372.8 = (B) 0.0901
First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 - NO
If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C) N/A
If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.1401
Last registered rent* £349.66 Multiplied by (C) = £398.65 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)
Rounded up to nearest 50 pence = £399.00
Variable service charge - No
If YES add amount for services
MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £399.00 Per month
Explanatory Note
1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.
2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:
(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and
(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).
A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).
The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.
3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Committee's fair rent determination was made.
4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.
N/A
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Caps Fair Rent at £129 Per Week
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent at £775.50 Per Month
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Maximum Fair Rent for Property Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Maximum Fair Rent for Tenanted Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Caps Fair Rent at Maximum Level Under Rent Act
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent Under Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent Including Service Charges
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for West Bromwich Flat
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent at £472 per Month
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent at £125 per Week
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The calculated fair rent exceeds the maximum fair rent limit set by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.
- Rent should reflect reasonable service charges and market rental values adjusted for scarcity.
- Fair rent calculation considers market conditions, property condition, and relevant deductions.
- Rent adjustment is based on market conditions and specific property features as per the Rent Act 1977.
- Tribunal adjusts the open market rent based on tenant contributions and liabilities when determining a fair rent under the Rent Act 1977.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal decided on the fair rent for a shared ownership property, capping it at £399 per month.
Who was involved?
A tenant and their landlord were involved in the dispute over the fair rent of a shared ownership property.
How did the court decide, and why?
The Tribunal considered evidence from both parties and applied statutory limits to cap the rent at £399 per month.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The tenant argued that the proposed rent increase was excessive compared to similar properties in the area.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was partially for the tenant, as it capped the rent at a lower amount than initially proposed.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation may also have their fair rent capped if it exceeds statutory limits.
What evidence or documents mattered?
The advertised rental prices of comparable properties and the ownership percentage were key pieces of evidence.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, either party can apply for permission to appeal on points of law within 28 days.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is advisable to seek legal advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.
