VadeLab
Allowed in PartFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Property in Chesterfield

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal set a fair rent of £102.00 per week for a property in Chesterfield after reviewing evidence from both parties and making necessary adjustments for the property's condition and improvements made by the tenant.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to have their fair rent assessed based on comparable properties and necessary adjustments.

Topics

tenancyfair rent

Provisions

Rent Act 1977 s.70Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined the fair rent for a property under the Rent Act 1977, considering comparables and adjustments.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal determined a fair rent of £102.00 per week for a property in Chesterfield, considering comparables and adjustments based on the condition of the property and improvements made by the tenant.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed in Part

© CROWN COPYRIGHT

Case Reference

: BIR/17UD/F77/2025/0027

Property : 47 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Tenant

: [NAME]

Landlord : [COMPANY] of Objection : 28th October 2025

Type of Application : Section 70 Rent Act 1977

Tribunal Members : Mr [NAME] Mrs [NAME] of Decision : 10th March 2026

_______________________________________________

DECISION

The sum of £102.00 per week will be registered as the fair rent with effect from 10th March 2026 being the date the Tribunal made the Decision. ____________________________________

FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

2 REASONS FOR THE DECISION

Background

1. Following an objection from the Tenant to the determination of a fair rent by the Rent Officer, the Tribunal has made a determination under the provisions of the Rent Act 1977.

Inspection

2. The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties and having regard to its own knowledge, expertise and online research.

Evidence

3. The Tribunal has considered the written submissions provided by the Tenant and the Landlord.

4. From the information provided it appears that the subject property comprises of a mid-terraced house. The accommodation is understood to comprise of a lounge and kitchen/diner on the ground floor. On the first floor are two bedrooms and a bathroom. The property has full central heating and, according to the tenants, double glazing. (The landlord says there is no double glazing). There is a private garden with patio and shed (provided by the tenant). Both parties confirm that carpets, curtains and white goods are provided by the tenant. Based on internet mapping it appears to the Tribunal that the property has at least some double glazing.

5. The tenant submits that the property is in need of ongoing repairs. In summary these are:

a) The living room window allows rain to penetrate and needs sealing. b) The kitchen comprises of only an old sink and small cupboard. c) There is a damp patch to bedroom 1 when it rains and the window is draughty. d) There is a damp patch to bedroom 2 when it rains and the window is draughty. e) The bathroom window needs repair and the W.C. works intermittently. f) The landlord cut off the shower (which the tenant had installed). g) The step to the back door is dangerous and crumbling. h) The rear door is an old timber unit in need of replacement. i) Numerous general ongoing repairs are required.

6. The landlord submits that in its opinion the Registered Rent is fair. As comparables the landlord submits several Registered Rents:

3 a) [ADDRESS], Brimington, Chesterfield – A modern 3-bedroom terraced house with car parking space - £121.00 per week from October 2023. b) [ADDRESS], Brimington, Chesterfield – A more modern terraced house with 3 bedrooms and car parking space - £130.50 per week from July 2024. c) [ADDRESS], Old Whittington, Chesterfield – A more modern terraced house with 3 bedrooms and car parking space - £127.00 per week from July 2024.

6. The landlord also submits details of the following properties offered on the open market at full market rents:

a) [ADDRESS], Chesterfield – A 2-bedroom terraced house offered at £650.00 per month.

Determination and Valuation

7. On consideration of the comparable evidence proved by the parties, that

forwarded by the Rent Officer and the Tribunal’s own expert knowledge of rental

values in the area, the Tribunal considers that the open market rent for the

property in a satisfactory condition would be in the region of £175.00 per week.

From this level of rent, the Tribunal has made adjustments in relation to the

following:

a) Condition – the Tribunal refers to the items detailed in paragraph 5 above. b) Improvements made by the Tenant to the garden and shed. c) Curtains, carpets and white goods fitted by the Tenant. d) The Tenant’s liability to redecorate.

8. The Tribunal has also made an adjustment for scarcity using their own general

knowledge and experience. The Tribunal considers that in the wider geographical

area there is no imbalance of supply and demand impacting on rental values and

has, therefore, has not made a reduction for scarcity.

9. The full valuation is shown below:

Market Rent

£175.00 per week

Less a) Items given under a) above

£50.00

b) Items given under b) above

£ 5.00 c) Items given under c) above

£10.00

d) Tenant’s internal decoration liability

£ 8.00

£73.00

£102.00

10. The Tribunal determines an uncapped rent of £102.00 per week.

4 Decision

11. The uncapped fair rent determined by the Tribunal, for the purposes of section 70, is therefore £102.00 per week from 10th March 2026. The maximum fair rent permitted by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 is £108.50 per week. This therefore has no impact on the rent determined by the Tribunal.

[NAME]: [NAME]: 10th March 2026

APPEAL PROVISIONS

If either party is dissatisfied with this decision, they may apply for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) on any point of law arising from this Decision. Prior to making such an appeal, an application must be made, in writing, to this Tribunal for permission to appeal. Any such application must be made within 28 days of the issue of this statement of reasons (regulation 52 (2) of The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013) stating the grounds upon which it is intended to rely in the appeal.

5 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No.

BIR/17UD/F77/2025/0027

Notice of the Tribunal Decision

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 47 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

[NAME] Mrs [APPELLANT]

Landlord [COMPANY]

Tenant [NAME]

1. The fair rent is £102.00 Per Week (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)

2. The effective date is 10th March 2026

3. The amount for services is N/A- Per -

4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is

N/A Per -

5. The rent is/is not to be registered as variable.

6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply/do not apply (please see calculation overleaf).

7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry

8. For information only:

The fair rent to be registered is not limited by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999, because it is below the maximum fair rent of £XXX permitted by the Order/ The fair rent to be registered is limited by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999, because it is above the maximum fair rent of £XXX permitted by the Order.

[NAME] of decision 10th March 2026

6 MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION

LATEST RPI FIGURE X 406.4

PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 372.8

X 406.4 Minus Y 372.8 = (A) 33.6

(A) 33.6 Divided by Y 372.8 = (B) 0.0901

First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 YES/NO

If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C)

If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.1401

Last registered rent* 95.00 Multiplied by (C) = 108.31 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)

Rounded up to nearest 50p = £108.50

Variable service charge NO If YES add amount for services

MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £108.50 Per Week Explanatory Note

1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.

2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:

(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and

(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).

A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).

The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.

3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.

4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • Fair rent should be adjusted based on market conditions and specific property features.
  • Rent adjustments must consider tenant contributions and liabilities.
  • Objections to rent determinations must be substantiated with evidence and comparable data.
  • Fair rent determinations should reflect the actual condition of the property and any improvements made by the tenant.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal set a fair rent of £102.00 per week for the property.

Who was involved?

A tenant and a landlord were involved in the dispute over the fair rent.

How did the court decide, and why?

The Tribunal considered comparables and adjustments based on the condition of the property and improvements made by the tenant.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The condition of the property and improvements made by the tenant were key factors in determining the fair rent.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was partially in favour of the tenant, setting a lower fair rent than initially proposed by the landlord.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should gather evidence on comparables and any improvements made to argue their case effectively.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Written submissions, property condition reports, and comparable rental information were important.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, either party can apply for permission to appeal on points of law within 28 days.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is advisable to seek legal advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.