First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent at £950 per Month
📌 In brief
In this case, the First-tier Tribunal set the monthly rent at £950 after reviewing evidence from both parties. The decision was based on comparable properties in the area and necessary adjustments to reflect the property's condition.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to have their rent set at a fair market value after considering comparable properties and necessary adjustments.
📖 What the law says
This section applies to certain types of assured periodic tenancies, allowing landlords to serve a notice proposing an increase in rent. The notice must specify a new rent to take effect at the beginning of a new period of the tenancy, which must begin at least two months after the notice is served. There are additional conditions for when the rent can be increased again after the initial increase.
A tenant under an assured tenancy can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will determine the rent at which the dwelling house might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy, taking into account various factors including the terms of the existing tenancy and any notices given under Grounds 1 to 5 of Schedule 2 to the Act.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined the market rent for a Leicester property under Section 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal determined a market rent of £950.00 per month for a Leicester property, considering comparable evidence and necessary adjustments under Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed in Part
© CROWN COPYRIGHT
Case Reference
: BIR/31UF/MNR/2025/0748
Property : 68 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Tenant
: [APPELLANT]
Landlord : [APPELLANT]
Landlord’s agent : None
Date of application : 17th June 2025
Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988
Tribunal Members : Mr [NAME] Mr [NAME] Mr [NAME] of Decision : 2nd March 2026
_______________________________________________
DECISION
The Tribunal determines a rent of £950.00 per month with effect from 1st July 2025. ____________________________________
FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
2 REASONS FOR THE DECISION Background
1. On 22nd May 2025 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £1,095.00 per month in place of the existing rent to take effect from 1st July 2025.
2. On 17th June 2025, under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent.
Inspection
3. The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties and having regard to its own knowledge, expertise and online research.
Evidence
4. The Tribunal has considered the written submissions provided by the [NAME].
5. From the information provided it appears that the property comprises of a terraced house with two reception rooms, kitchen, two bedrooms and bathroom. It is understood that the property has gas fired central heating and double glazing. There is a garden.
6. The tenant submits that the property is in poor condition. Photographs were included of various parts of the property illustrating the alleged defects.
7. The tenant submits the following comparable evidence, all being two-bedroom terraced houses:
[ADDRESS], Leicester - £895.00 per month [ADDRESS] - £895.00 per month
8. The landlord submits that the property has been refurbished. The original fire alarms were removed by the tenant and there were signs of water ingress.
9. The landlord has therefore reinstated the fire alarms, re-roofed the property and installed a dampproof course together with attendant re-plastering. A new RCD has been fitted, repairs completed to the stairs and new thermostatic valves fitted to radiators. At the same time new double-glazed windows and doors have been installed and new extractor fans. The total cost of the work was in the region of £25,000.00.
10. Photographs were included which show the property to be in considerably better condition than those submitted by the tenant. The landlord submits that he has provided the carpets, curtains and white goods.
3 11. The landlord submits the following comparable evidence, all being two-bedroom terraced houses:
[ADDRESS], Leicester - £1,150.00 per month [ADDRESS], Leicester - £1,050.00 per month [ADDRESS], Leicester - £1,095.00 per month [ADDRESS], Leicester - £1,100.00 per month [ADDRESS], Leicester - £1,083.00 per month
12. The Tribunal has considered the written submissions provided by the [NAME].
Determination and Valuation
13. Having considered the comparable evidence proved by the parties and of our own expert, knowledge of rental values in the area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in good tenantable condition would be in the region of £1,000.00 per month. From this level of rent we have made adjustments in relation to:
a) The Tenant’s liability to redecorate.
14. The full valuation is shown below:
Market Rent
£1,000.00 per month
Less a) Tenant’s internal decoration liability @ 5% £50.00
£50.00
£950.00 per month Decision
15. The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a [NAME] under an assured tenancy was £950.00 per month with effect from 1st July 2025.
Chairman: [NAME]: 2nd March 2026
APPEAL PROVISIONS
If either party is dissatisfied with this decision, they may apply for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) on any point of law arising from this Decision. Prior to making such an appeal, an application must be made, in writing, to this Tribunal for permission to appeal. Any such application must be made within 28 days of the issue of this statement of reasons (regulation 52 (2) of The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013) stating the grounds upon which it is intended to rely in the appeal.
© CROWN COPYRIGHT
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 68 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
[NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT] Mr [RESPONDENT]
Landlord [RESPONDENT] 87 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
[NAME] [APPELLANT]
1. The rent is: £950.00 Per month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 1st July 2025
3. The amount included for services is/is not applicable N/A Per
4. Date assured tenancy commenced 1st December 2019 5. Length of the term or rental period 12 months 6. Allocation of liability for repairs Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None 8. Description of premises A terraced house comprising two reception rooms, kitchen, two bedrooms and bathroom. Gas central heating. Double glazing. Garden, [NAME] of Decision 2nd March 2026
First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No.
BIR/31/UF/MNR/2025/0748
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Market Rent for Semi-Detached Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent at £712 per Month
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent at £735 per Month
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent at £825 pcm for Oldbury Flat
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent at £1,230 for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal sets fair rent of £618.75 pcm for Ipswich flat
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent After Tenant Improvements
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- Rent should be set at a fair market value based on comparable properties.
- The condition of the property must be taken into account when setting rent.
- Any improvements made by the tenant should adjust the proposed rent increase.
- Current market conditions and tenant liabilities must be considered when assessing rent.
- Rent proposals under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 must be reasonable and supported by comparables.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The tribunal decided that the market rent for a Leicester property should be £950 per month.
Who was involved?
A tenant and landlord were involved in the dispute over the rental price of a terraced house.
How did the court decide, and why?
The tribunal considered comparable evidence from similar properties and adjusted for necessary repairs to determine the fair market rent.
Which laws or rules were applied?
Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988 were applied in determining the rental price.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The comparable evidence provided by both parties played a crucial role in setting the rent at £950 per month.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The tenant's claim was partially successful as the rent was set lower than what the landlord proposed.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone facing a similar dispute should gather comparable evidence and present it to the tribunal to support their case.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Photographs of the property condition, comparable rental prices from other properties, and details of any refurbishments were important.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, either party can apply for permission to appeal on a point of law within 28 days.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is advisable to seek legal advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.
