VadeLab
Allowed in PartFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Determines Market Rent for Semi-Detached Property

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal assessed the market rent for a semi-detached house based on its condition and similar properties in the area. The final rent was set at £695 per month, effective from October 1st, 2025.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to have the market rent of their property assessed by the First-tier Tribunal based on comparable evidence and the property's condition.

Topics

tenancyrent assessment

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

This section allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the open-market rent based on the conditions and terms of the existing tenancy.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined the market rent for a semi-detached house in Castle Gresley, considering its condition and amenities.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal determined the market rent of a semi-detached house in Castle Gresley, considering its condition and comparable properties. The rent was set at £695 per month.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed in Part

© CROWN COPYRIGHT

Case Reference

: BIR/17UK/MNR/2025/0807

Property : 141 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Tenant

: [APPELLANT]

Landlord : [NAME]

Landlord’s agent : [RESPONDENT] of application : 12th September 2025

Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988

Tribunal Members : Mr [NAME] Mr [NAME] Mr [NAME] of Decision : 2nd March 2026

_______________________________________________

DECISION

The Tribunal determines a rent of £695.00 per month with effect from 1st October 2025. ____________________________________

FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

2 REASONS FOR THE DECISION Background

1. On 19th August 2025 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £663.00 per month in place of the existing rent of £625.00 take effect from 1st October 2025.

2. On 12th September 2025, under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent.

Inspection

3. The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties and having regard to its own knowledge, expertise and online research.

Evidence

4. The Tribunal has considered the written submissions provided by the Tenant and the Landlord.

5. From the information provided it appears that the property comprises of a semi-detached house with one living room, kitchen, three bedrooms and bathroom. There is understood to be double glazing throughout and gas fired central heating. Outside is a garden and driveway. It is understood that the tenancy does not include white goods, carpets or curtains.

6. The tenant submits that the boiler is faulty and does not always work correctly. Two radiators are also not working. In addition, there is some black mould which is having an adverse effect on the tenant and her daughter. The local authority Environmental Health department have been involved.

7. The tenant further submits that the landlord has served her with Notice to Quit.

8. Based on the photographs provided the Tribunal considers that the kitchen would benefit from upgrading.

9. The landlord submits that the Environmental Health Department have found no Category 1 or category 2 hazards. It was noted that the tenant disagrees with this assessment. There was no evidence of water ingress but fans had been fitted to improve the ventilation.

10. The landlord further submitted that all the radiators were working and that at the tenants request he had bled one of them. The boiler was serviced annually.

11. The landlord submits that similar properties in the area are let at rents in the region of £750.00 - £1,050.00 per month.

12. The Tribunal has considered the written submissions provided by the Tenant and the Landlord.

3 Determination and Valuation

13. Having considered the comparable evidence proved by the parties and of our own expert, knowledge of rental values in the area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in good tenantable condition would be in the region of £850.00 per month. From this level of rent we have made adjustments in relation to:

a) Condition – kitchen update, some mould and roof leaks. b) Curtains, carpets and white goods fitted provided by the tenant. c) The Tenant’s liability to redecorate.

14. The full valuation is shown below:

Market Rent

£850.00 per month

Less a) Items given under a) above

£62.00

b) Items given under b) above

£50.00 c) Tenant’s internal decoration liability @ 5% £42.50 £154.50

£154.50 per month

£695.50 per month

Say £695.00 per month Decision

15. The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy was £695.00 per month with effect from 1st October 2025.

Chairman: [NAME]: 2nd March 2026

APPEAL PROVISIONS

If either party is dissatisfied with this decision, they may apply for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) on any point of law arising from this Decision. Prior to making such an appeal, an application must be made, in writing, to this Tribunal for permission to appeal. Any such application must be made within 28 days of the issue of this statement of reasons (regulation 52 (2) of The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013) stating the grounds upon which it is intended to rely in the appeal.

4

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 141 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

[NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT] Mr [RESPONDENT]

Landlord [NAME] 90 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Tenant [NAME]

1. The rent is: £695.00 Per month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 1st October 2025

3. The amount included for services is/is not applicable N/A Per

4. Date assured tenancy commenced 1st November 2022

5. Length of the term or rental period 12 months 6. Allocation of liability for repairs Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None 8. Description of premises A semi-detached house comprising one living room, kitchen, three bedrooms and bathroom. Double glazing. Central heating. Gardens and driveway.

[NAME] of Decision 2nd march 2026

First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No.

BIR/17UK/MNR/2025/0807

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The rent must be based on current market conditions.
  • The property's condition must be considered when setting the rent.
  • Rent increases must be supported by evidence of similar properties.
  • Reasonable rent increases must be adjusted for property improvements made by tenants.
  • Landlord's proposed rent must reflect tenant responsibilities.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The market rent for a semi-detached house was determined to be £695 per month.

Who was involved?

A tenant and the landlord's agent were involved in the case.

How did the court decide, and why?

The Tribunal considered comparable evidence and the property’s condition to determine a fair market rent.

Which laws or rules were applied?

Housing Act 1988 sections 13 and 14 were applied in this case.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The condition of the property, including issues with the kitchen and some mould, influenced the rent determination.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was partially in favour of the tenant as it set a lower rent than initially proposed by the landlord's agent.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone facing a rent increase can seek a tribunal assessment to ensure fair market conditions are considered.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Photographs of the property and written submissions from both parties were crucial.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Either party may apply for permission to appeal on points of law within 28 days.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is advisable to seek legal advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.