VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Tribunal Sets Fair Rent of £975 Per Month for Property

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal set the fair rent for a property in Horsmonden, Kent, to £975 per month. The decision was based on an assessment of market value adjusted for specific conditions like improvements made by the tenant.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair rent that reflects market values adjusted for specific tenancy terms.

Topics

fair rent determinationRent Act 1977

Provisions

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined the fair rent for a property under the Rent Act 1977, considering market value and tenancy conditions.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal determined the fair rent for a property at £975 per month, considering market value and adjustments based on tenancy terms such as improvements made by the tenant.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

FR27 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. HAV/29UQ/F77/2026/0007

Notice of the Tribunal Decision

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 3 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

[NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT]

Landlord [NAME] (Yalding) Ltd

Tenant Mrs [APPELLANT]

1. The fair rent is £975.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)

2. The effective date is 10 April 2026

3. The amount for services is

Per

negligible

4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is

n/a Per n/a

not applicable

5. The rent is not to be registered as variable.

6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf)

7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry

The landlord maintains the shared private drainage system.

8. For information only:

(a)The fair rent to be registered is not limited by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999, because it is below the maximum fair rent of £1,181.00 per [NAME] of decision 10 April 2026

FR27 MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION

LATEST RPI FIGURE X 408.2

PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 292.6

X 408.2 Minus Y 292.6 = (A) 115.6

(A) 115.6 Divided by Y 292.6 = (B) 0.395

First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 YES/NO

If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C)

If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.445

Last registered rent* £817.00 Multiplied by (C) = £1,180.56 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)

Rounded up to nearest 50p = £1,181.00

Variable service charge NO If YES add amount for services

MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £1,181.00 Per Calendar Month

Explanatory Note

1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.

2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:

(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and

(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).

A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).

The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.

3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.

4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.

1

Case Reference

: HAV/29UQ/F77/2026/0007

Property : 3 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Tenant

: [NAME]

Landlord : [NAME] ([RESPONDENT] of Landlord’s Objection : 18 February 2026

Type of Application : Section 70, Rent Act 1977

Tribunal

: Mr [NAME] [NAME] Mr [NAME] of Summary Reasons : 10 April 2026

_______________________________________________

DECISION

The sum of £975.00 per month will be registered as the fair rent with effect from 10 April 2026, being the date the Tribunal made the Decision. ____________________________________

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2025

FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

2 SUMMARY REASONS

Background

1. Following an objection from the Landlord to the determination of a fair rent by the Rent Officer, the Tribunal has made a determination under the provisions of the Rent Act 1977.

2. The parties did not request a hearing or an inspection to determine this matter and the Tribunal agreed with this arrangement. The Tribunal considered this case with the Rent Officer’s calculations and with the assistance of Rightmove and Google Maps.

Evidence

3. The Tribunal did not receive a completed Rent Appeal Statement from the parties. In a letter dated 2 January 2026 from the [NAME], Mr [APPELLANT], he set out a list of the improvements undertaken by the Tenant during the term of the tenancy which commenced circa 1965. There is slight confusion regarding this letter as it has a different reference as to the subject property and presumably refers to 1 Gaffords Bridge Cottages. The Tribunal had before it, the Rent Officers two Registrations and calculations for the most recent registration on the 12 February 2026 to take effect on that date.

Determination and Valuation

4. Having consideration of its own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the Tonbridge area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in good condition with modern services would be in the region of £1,350 per month.

5. Next, the Tribunal needs to adjust that hypothetical rent of £1,350 per month to allow for Terms of tenancy agreement, no white goods, no carpets or curtains, tenants improvements which include replacement kitchen and bathroom fittings, installation of LPG central heating system, garage, front porch, summer house (conservatory) garden sheds and boundary fencing.

6. The Tribunal has considered very carefully the information provided by the Tenant. Using its own expertise, the Tribunal considers that a deduction of £375 should be applied in order to take account of the above matters. This reduces the figure to £975 per month.

7. It should be noted that this figure cannot be a simple arithmetical calculation and is not based upon capital costs but is the Tribunal’s estimate of the amount by which the rent would need to be reduced to attract a tenant.

8. The Tribunal has not made an adjustment for scarcity.

9. The full valuation is shown below:

3

Market Rent £1,350 pm

Less

approx. £375

£975.00

£975.00 pm

Decision

10. The uncapped fair rent initially determined by the Tribunal, for the purposes of section 70, was £975.00 per month. The capped rent for the property according to the provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 is calculated at £1,181 per calendar month. The calculation of the capped rent is shown on the decision form.

11. In this case therefore the lower rent of £975.00 per month is to be registered as the fair rent for this property.

APPEAL PROVISIONS

These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The rent is adjusted to reflect market values.
  • The rent is capped at the maximum fair rent as prescribed by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.
  • The rent reflects the property's condition and location.
  • Improvements made by the tenant are considered in determining the fair rent.
  • The rent reflects the current state and location of the property.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The fair rent for a property in Horsmonden, Kent, was set at £975 per month.

Who was involved?

A tenant and their landlord were involved in the case.

How did the court decide, and why?

The Tribunal considered market value adjusted for specific tenancy conditions such as improvements made by the tenant.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11 was used to determine the fair rent.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The adjustments based on specific tenancy conditions, such as improvements made by the tenant, influenced the decision.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision supported the tenant's position.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation can use market value and specific tenancy conditions to argue for fair rent determination.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Rent Officer’s calculations, Rightmove data, Google Maps information were considered.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions from the First-tier Tribunal can often be appealed to higher courts.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is advisable to consult with a qualified solicitor for specific advice on similar cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.