VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Due to Undue Hardship

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal adjusted the rent from £1,500 to £1,350 per month, considering the lack of white goods and basic heating. The increase was also deferred due to the tenant's hardship.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant may request a reduction in rent if the proposed increase would cause undue hardship.

Topics

rent adjustmentundue hardship

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the rent based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive for letting the property in the open market. This includes considering the terms of the tenancy and any notices given under Grounds 1 to 5 of Schedule 2 to the Act.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal adjusted the proposed rent after considering the property's condition and the lack of certain amenities.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal adjusted the rent from £1,500 to £1,350 per month, taking into account the lack of white goods and a basic heating system, and deferred the effective date of the increase due to the tenant's hardship.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00AD/MNR/2025/0686

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 22 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Mr [RESPONDENT]

Landlord Mr [RESPONDENT] 6 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £ 1350 Per Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 15 July 2025

*3. The amount included for services is not applicable

Per

*4. Service charges are not included

5. Date assured tenancy commenced 31 January 2022

6. Length of the term or rental period Monthly Assured Periodic Tenancy

7. Allocation of liability for repairs In accordance with agreement

8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None

9. Description of premises A purpose built first floor flat built in 1985 forming part of a three storey block. Accommodation comprises: two bedrooms, kitchen, living room, bathroom/WC..

[NAME] of Decision 15 July 2025

1

Case Reference

: LON/00AD/MNR/2025/0686

Property : 22, [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant

: [COUNSEL]

Landlord : [COUNSEL] : None

Date of Objection : 5 February 2025

Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988

Tribunal

: Mr [NAME] of Summary Reasons : 15 July 2025

_______________________________________________

DECISION

The Tribunal determines a rent of £1,350 per calendar month with effect from 15 July 2025. ____________________________________ FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

2

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023

SUMMARY REASONS

Background

1. The Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 dated 29 January 2025 which proposed a new rent of £1,500 per month in place of the existing rent of £1,040 per month to take effect from 1 March 2025.

2. On the 5 February 2025 under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent.

3. The parties did not request a hearing or an inspection to determine this matter and the Tribunal agreed with this arrangement. Therefore, this case was considered on the basis of the papers provided by the parties with the assistance of Rightmove and Google Maps.

Evidence

4. The Tribunal has received completed statements from the parties together with a floor plan and schedules of comparable evidence from each.

Determination and Valuation

5. Having consideration of the comparable evidence provided by the parties and our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the Belvedere area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in good lettable condition with modern fittings and services would be £1,500 per month.

6. The Tribunal has considered carefully the party’s submissions and using its own expertise, we consider a deduction of £150 per month should be applied to take into account no white goods provided by the Landlord and no heating system other than basic electric heaters which have recently been upgraded. This reduces the rental figure to £1,350 per month. It should be noted that this figure cannot be a simple arithmetical calculation and is not based on capital costs but is the Tribunal’s estimate of the amount by which the rent would need to be reduced to attract a tenant.

Decision

8. The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a [NAME] under an assured tenancy in its current condition was £1,350 per calendar month.

3 9. In her evidence the tenant made an application to the Tribunal under s14(7) This provision allows the Tribunal to defer the date of increase to the date of determination if it appeared to the Tribunal that it would cause hardship to the tenant. The tenant confirmed the increase in rent proposed by the Landlord was due to take effect on 1st March 2025 would cause undue hardship. The Tenant is currently on maternity leave and awaiting to go back to work with no fixed date due to childcare issues. It is stated it has been proposed the Tenant return to work on a part time basis instead of full time due to childcare issues which will result in an extra financial strain.

10. The Tribunal has considered this request and on the balance of the evidence provided, the conclusion of the Tribunal is that there is sufficient substantiation to show such undue hardship and accordingly the start date for the rent increase is deferred to the date of this decision.

11. The Tribunal directs the new rent of £1,350 per month to take effect on the 15 July 2025. This being the date of the Tribunal’s decision.

Chairman: [NAME]: 15 July 2025

APPEAL PROVISIONS

These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant requested a reduction due to the proposed increase causing undue hardship.
  • The tenant is entitled to a rent reduction based on improvements made to the property.
  • The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent determination based on the condition and location of the property.
  • The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent adjusted for the condition of the property.
  • The tenant is entitled to a rent adjustment based on the property's condition and market comparables.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The rent was adjusted from £1,500 to £1,350 per month and the increase was deferred due to the tenant's hardship.

Who was involved?

The tenant requested a rent adjustment due to hardship, and the landlord proposed an increase.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided to adjust the rent and defer the increase because the tenant faced undue hardship.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 section 14 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that the proposed rent increase would cause undue hardship to the tenant was crucial.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone facing undue hardship due to a rent increase can seek a rent adjustment.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Statements from both parties, a floor plan, and comparable evidence were important.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions from the First-tier Tribunal can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to consult a solicitor for legal advice on rent adjustments.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.