VadeLab
Allowed in PartFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent at £1,230 for Assured Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

In this case, the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined a new rent of £1,230 for an assured tenancy property in Trench, Telford based on evidence and expert knowledge. The decision was made to ensure the proposed rent is fair and reasonable.

⚖️ Legal holding

A landlord may propose a new rent under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988, but the rent must be reasonable and supported by comparables.

Topics

tenancyrent determination

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.13

This section allows a landlord to propose a new rent for an assured periodic tenancy through a notice in a prescribed form. The new rent must take effect at the start of a new period specified in the notice, which begins at least two months after the notice is served. If the rent has been previously increased, the next increase can occur after a longer period, depending on the type of tenancy.

Housing Act 1988 s.14

A tenant under an assured tenancy can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the open-market rent that a willing landlord might expect to receive for the property under similar conditions.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined the market rent for an assured tenancy property based on comparable evidence and expert knowledge of rental values in the area.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined the market rent of a semi-detached property in Trench, Telford to be £1,230 per month based on comparable evidence and expert knowledge. The decision took effect from October 13th, 2025.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed in Part

© CROWN COPYRIGHT

Case Reference

: BIR/OOGF/MNR/2025/0796

Property : 46 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Tenant

: [APPELLANT]

Landlord : [NAME] (SW11) [RESPONDENT] agent : [COMPANY] of application : 2nd September 2025

Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988

Tribunal Members : Mr [NAME] Mrs [NAME] Mr [NAME] of Decision : 9th March 2026

_______________________________________________

DECISION

The Tribunal determines a rent of £1,230.00 per month with effect from 13th October 2025 ____________________________________

FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

2

REASONS FOR THE DECISION Background

1. On 6th August 2025 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £1,250.00 per month in place of the existing rent of £1,185.00 to take effect from 13th October 2025.

2. On 2nd September 2025, under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent.

Inspection

3. The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties and having regard to its own knowledge, expertise and online research.

Evidence

4. The Tribunal has considered the written submissions provided by the Tenant and the Landlord.

5. From the information provided it appears that the property comprises of a semi-detached house with living room, kitchen, ground floor W.C., two double bedrooms, one single bedroom and bathroom. There is understood to be central heating and double glazing.

6. Outside are gardens and car parking space.

7. The tenant submits that they have provided carpets, curtains and central heating.

8. The tenant submits various comparable evidence of semi-detached and terraced properties with similar accommodation at rentals between £895.00 - £1,150.00 per month.

9. The landlord submits that carpets, curtains and white goods are provided by the landlord. This is in contradiction of the submission of the tenant. The Tribunal is persuaded that certainly the central heating will have been provided by the landlord although the running costs will be the responsibility of the tenant.

10. The landlord submits, as comparable evidence various three-bedroom semi-detached properties in [ADDRESS] under the agent’s management at rentals between £1,250.00 - £1,295.00 per month. In addition, further comparables were provided in the nearby area of properties let between £1,250.00 - £1,270.00 per month.

11. The Tribunal has considered the written submissions provided by the Tenant and the Landlord.

3

Determination and Valuation

12. Having considered the comparable evidence proved by the parties and of our own expert, knowledge of rental values in the area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in good tenantable condition would be in the region of £1,295.00 per month. From this level of rent we have made adjustments in relation to:

a) The Tenant’s liability to redecorate.

13. The full valuation is shown below:

Market Rent

£1,295.00 per month

Less a) Tenant’s internal decoration liability @ 5% £65.00

£65.00

Say £1,230.00 Decision

12. The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy was £1230.00 per month with effect from 13th October 2025.

Chairman: [NAME]: 9th October 2026

APPEAL PROVISIONS

If either party is dissatisfied with this decision, they may apply for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) on any point of law arising from this Decision. Prior to making such an appeal, an application must be made, in writing, to this Tribunal for permission to appeal. Any such application must be made within 28 days of the issue of this statement of reasons (regulation 52 (2) of The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013) stating the grounds upon which it is intended to rely in the appeal.

4

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 46 [NAME] [POSTCODE]

[NAME] Mrs [RESPONDENT] Mr [RESPONDENT]

Landlord [NAME] (SW11) [RESPONDENT] c/o [COMPANY] 145 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Tenant [NAME]

1. The rent is: £1,230.00 Per Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 13th October 2025

3. The amount included for services is/is not applicable N/A Per

4. Date assured tenancy commenced 13th October 2023 5. Length of the term or rental period 12 Months 6. Allocation of liability for repairs Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None 8. Description of premises A semi-detached house comprising living room, kitchen, ground floor W.C, two double bedrooms, one single bedroom, bathroom. Central heating. Double glazing. Garden. Parking.

[NAME] of Decision 9th March 2026

First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No.

BIR/OOGF/MNR/2025/0796

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The landlord provided comparables showing similar properties rented at £1,250.00 to £1,295.00 per month.
  • The tribunal adjusted the proposed rent by 5% to account for the tenant's liability to redecorate.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • The tenant claimed they had provided carpets and curtains, which was contradicted by the landlord's evidence accepted by the tribunal.
  • The tenant's comparables were between £895.00 - £1,150.00 per month, lower than what the tribunal found reasonable after considering all evidence.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal set a new market rent of £1,230 per month for an assured tenancy property.

Who was involved?

A tenant and a landlord were involved in the case.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on comparable evidence provided by both parties and expert knowledge of rental values in the area.

Which laws or rules were applied?

Housing Act 1988 sections 13 and 14 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The comparable evidence provided by both parties regarding similar properties in the area was crucial.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was partially in favour of the tenant, as the rent proposed was slightly lower than what the landlord requested.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone facing a rent increase can challenge it by providing comparable evidence to show that the proposed rent is not reasonable.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Comparable rental prices of similar properties and expert knowledge on local market conditions were important.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, either party can apply for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) within 28 days if they are dissatisfied with the decision.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is advisable to seek legal advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent determination.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.