VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Sloane Square Property

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on the fair rent for a property in the address, London, setting the rent at £39,513.50 per year after considering the property's condition and market conditions.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair rent determined by the Tribunal based on the Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.

Topics

fair rent determinationrent act 1977maximum fair rent

Provisions

Rent Act 1977Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined the fair rent for a property in the address, London, considering various factors including the condition of the property and market conditions.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined the fair rent for a property in Sloane Square, London, considering the condition of the property and market conditions, resulting in a fair rent of £39,513.50 per annum.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

1

Case Reference

: LON/00AW/F77/2025/0284

Property : Flat 1, [NAME], 32/[ADDRESS], London [POSTCODE]

Tenant

: Mr [APPELLANT]

Landlord : [APPELLANT] c/0 [RESPONDENT] of Landlords Objection : 17 September 2025

Type of Application : Section 70, Rent Act 1977

Tribunal

: Mr [NAME] of Summary Reasons : 14 January 2026

_______________________________________________

DECISION

The sum of £39,513.50 per annum will be registered as the fair rent with effect from 14 January 2026, being the date, the Tribunal made the Decision. ____________________________________

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2025

FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

2 SUMMARY REASONS

Background

1. Following an objection from the Landlord to the determination of a fair rent by the Rent Officer, the Tribunal has made a determination under the provisions of the Rent Act 1977.

2. The parties did not request a hearing or an inspection to determine this matter and the Tribunal agreed with this arrangement. The Tribunal considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties and the Rent Officer with the assistance of Rightmove and Google Maps

Evidence

3. The Tribunal received completed Reply Statements from the parties together with comprehensive written representaionsrepresentations from the Landlords agent. This included comparable evidence of rental levels in the building and adjacent blocks togthertogether with a valuation calculation. The Tribunal had before it, the Rent Officers two Registrations and calculations for the most recent registration on the 21 August 2025 to take effect on that date.

Determination and Valuation

4. Having consideration of the Landlords evidence and our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the [ADDRESS] area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in its current condition would be in the region of £85,800 per annum. (approximately £7,150 per month) From this level of rent we have made adjustments in relation to:

Terms of tenancy agreement, no white goods, no carpets or curtains, central heating installed by tenants and dated kitchen and bathroom fittings which the Tribunal were installed in 2000 when the property was refurbished.. This equates to approximately 40%

The Tribunal has taken into consideration the general refurbishment undertaken by the Landlord in 2000.

5. The Tribunal has also made an adjustment for scarcity at 20%

6. The full valuation is shown below:

Market Rent £85,800 pa

Less

approx.40% £34,320

3

£51,480

Less Scarcity

approx. 20%

£10,296

£41,184 pa

Decision

7. The uncapped fair rent initially determined by the Tribunal, for the purposes of section 70, was £41,184 per annum. The capped rent for the property according to the provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 is calculated at £39,513.50 per calendar annum. The calculation of the capped rent is shown on the decision form.

8. In this case therefore the lower rent of £39,513.50 per annum is to be registered as the fair rent for this property.

Chairman: Duncan Jagger MRICS Date: 14 January 2026

APPEAL PROVISIONS

These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of Formatted: Left

4 how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA

FR27 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00AW/F77/2025/0284

Notice of the Tribunal Decision

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were Flat 1 [NAME], 32/[ADDRESS], London [POSTCODE]

Mr. D Jagger MRICS

Landlord [APPELLANT] c/o [APPELLANT]

[NAME]

1. The fair rent is £39,513.50 Per Annum (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)

2. The effective date is 14 January 2026

3. The amount for services is

Per

None

4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is

Per

None

5. The rent is not to be registered as variable.

6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf).

7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry

None

8. For information only:

(a) The fair rent to be registered is the maximum fair rent as prescribed by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999. The rent that would otherwise have been registered was £41,184 per annum. (b) .

Chairman Mr. D Jagger MRICS

Date of decision 14 January 2026

FR27 MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION

LATEST RPI FIGURE X 405.6

PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 374.2

X 405.6 Minus Y 374.2 = (A) 31.4

(A) 31.4 Divided by Y 374.2 = (B) 0.08

First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 - NO

If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C) N/A

If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.13

Last registered rent* 34,967.50 Multiplied by (C) = 39,513.27 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)

Rounded up to nearest 50p = 39,513.50

Variable service charge No If YES add amount for services

MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = 39,513.50 Per Annum

Explanatory Note

1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.

2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:

(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and

(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).

A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).

The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.

3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.

4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 10 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant is entitled to a fair rent determined by the Tribunal based on the Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.
  • The fair rent takes into account the open market value and adjusts for the property's condition and terms of tenancy.
  • Fair rent is adjusted according to the condition and features of the property.
  • Fair rent reflects current market conditions and the tenant's obligations.
  • The fair rent is subject to the capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The fair rent for a property in the address, London, was set at £39,513.50 per annum.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved in the case.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court considered the property's condition and market conditions to determine the fair rent.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The condition of the property and market conditions were the most important factors.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation can expect their fair rent to be determined based on the property's condition and market conditions.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The evidence included the condition of the property, comparable rental levels, and a valuation calculation.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed through the appropriate legal channels.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving fair rent determinations.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.