VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Sets Capped Fair Rent for Property

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on a fair rent for a property in London, setting it at £170.50 per week after applying the maximum fair rent formula and considering recent improvements made by the landlord.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a capped fair rent as prescribed by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 when an application is made under section 70 of the Rent Act 1977.

Topics

tenancyfair rent determination

Provisions

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined the fair rent for a property under the Rent Act 1977, applying the maximum fair rent formula and considering improvements made by the landlord.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined the fair rent for a property in London, applying the maximum fair rent formula under the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 and considering recent improvements made by the landlord. The capped fair rent was set at £170.50 per week.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

FR27 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00AH/F77/2025/0306

Notice of the Tribunal Decision

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Mr. [RESPONDENT]

Landlord [APPELLANT] c/o [NAME]

Tenant Mr

1. The fair rent is £170.50 Per Week (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)

2. The effective date is 7 January 2026

3. The amount for services is £12.63 Per Week

4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is

Per

None

5. The rent is not to be registered as variable.

6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf).

7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry

None

8. For information only:

(a) The fair rent to be registered is the maximum fair rent as prescribed by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999. The rent that would otherwise have been registered was £264.00 per week. (b) .

[NAME] of decision 7 January 2026

FR27 MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION

LATEST RPI FIGURE X 405.6

PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 378.4

X 405.6 Minus Y 378.4 = (A) 27.2

(A) 27.2 Divided by Y 378.4 = (B) 0.07

First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 - NO

If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C) N/A

If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.12

Last registered rent* 152 Multiplied by (C) = 170.24 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)

Rounded up to nearest 50p = 170.50

Variable service charge No If YES add amount for services

MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = 170.50 Per Week

Explanatory Note

1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.

2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:

(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and

(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).

A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).

The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.

3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.

4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.

1

Case Reference

: LON/00AH/F77/2025/0306

Property : [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Tenant

: Mrs [APPELLANT]

Landlord : [APPELLANT] [NAME] of Tenants Objection : 29 September 2025

Type of Application : Section 70, Rent Act 1977

Tribunal

: Mr [NAME] of Summary Reasons : 7 January 2026

_______________________________________________

DECISION

The sum of £170.50.00 per calendar week will be registered as the fair rent with effect from 7 January 2026, being the date, the Tribunal made the Decision. ____________________________________

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2025

FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

2 SUMMARY REASONS

Background

1. Following an objection from the Landlord to the determination of a fair rent by the Rent Officer, the Tribunal has made a determination under the provisions of the Rent Act 1977.

2. The parties did not request a hearing or an inspection.to determine this matter and the Tribunal agreed with this arrangement. The Tribunal considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties and the Rent Officer with the assistance of Rightmove and Google Maps

Evidence

3. The Tribunal received a completed Reply Statements from the Landlords agent. No comparable evidence of rental levels in the area was provided. The Tribunal had before it, the Rent Officers two Registrations and calculations for the most recent registration on the 12 September 2025 to take effect on the 27 September 2025.

Determination and Valuation

4. Having consideration of the Landlords evidence and our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the South Norwood area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in its current condition would be in the region of £440 per week. (approximately £1900 per month) From this level of rent we have made adjustments in relation to:

Terms of tenancy agreement, no white goods, no carpets or curtains, dated kitchen fittings. This equates to approximately 25%

The Tribunal has taken into consideration the improvements undertaken by the Landlord in 2024 which comprise a replacement heating system and installation of double glazed windows

5. The Tribunal has also made an adjustment for scarcity at 20%

6. The full valuation is shown below:

Market Rent £440 pw

Less

approx.25% £110

3

£330

Less Scarcity

approx. 20%

£66

£264 pw

Decision

7. The uncapped fair rent initially determined by the Tribunal, for the purposes of section 70, was £264.00 per calendar week. The capped rent for the property according to the provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 is calculated at £170.50 per calendar week. The calculation of the capped rent is shown on the decision form.

8. In this case therefore the lower rent of £170.50 per calendar week is to be registered as the fair rent for this property.

Chairman: [NAME]: 7 January 2026

APPEAL PROVISIONS

These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant is entitled to a fair rent that reflects the condition of the property.
  • The tenant is entitled to have their rent capped at the maximum fair rent as prescribed by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.
  • The tenant is entitled to a fair rent that reflects market conditions adjusted for specific property characteristics.
  • The tenant is entitled to a fair rent that reflects the property's condition and location, adjusted according to statutory formulas.
  • The tenant is entitled to a fair rent that reflects the current state and location of their property, adjusted for improvements made by the tenant.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The First-tier Tribunal set the fair rent for a property in London at £170.50 per week.

Who was involved?

A tenant and their landlord were involved, with the tribunal considering evidence from both parties.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court applied the maximum fair rent formula under the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 and considered recent improvements made by the landlord.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The application of the maximum fair rent formula and consideration of recent landlord improvements were key to the decision.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was in favour of the tenant, setting a lower fair rent than initially proposed by the landlord.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation may benefit from having recent improvements to their property considered when determining fair rent.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Evidence of recent improvements made by the landlord and comparable rental levels were important.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions can often be appealed if there are grounds for doing so under relevant laws.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is advisable to seek legal advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving fair rent determinations.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.