VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on a new rent for an assured periodic tenancy, setting the rent at £1440 per month. They took into account the current market conditions and the state of the property.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair market rent for their assured periodic tenancy, adjusted for the condition of the property.

Topics

tenancy disputesrent determination

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant with an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their tenancy. The tribunal will then determine a fair market rent for the property, taking into account the current market conditions and the state of the property. The new rent should reflect what a willing landlord would charge for a similar property under an assured periodic tenancy.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined a new rent for an assured periodic tenancy after considering the current market conditions and the state of the property.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined a new rent of £1440 per month for an assured periodic tenancy, effective from November 13, 2023, after considering the market value and the state of the property.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. JM/LON/00AZ/MNR/2023/0213

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 2 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Mr A [NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT]

Landlord [RESPONDENT], 100 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME]

1. The rent is: £ 1440 Per month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 13 November 2023

*3. The amount included for services is/is

negligible/not applicable

Per

*4. Service charges are variable and are not included

5. Date assured tenancy commenced 23 July 2020

6. Length of the term or rental period monthly

7. Allocation of liability for repairs S11 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985

8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord Carpets curtains and white goods

9. Description of premises Ground floor 2 bedroom purpose built flat

Chairman A Harris Date of Decision 13 November 2023

1

Case Reference

: JM/LON/00AZ/MNR/2023/0213

Property : 2 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant

: [APPELLANT]

Landlord : [RESPONDENT] of Objection : 20 April 2023

Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988

Tribunal

: Mr [NAME] [NAME]

Mr [NAME] of Summary Reasons

: 13 November 2023

_______________________________________________

DECISION

The Tribunal determines a rent of £1440.00 per calendar month with effect from 13 November 2023. ____________________________________

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023

FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

2

SUMMARY REASONS

Background

1. On 6 March 2023 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £ 1600.00 in place of the existing rent of £ 1300.00 per month to take effect from 23 April 2023.

2. On 20 April 2023 under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent. The Tenant’s referral was received by the Tribunal on 20 April 2023.

Inspection

3. The Tribunal has carried out an inspection of the property on 13 November 2023.

Evidence

4. The Tribunal has consideration of the written submissions provided by the Tenant and the Landlord. In particular the survey report supplied by the Tenant, written representations about repair and the history of litigation and confirmation from the Landlord of agreement to carry out works which have not yet been completed. The Tribunal saw the disrepair and has reflected it in its valuation.

Determination and Valuation

5. Having consideration of our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in the condition and with the amenities the market would expect would be in the region of £1600.00 per calendar month. From this level of rent we have made adjustments in relation to:

a. The disrepair recorded in the evidence and seen on the inspection.

6. The full valuation is shown below:

7. The Tribunal determines a rent of £1440 per calendar month.

PCM AST Market rent 1,600.00 £ less condition/terms 10.0% 160.00 -£ 1,440.00 £

3

Decision

8. The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy was £1440.00 per calendar month.

9. The Tribunal directed the new rent of £1440.00 to take effect on 13 November 2023 The Tribunal was satisfied that a starting date of that specified in the Landlord’s notice would cause the tenant undue hardship.

Chairman: A Harris

Date: 13 November 2023

APPEAL PROVISIONS

These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent for their assured periodic tenancy.
  • The rent is adjusted for the condition of the property.
  • The rent is adjusted for the condition and amenities of the property.
  • The rent is set at the open market rate as determined by a tribunal under Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal set a new rent of £1440 per month for an assured periodic tenancy.

Who was involved?

The decision involved a tenant and a landlord.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court considered the current market conditions and the state of the property to determine the new rent.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 section 14 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the current market value of the property and its condition.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation may also seek a determination of a fair market rent for their assured periodic tenancy.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The survey report and written representations about repair and the history of litigation were important.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed according to the appeal provisions detailed in the judgment.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is always recommended to get advice from a qualified solicitor for a case like this.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.