Market Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
📌 In brief
The Tribunal decided on a new monthly rent of £1,897.50 for an assured periodic tenancy, effective from June 2nd, 2025, based on evidence of comparable properties and local rental values.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a fair market rent for their assured periodic tenancy, adjusted for specific property conditions.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant with an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their tenancy. The tribunal will then determine a fair market rent for the property, considering the terms of the existing tenancy and disregarding certain factors such as improvements made by the tenant or reductions due to non-compliance with tenancy terms.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined a new rent for an assured periodic tenancy based on comparable evidence and local rental values.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal determined a new rent of £1,897.50 per month for an assured periodic tenancy, effective from June 2nd, 2025, after considering comparable evidence and local rental values.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. JD/LON/00AT/MNR/2025/0819
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 4 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
[NAME] Valuer
Landlord [RESPONDENT] [NAME] & [RESPONDENT] [ADDRESS], Staines upon Thames, [POSTCODE]
Tenant Mr [APPELLANT] [NAME] and Ms [APPELLANT]
1. The rent is: £
1897.50
Per Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 15 June 2025
*3. The amount included for services is/is
negligible/not applicable Nil Per Month
5. Date assured tenancy commenced 15 June 2020
6. Length of the term or rental period Monthly
7. Allocation of liability for repairs In accordance with Tenancy Agreement terms
8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None
9. Description of premises A two storey semi detached house with garden and garage. It offers a kitchen, living room, downstairs WC, 3 bedrooms and bathroom WC. It is situated in an established residential area.
[NAME] of Decision 15 September 2025
1
Case Reference
: JD/LON/00AT/MNR/2025/0819
Property : 4 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Tenant
: [APPELLANT] [NAME] and [APPELLANT]
Landlord : [RESPONDENT] [NAME] and [RESPONDENT] [NAME] of Objection : 20 May 2025
Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988
Tribunal
: [NAME] Valuer
Date of Summary Reasons
: 15 September 2025
_______________________________________________
DECISION
The Tribunal determines a rent of £1,897.50 per calendar month with effect from 2 June 2025. ____________________________________
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023 FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
2
SUMMARY REASONS
Background 1. On 25 April 2025 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £2,300 in place of the existing rent of £1,700 per month to take effect from 2 June 2025.
2. The Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent.
Inspection 3. The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties.
Evidence 4. The Tribunal has consideration of the written submissions provided by the Tenant including the rental valuation from Blue Estae Agents. The Landlord made no written submissions to Tribunal following the S13 application.
5. Statute requires any new rent to take effect at the beginning of a new period of the tenancy and guidance is given by the Court of Appeal authority Church Commissioners for England v Meya [2006] 2 EGLR 39 on what constitutes the period of the tenancy. A more recent Upper Tribunal authority [COMPANY] v Lupo [2024] UKUT 316 (LC) addressed the issue of period of tenancy.
The guidance offered by statute in conjunction with these authorities is that a valid Notice of Increase must show the start date for the new rent as either:
a. the start date of the new period of the tenancy; or b. the date that the rent is payable.
For this S13 application (b) is adopted.
Determination and Valuation 6. Having consideration of the comparable evidence proved by the parties and of our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in its would be in the region of £2,300 per calendar month. This accord with the opinion of the Landlord. From this level of rent we have made adjustments to reflect any tenant improvements, tenant furniture and floor coverings, dilapidation and obsolescence at the property.
7. The full valuation is shown below:
3
Decision 8. The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy was £1,897.50 per calendar month.
9. The Tribunal directed the new rent of £1,897.50 to take effect on 2 June 2025. The Tribunal was satisfied that a starting date of that specified in the Landlord’s notice.
Chairman: [NAME]: 12 September 2025
APPEAL PROVISIONS
You can only appeal if the First-tier Tribunal decision was wrong on one or more points of law and you must say why the First-tier Tribunal was wrong in law. These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision.
If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons.
4 Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Market Rent Determination for Split-Level Flat in London
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Tenant
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent adjusted for the condition of the property.
- The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent adjusted for the condition and amenities of the property.
- The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent based on the condition and location of the property.
- The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent for an assured periodic tenancy, adjusted for the property's condition.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal decided on a new monthly rent of £1,897.50 for an assured periodic tenancy, effective from June 2nd, 2025.
Who was involved?
The decision involved a tenant and a landlord in a dispute over the rent for an assured periodic tenancy.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on evidence of comparable properties and local rental values, adjusting for specific property conditions.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988, specifically section 14, was applied to determine the market rent.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the evidence of comparable properties and local rental values.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant, setting a lower rent than initially proposed by the landlord.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation may benefit from presenting evidence of comparable rental prices in their area.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Written submissions and rental valuations from both parties were important in making the decision.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed if there are grounds to argue that the First-tier Tribunal was wrong on a point of law.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving legal disputes over rent.
