VadeLab
Allowed in PartFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy Property

Case No.

📌 In brief

In this case, the First-tier Tribunal decided on the fair market rent for a property in an assured tenancy agreement. After considering defects and improvements made by the tenant, the rent was set at £875 per month from August 21st, 2025.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to have their rent set at a fair market value considering the condition of the property and any necessary adjustments.

Topics

tenancyrent determination

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

This section allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the open-market rent, considering various factors including the terms of the existing tenancy and any improvements made by the tenant.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined the market rent for a property based on written submissions and online research, adjusting for defects and improvements.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal determined the market rent for a property under an assured tenancy, considering defects and improvements. The rent was set at £875 per month with effect from August 21st, 2025.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed in Part

© CROWN COPYRIGHT

Case Reference

: BIR/17UC/MNR/2025/0793

Property : 7 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Tenant

: [APPELLANT]

Tenant’s agent : [COMPANY]

Landlord : [RESPONDENT]

Landlord’s agent : [RESPONDENT] of application : 20th August 2025

Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988

Tribunal Members : Mr [NAME] Mr [NAME] Mr [NAME] of Decision : 2nd March 2026

_______________________________________________

DECISION

The Tribunal determines a rent of £875.00 per month with effect from 21st August 2025. ____________________________________

FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

2 REASONS FOR THE DECISION Background

1. On 2nd July 2025 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £875.00 per month in place of the existing rent of £800.00 to take effect from 21st August 2025.

2. On 20th August 2025, under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent.

Inspection

3. The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties and having regard to its own knowledge, expertise and online research.

Evidence

4. The Tribunal has considered the written submissions provided by the Tenant. No written submissions were provided by the Landlord. Neither party has returned the Reply Forms sent to them with the Tribunal’s Directions.

5. From the information provided it appears that the property comprises of a detached bungalow. The accommodation comprises living room, dining room, kitchen, two bedrooms and bathroom. The property is assumed to have gas fired central heating. Based on internet mapping it is apparent that the property is relatively modern and appears to have UPVC double glazing. There are gardens to front and rear and a garage.

6. The tenant submits that there are some defects to the property:

1) The roof leaks in three places. 2) There is mould internally that has caused damage to beds and clothes. 3) There is damp around every window. 4) The tenant has put sealant round the living room window which was draughty.

7. The landlord has not made any submissions.

8. The Tribunal has considered the written submissions provided by the Tenant.

Determination and Valuation

9. Having considered the comparable evidence proved by the parties and of our own expert, knowledge of rental values in the area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in good tenantable condition would be in the region of £950.00 per month. From this level of rent we have made adjustments in relation to:

3 a) The condition of the property in respect of draughty windows and mould. b) Improvements made by the Tenant in sealing round the lounge window. c) The Tenant’s liability to redecorate.

10. The full valuation is shown below:

Market Rent

£950.00 per month

Less a) Items given under a) above

£20.00

b) Items given under b) above

£ 7.00 c) Tenant’s internal decoration liability @ 5% £47.50 £74.50

£74.50 £875.50

Say £875.00 per month Decision

12. The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy was £875.00 per month with effect from 21st August 2025.

Chairman: [NAME]: 2nd March 2026

APPEAL PROVISIONS

If either party is dissatisfied with this decision, they may apply for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) on any point of law arising from this Decision. Prior to making such an appeal, an application must be made, in writing, to this Tribunal for permission to appeal. Any such application must be made within 28 days of the issue of this statement of reasons (regulation 52 (2) of The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013) stating the grounds upon which it is intended to rely in the appeal.

4

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 7 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

[NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT] Mr [RESPONDENT]

Landlord [RESPONDENT] c/o [APPELLANT] 1 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

[NAME]

1. The rent is: £875.00 Per month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 21st August 2025

3. The amount included for services is/is not applicable N/A Per

4. Date assured tenancy commenced 21st July 2022 5. Length of the term or rental period 6 months 6. Allocation of liability for repairs Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None 8. Description of premises A detached bungalow comprising lounge, dining room, kitchen, two bedrooms and bathroom. Double glazing. Gardens to front and rear. Garage.

[NAME] of Decision 2nd March 2026

First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No.

BIR/17UC/MNR/2025/0793

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • Rent should be set at fair market value as determined by the First-tier Tribunal.
  • Rent must be adjusted based on the property's condition and any improvements made by the tenant.
  • Rent must reflect current market conditions and tenant responsibilities.
  • Rent proposal must be reasonable and supported by comparable evidence.
  • Rent assessment should consider the property's actual condition and tenant liabilities.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal determined the market rent for a property under an assured tenancy agreement.

Who was involved?

A tenant and their landlord were involved in setting the rental price.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on written submissions and online research, considering defects and improvements made by the tenant.

Which laws or rules were applied?

Housing Act 1988 sections 13 and 14 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The condition of the property and any necessary adjustments for defects and improvements made by the tenant mattered most.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was partially in favour of the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should consider defects and improvements when arguing for rent adjustments.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Written submissions from both parties and online research on property condition were important.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, either party can appeal the decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) based on points of law.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is advisable to seek legal advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.