First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent at £950 for Assured Tenancy
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal decided on a fair market rent of £950 per month for an assured periodic tenancy, considering factors like the property's condition and specifications. This decision took effect from 1 October 2024.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a fair market rent for their assured periodic tenancy, taking into account the condition and specifications of the property.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant with an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine a fair market rent based on what a willing landlord would charge for a similar property in the open market. The determination takes into account the condition and specifications of the property.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined a rent of £950 per month for a periodic assured tenancy, effective from 1 October 2024.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal determined a fair market rent of £950 per month for an assured periodic tenancy, considering the property's condition and specifications. The decision took effect from 1 October 2024.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. HAV/00HP/MNR/2024/0605
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
[NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT] [RESPONDENT]
Landlord Mr [RESPONDENT] c/o [NAME], [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Tenant Mr [APPELLANT] [NAME]
1. The rent is: £ 950.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 1 October 2024
3. The amount included for services is not applicable n/a Per n/a
4. Date assured tenancy commenced 1 March 2004
5. Length of the term or rental period Periodic
6. Allocation of liability for repairs Landlord
7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None
8. Description of premises First floor, two bedroom, one living room, kitchen, one bathroom, and a garage.
[NAME] of Decision 26 November 2024
1
Case Reference
: HAV/00HP/MNR/2024/0605
Property : [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Tenant
: [APPELLANT]
Landlord : [APPELLANT] of Objection : 24 September 2024
Type of [NAME] : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988
Tribunal
: Mr [NAME] (Hons) MA
LLM FRICS Mr [NAME] of Summary Reasons
: 26 November 2024
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2024
_______________________________________________
DECISION
The Tribunal determines a rent of £950.00 per month with effect from 1 October 2024. ____________________________________
FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
2
SUMMARY REASONS
Background
1. On 5 August 2024 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £1150.00 per month in place of the existing rent of £950.00 per month to take effect from 1 October 2024.
2. On 24 September 2024 under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent. The Tenant’s referral was received by the Tribunal on 24 September 2024.
Inspection 3. The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties.
Evidence 4. The Tribunal has considered the written submissions provided by the Tenant and the Landlord. The [NAME] from the Tenant stated the property is a first floor flat providing one living room, two bedrooms, bathroom, kitchen and garage. The Tenants Reply Form noted that there was no central heating and that the tenant had supplied curtains and carpets. The Tenant also noted that the landlord had replaced the shower in 2017, boiler in 2019 and new wiring in 2019. The Tenant submitted some comparables and proposed a figure of £935.00 per month.
5. The Landlord in their Reply Form, noted four comparables in the block with carparking ranging from £1100.00 pm to £1210.00 per month.
Determination and Valuation 6. Having considered the comparable evidence provided by the parties and our own expert general knowledge of rental values in the area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in good lettable condition would be in the region of £1250.00 per calendar month.
7. However, there are a number of aspects which differ or detract from a modern letting with a property in good contemporary condition.
Deductions
Lack of central heating £100.00 [COMPANY] white goods £100.00 Tenants provision of carpets £30.00 Tenants provision of curtains £15.00 Damaged plaster and poor decoration £55.00
3 ----------
£300.00 per month
8. The Tribunal determines a rent of £1250.00 per month less £300.00 per month giving £950.00 per calendar month.
Decision 9. The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy was £950.00 per month.
10. The Tribunal directs the new rent of £950.00 per month to take effect on 1 October 2024, this being the date as set out in the Landlord’s Notice of Increase.
APPEAL PROVISIONS
These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any request for full reasons should be made within a month. Any subsequent [NAME] for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.
1
Case Reference
: HAV/00HP/MNR/2024/0605
Property : [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Tenant
: [APPELLANT]
Landlord : [APPELLANT] of Objection : 24 September 2024
Tribunal
: Mr [NAME] (Hons) MA
LLM FRICS Mr [NAME] of Summary Reasons
: 26 November 2024
Date of Full Reasons : 23 January 2025
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2025
_______________________________________________
DECISION
The Tribunal determines a rent of £950.00 per month with effect from 1 October 2024. FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
2 ____________________________________
Full REASONS
The Landlord, [RESPONDENT] submitted an [NAME] for Permission to Appeal a decision to the Upper Tribunal ([NAME]) dated 18 January 2024. Such an [NAME] is premature given the full reasons for the decision have not been requested or issued. [NAME] has determined that the [NAME] will be treated as a request for Full Reasons. If either party after the consideration of the Full Reasons wishes to appeal, the appeal provisions are recorded at the end of this decision.
Background
3. Directions were issued to the parties on 15 October 2024 requiring the Landlord to submit their statement of case by 29 October 2024 and the Tenant by 12 November 2024. The Directions also included a blank Reply Form for the parties use.
