VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) decided on a new rent for an assured periodic tenancy. They set the rent at £2,200 per month, effective from July 7th, 2025, after considering the property's condition and local rental values.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair market rent for their assured periodic tenancy, taking into account the condition of the property.

Topics

tenancy disputesrent determination

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant with an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their tenancy. The tribunal will then determine a fair market rent for the property, considering the condition of the property and local rental values. The new rent would be set for a periodic tenancy with the same periods as the original tenancy.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined a new rent for an assured periodic tenancy based on the property's condition and local rental values.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined a new rent of £2,200 per month for an assured periodic tenancy, effective from 7 July 2025, after considering the property's condition and local rental values.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00AC/MNR/2025/0873

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 34 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT] JP

Landlord Mr [RESPONDENT] 36 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant Mr [APPELLANT] [NAME] [APPELLANT] [NAME]

1. The rent is: £ 2,200 Per Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 7 July 2025

*3. The amount included for services is not applicable

Per

*4. Service charges are not included

5. Date assured tenancy commenced 7 November 2021

6. Length of the term or rental period Monthly Assured Periodic Tenancy

7. Allocation of liability for repairs In accordance with agreement

8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None

9. Description of premises An end of terrace 1930’s-built house with parking on the frontage and a rear garden. Accommodation comprises: 3 bedrooms, bathroom, living room, kitchen/breakfast room,

[NAME] of Decision 8 December 2025

1

Case Reference

: LON/00AC/MNR/2025/0873

Property : 34 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant

: Mr [APPELLANT] [NAME] [COUNSEL] [NAME]

Landlord : Mr [COUNSEL] : None

Date of Objection : 3 July 2025

Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988

Tribunal

: Mr [NAME] Mr [NAME] JP

Date of Summary Reasons : 8 December 2025

_______________________________________________

DECISION

The Tribunal determines a rent of £2,200 per calendar month with effect from 7 July 2025. ____________________________________ FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

2

SUMMARY REASONS

Background

1. The Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 with dated 14 May 2025 which proposed a new rent of £2,300 per calendar month in place of the existing rent of £1,650 per calendar month to take effect from 7 July 2025. This being an increase of £650 per calendar month

2. On 3 July 2025 under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenants referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent.

3.On 20 August 2025, the Tribunal prepared Directions for the conduct of the case.

4. The parties did not request a hearing to determine this matter and the Tribunal agreed with this arrangement. Therefore, this case was considered on the basis of an inspection, the papers provided by the parties with the assistance of Rightmove and Google Maps.

5. This case was originally set down to be determined on 29 October 2025. However, the inspection was cancelled due the tenant’s son recovering from illness.

The Inspection

5. A rearranged inspection of the property was undertaken by the Tribunal on 8 December 2025 in the presence of the tenant.

Evidence

5. The Tribunal has received a completed statement from the landlord and a signed reply form from the tenants, which was not completed. The parties did not provide any evidence in connection with comparable rental evidence in the area.

Determination and Valuation

6. Having consideration of the evidence provided by the parties and our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the Cockfosters area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in good lettable condition with modern fittings and services would be £2,500 per calendar month.

7. The Tribunal did not received submissions from the tenant regarding the condition of the property, using its own expertise, we consider a deduction of

3 £300 per month should be applied to take into account the mould to the internal walls, dated kitchen fittings and reduced garden size and defective shower unit. This reduces the rental figure to £2,200 per calendar month. It should be noted that this figure cannot be a simple arithmetical calculation and is not based on capital costs but is the Tribunal’s estimate of the amount by which the rent would need to be reduced to attract a tenant.

Decision

8. The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy in its current condition was £2,200 per calendar month.

9. The Tribunal directs the new rent of £2,200 per month to take effect on 7 July 2025. This being the date in the Landlord’s notice.

Chairman: [NAME]: 8 December 2025

APPEAL PROVISIONS

These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The rent is adjusted based on the current market rates.
  • The rent reflects the specific condition of the property.
  • Rent adjustments consider comparable rental evidence.
  • Rent reductions are granted based on the property's condition.
  • Improvements made by the tenant can lead to a fair market rent assessment.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal set a new rent of £2,200 per month for an assured periodic tenancy.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the property's condition and local rental values.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 section 14 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The condition of the property and local rental values were the most important factors.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should consider the condition of their property and local rental values when disputing rent.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Completed statements from both parties and an inspection of the property were important.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed according to the appeal provisions outlined in the judgment.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.