VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Market Rent for Property Condition

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal adjusted the proposed rent for a property based on its condition and wear and tear, setting the new rent at £2,850 per month.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a market rent adjustment based on the property's condition and wear and tear.

Topics

tenancy disputesmarket rent determination

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

This section allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the rent at which the property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal adjusted the proposed rent to reflect the property's condition and wear and tear.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal adjusted the proposed rent for a property from £3,400 to £2,850 per month, considering the property's condition and wear and tear.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. HS/LON/00AQ/MNR/2024/0128

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 35 [ADDRESS] , [POSTCODE]

[NAME]

Mr O N MILLER

Landlord [NAME] 6 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[APPELLANT] & [NAME] [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £ 2,850.00 Per Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 3rd July 2024

*3. The amount included for services is not applicable Nil Per

*4. Service charges are variable and are not included

5. Date assured tenancy commenced 8TH October 2023

6. Length of the term or rental period Monthly

7. Allocation of liability for repairs Landlord Repairs

8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None

9. Description of premises A semi-detached property originally bult to two storeys with the addition of a bedroom and bathroom in the loft and single storey additions

Chairman [NAME] of Decision 3rd JULY 2024

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

Case Reference : HS/LON/00AQ/MNR/2024/0128

Hearing Type : [ADDRESS] of Written Representation and Oral Hearing

Property : 35 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Applicant: [redacted]

Respondent: [redacted] : Referral in Respect of Market Rent Under Section 13 of the Housing Act 1988

Tribunal Members : [NAME] Chairman

Mr O N Miller .

Date of Inspection : 3 July 2024

Date of Full Reasons : 3 July 2024

STATEMENT OF FULL REASONS ON AN [NAME] FOR DETERMINATION OF A MARKET RENT UNDER S. 13 AND 14 OF THE HOUSING ACT 1988.

2

REASONS

Background

1. On 26 February 2024 the landlord served a Notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 proposing an increase in the rent of the above property from the passing rent of £2,400 per month to £3,400 per month from 8 April 2024.

2. On 1 March 2024 the [APPELLANT] made an [NAME] to the Tribunal for the determination of a market rent.

3. The original tenancy is believed to have begun 8 October 2022.

4. The [APPELLANT] occupies the property by way of an Assured Periodic Tenancy.

5. By way of a letter dated 17 May 2024, the Tribunal issued directions. These required the landlord to provide details of evidence on which they wished to rely by way of reply by 7 June 2024. The [APPELLANT] was directed to do the same by 21 June 2024 and the landlord was given until 28 June 2024 for his response thereto.

6. On 13th June 2024 the Tribunal wrote to the parties confirming details for a hearing and inspection to take place on 3 July 2024.

7. Both parties took the opportunity to make submissions.

8. On the [NAME], the [APPELLANT] states that they have painted the staircase and cupboards.

9. The tenants did not submit the Reply form.

10. By way of letter dated 21 September 2003, the landlord states the rental value of the property is £3,600 per calendar month. Photographs of the kitchen, bathroom, bedrooms, conservatory and dining room are provided.It is noted that Foxtons state that this rent should be an asking rent.

11. In the landlord’s Reply form the property is a five bedroom property with a converted loft creating the fourth bedroom and bathroom, with a further fifth bedroom at ground level

3

12. .The landlord advises that the kitchen was refitted in 2017 and provided photographs of each room.

13. Finally, the landlord pointed out that the property is only 7 minutes’ walk of North Harrow Underground station.

14. Despite a hearing scheduled for 10.00 am on the morning of 3 July 2024, neither party was in attendance

15. On 3 July 2024, on the basis of a hearing and inspection of the property, the Tribunal determined the Market rent of the above property at £2,850 per calendar month.

Inspection

16. The Tribunal attended the property to undertake an inspection at 1.00 pm on 3 July 2024.

17. It was apparent that the property was originally constructed as a two storey semi- detached dwellinghouse comprising three bedrooms. This has subsequently been extended by the provision of a further bedroom and en-suite within the loft space and an extension to the rear providing a lean-to conservatory and an additional room.

18. The accommodation comprises:

Ground floor: entrance hall, through lounge, conservatory, kitchen, rear room, shower room / WC. First floor: 3 bedrooms, bathroom / WC. Loft floor: bedroom 4, en-suite WC.

Externally, there are garden areas front and rear.

19. During the inspection, both applicants were present.

20. Neither the landlord nor any representative on his behalf were present.

21. On arrival the Tribunal notified the parties that they should be provided with access to all possible areas of the property but that she could not provide any additional

4

evidence nor engage in conversation about the property nor the rental value thereof.

22. All rooms were accessible.

23. In the ground floor rear room, access was severely limited by the number of items stored therein.

24. At the time of inspection, the property was found to be in reasonable condition, both internally and externally. That said, the Tribunal was of the opinion that the property is now showing significant signs of wear and tear with fixtures and fittings beginning to show their age .This is particularly so in the areas of the kitchen and various bath / shower rooms all of which need some attention.

The Law

25. When determining a market rent in accordance with the Housing Act 1988 Section 13 regard must be had to all of the circumstances (other than personal circumstances) including the age, location and state of repair of the property, matters contained within the rent, repairing obligations, etc. This means that issues such as the [APPELLANT]’s ability to pay the rent or bills associated with the property are not a consideration for the tribunal in assessing the rent.

Valuation

26. Following consideration of the written and photographic submissions given by the parties, and taking into account the Tribunal’s inspection and using its own knowledge and experience of the rental market in the North Harrow area, the Tribunal finds that the market rental value of the property, if it was in good condition, would be £3,100 per month.

27. Taking into account evidence of some disrepair and general wear and tear, the Tribunal considers it necessary to adjust that market rental value to reflect this.

28. Taking these and other more general factors into consideration, the Tribunal finds that it is necessary to make a £250 per month deduction in the market rental value of the property to reflect its condition and general wear and tear.

Valuation Calculation

5

29. Open market rent £3,100 per month

Deduction for adjustments detailed above

£ 250 per month

Adjusted rent £2,850 per month

The Tribunal therefore determines that the market rental value of the property should be set at a figure of £2,850 per month.

Chairman:

[NAME] Chairman

Date: 3rd July 2024

6

ANNEX OF RIGHTS FOR MARKET RENTS

By Rule 36(2) of the Tribunal procedure, (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013 the Tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they might have.

If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written [NAME] for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the regional office which has been dealing with this case

The [NAME] for permission to appeal must arrive at the regional office within 28 days after the Tribunal sends written reasons for the Decision to the [NAME].

If the [NAME] is not made within the 28 day time limit, such [NAME] must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the Tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the [NAME] for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit.

The [NAME] for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property, and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party [NAME] the [NAME] is seeking. Any appeal in respect of the Housing Act 1988 should be on a point of law.

If the Tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further [NAME] for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The landlord must consider the tenant’s improvements when setting the market rent.
  • The market rent should reflect the property's condition and lack of modernisation.
  • The tenant is entitled to a rent adjustment based on the property's condition and the tenant's responsibilities.
  • The rent must be determined according to the Housing Act 1988.
  • The rent should be reduced if the property is in poor condition.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal adjusted the proposed rent for a property based on its condition and wear and tear.

Who was involved?

A tenant and a landlord were involved in a dispute over the rent for a property.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided to adjust the proposed rent to reflect the property's condition and wear and tear.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 sections 13 and 14 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the condition and wear and tear of the property.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should consider the condition and wear and tear of the property when disputing rent.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Photographs and descriptions of the property's condition were important.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases like this.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.