Inspection
4. The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties.
Evidence
5. The Tribunal has considered the written submissions provided by the Tenant and the Landlord.
Applicant Tenant’s Submission
6. The Applicant Tenant completed a Reply Form dated 12 November 2024. The Form confirmed the tenancy is for a flat comprising two bedrooms, one
3 living room and a kitchen, bathroom with WC, a garage and access to communal gardens.
7. The Form notes there is Electric central heating, double glazing.
8. The Tenant noted that the Landlord had submitted a new shower in 2017, a new boiler in 2019 and new wiring in 2019. The Tenant notes there is no service charge.
9. The Reply Form detailed the defects in the property, the tribunal has considered these in detail but in summary they are;
Living room – condensation within the double-glazing carpets pre-2007.
Bathroom – dated suite and carpet, damaged ceiling from previous leak
Kitchen – not built in and dated
Master bedroom – cracking in plaster
Second bedroom – cracking in plaster
The heating in the flat is provided by a single storage heater in the hallway.
The Tenant noted in the Reply Form that the carpets were provided by the landlord, the curtains by the tenant and the double glazing supplied by the [NAME]. Also confirmed there were no white goods supplied by the landlord.
The Tenant also noted in the Reply Form that they were aware of similar flats within a three-mile radius which rent between £900 and £970 per month.
The Tenant also supplied several photos of the inside of the property which the tribunal has considered.
The Tenant submitted some comparables and proposed a figure of £935 per month.
Respondent Landlord’s submission
10. The Landlord completed and submitted their Reply Form on 21 October 2024. The Reply Form confirmed the property to be a first-floor flat comprising; two bedrooms, one living room, a kitchen, bathroom / WC. The tenancy has the benefit of garage and access to communal gardens. The Landlord's agent also noted “rent includes all works relating to the communal areas such as lighting, cleaning and gardening, and the property is located within a “five-minute drive to the train station and 5 minutes to bus stops.” The Landlords Reply Form is silent on who supplied the electric heating, the double glazing, carpets and curtains or the white goods.
11. The Form also notes comparables from which the Landlords agent draws comparison within the block or attached block on [ADDRESS].
4
Flat 14 agent [NAME] – two-bedroom ground floor flat with garage with a rent of £1200 per month let unfurnished.
Flat 9 agent [NAME] two-bedroom flat, first floor, parking, let unfurnished at £1200 per month unfurnished.
Flat 12 A agent Winkworth two-bedroom flat, ground floor, with parking let at £1100 per month unfurnished.
Flat 4 agent [NAME] two-bedroom flat, ground floor, with parking let at £1200 unfurnished.
Determination and Valuation
12. Having considered the comparable evidence provided by the parties and our own expert general knowledge of rental values in the area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in good lettable condition would be in the region of £1250 per calendar month.
13. The comparables cited by the Landlord were given considerable weight because they were in the same block. The comparables given by the Tenant were useful from a contextual point but were gained from further away.
14. However, there are a number of areas of condition and specification which differ or detract from a modern letting with a property in good contemporary condition.
Deductions
Lack of full central heating £100 [COMPANY] white goods £100 Carpets (poor condition) £30 Tenants provision of curtains £15 Damaged plaster and poor decoration £55 ----------
£300 per month
15. The Tribunal determines a rent of £1250 per month less £300 per month giving £950 per calendar month.
Decision
16. The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy was £950 per month.
5 17. The Tribunal directs the new rent of £950 per month to take effect on 1 October 2024, this being the date as set out in the Landlord’s Notice of Increase.
RIGHTS OF APPEAL
By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the Tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal ([NAME]), then a written [NAME] for permission must be made to the First- tier Tribunal at the regional office which has been dealing with the case. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must arrive at the regional office within 28 days after the Tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the [NAME]. If the [NAME] is not made within the 28 day time limit, such [NAME] must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the Tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the [NAME] for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party [NAME] the [NAME] is seeking. If the Tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further [NAME] for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal ([NAME]).
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Secures Reduced Rent Due to Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent at £1200 for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent based on the property's condition.
- The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent adjusted for the property's condition and amenities.
- The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent considering the condition and location of the property.
- The tenant is entitled to a fair rent based on the property's condition and market comparables.
- The tenant is entitled to a rent adjustment if the property is not in good tenantable condition.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
It decided on a fair market rent of £950 per month for an assured periodic tenancy.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court considered the property's condition and specifications, determining a fair market rent of £950 per month.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988 section 14 was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The condition and specifications of the property were the most important arguments.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should consider the condition and specifications of their property when disputing a rent increase.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Comparables and the condition of the property were important evidence.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
Yes, it is recommended to get a solicitor for a case like this.
