VadeLab
Allowed in PartFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent at £980 Per Month

Case No.

📌 In brief

In this case, the First-tier Tribunal determined that the fair market rent for a property should be set at £980 per calendar month, taking into account evidence provided by both parties and expert knowledge of local rental conditions. The decision was effective from June 2026.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to have their rent determined by a fair representation of current market conditions, considering the state of repair and condition of the property.

Topics

tenancyrent determination

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under this section, a tenant can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their assured tenancy, provided that the rent is not pursuant to a previous determination under this section and more than six months have not elapsed since the start of the tenancy.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

Tribunal determines market rent for a property based on evidence and expert knowledge of rental values in the area.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal determined the fair market rent for a property based on evidence and expert knowledge, setting it at £980 per month effective from June 2026. The decision considered comparable rental values in the area and the condition of the property.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed in Part

© CROWN COPYRIGHT Case Reference : BIR/44UC/MNR/2026/0063 Property : 48 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Tenant : [NAME] [COUNSEL] & [COUNSEL] Landlord : [COUNSEL] as Agent for Landlord Landlord’s agent : [NAME] of application : 24th March 2026 Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent Sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988 Tribunal Members : T W Jones FRICS K Bentley Date of Decision : 16th June 2026 _______________________________________________

DECISION The Tribunal determines a rent of £980 (Nine Hundred and Eighty Pounds) per calendar month with effect from 16th June 2026 ____________________________________ FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

2

REASONS FOR THE

DECISION Background 1. On 19th November 2025 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £1100 per calendar month in place of the existing rent of £800 pcm to take effect from 13th January 2026.

2. On 24th March 2026, under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent. Inspection 3. The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties and having regard to its own knowledge, expertise and online research. Evidence 4. The Tribunal considered the written submissions provided by the Tenant and the Landlord. From the brief information provided it appears that the subject property is a semi-detached dwelling house with accommodation comprising entrance porch, entrance hallway, living room, dining room, kitchen, 3 bedrooms, bathroom and separate WC. To the front the property benefits from a bricked pavier driveway leading to a parking area and detached single garage. There are also gardens to front and rear.

5. The property is let on an Assured Shorthold Tenancy incorporating standard repairing obligations.

6. The Tenant submitted details including photographic evidence of what they consider to be repairs required to the property together with a copy letter from Nuneaton and Bedworth Borough Council dated 5 November 2025 addressed to the occupier of the subject property outlining details of their inspection of the same date with attached schedules of remedial action to be undertaken by 3 December 2025 and 7 January 2026.

7. The Tenant further submitted to the Tribunal their knowledge of a newly built property located approximately 4 minutes away which in their opinion was in a significantly better condition than the subject property with a rental value of £1300 per month in addition to a Rightmove pro forma sheet of [ADDRESS] advertised as “let agreed” at £1325 the calendar month.

3 8. The Landlord submitted that the average rent for a three-bedroom semi- detached home is £1400 per calendar month, they have a 3rd floor apartment in a similar location rented out that week for £995 per calendar month and the “rate offered” by the tenant would equate to the current value of a 2-bedroom apartment in the least desirable areas of the town. Determination and Valuation 9. Having considered the comparable evidence provided by the Landlord and Tenant together with our own expert knowledge of rental values in the area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in its current state of repair and condition to be fairly represented by the sum of £980 per calendar month. Decision 10. The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy was £980 per calendar month with effect from 13th January 2026. Hardship 11. The Tenant raises hardship in their submissions.

Accordingly, the Tribunal directs the new rent of £980 per calendar month is to take effect from 16th June 2026 this being the date of the Tribunal. Chairman: Date: 16th June 2026 APPEAL PROVISIONS If either party is dissatisfied with this decision, they may apply for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) on any point of law arising from this Decision. Prior to making such an appeal, an application must be made, in writing, to this Tribunal for permission to appeal. Any such application must be made within 28 days of the issue of this statement of reasons (regulation 52 (2) of The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013) stating the grounds upon which it is intended to rely in the appeal.

4 Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination) Housing Act 1988 Section 14 Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 48 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] T W Jones K Bentley Landlord [COUNSEL], [NAME] as Agent for Landlord [NAME], [ADDRESS], Nuneaton. [POSTCODE] Tenant [NAME] & [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £980 Per calendar month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 16th June 2026 3. The amount included for services is not applicable Per 4. Date assured tenancy commenced 13th May 2017 5. Length of the term or rental period 6 months 6. Allocation of liability for repairs Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None 8. Description of premises 3 bedroom & 2 reception room semi-detached dwelling house with garage and gardens to front and rear. Chairman Date of Decision 16th June 2026 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. BIR/44UC/MNR/2026/0063

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The rent should reflect current market conditions.
  • Adjustments can be made to the proposed rent due to property defects.
  • Rent increases must be reasonable and supported by evidence of similar properties.
  • Fair market rent should consider the property's condition and location.
  • A fair rent should reflect market values adjusted for specific tenancy terms.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal determined the fair market rent for a property to be £980 per month.

Who was involved?

A tenant and a landlord were involved in the dispute over rent determination.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court considered evidence from both parties and expert knowledge of local rental conditions to determine the fair market rent.

Which laws or rules were applied?

Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988 were applied in this case.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The evidence provided by both parties regarding comparable rental values and property condition was crucial to the decision.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was partially in favour of the tenant, setting a lower rent than proposed by the landlord.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone facing a rent increase can seek a fair market determination based on comparable rental values and property condition.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Photographic evidence of repairs needed, inspection reports from local authorities, and information about comparable properties were important.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, either party can apply for permission to appeal the decision on a point of law within 28 days.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is advisable to seek legal advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent determination.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.