VadeLab
Allowed in PartFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent Considering Property Condition

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on a market rent of £800 per month for a property, taking into account the condition of the property and applying a 20% discount.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a market rent adjusted for the condition of the property.

Topics

market rent determinationproperty condition impact

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

This section allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the open-market rent based on various factors including the terms of the existing tenancy and any improvements made by the tenant.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined a discounted market rent due to property condition.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined a market rent of £800 per month for a property in good tenantable condition, applying a 20% discount for the property's condition.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed in Part

1

Case Reference

: LON/OOAP/MNR/2024/0299

Property : 5 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant

: Mr [APPELLANT]

Landlord : Ms [APPELLANT] represented by Mr [RESPONDENT] of Objection : 11 May 2024

Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988

Tribunal

: [NAME] [NAME] of Summary Reasons

: 1 November 2024

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2024

_______________________________________________

DECISION

The Tribunal determines a rent of £800.00 per calendar month with effect from 1 June 2024. ____________________________________

FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

2

SUMMARY REASONS

Background 1. On 2 April 2024 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £1100.00 per month in place of the existing rent of £ 550.00 per month to take effect from 1 June 2024.

2. An application dated 11 May 2024 was made under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent. The Tenant’s referral was received by the Tribunal on 11 May 2024.

Inspection 3. The Tribunal did inspect the property. The property is located in mews behind the main road. The tenancy is of a room and ensuite at the top of the mid terrace mews house. At the time of the inspection, it was noted that on the ground floor of the building was one tenant with an adjoining room and adjoining bathroom. It is understood that the ground floor bathroom is available for use by the Applicant. On the first floor is a kitchen and a further room which was at the time if the inspection set out as a living room, it was understood that this was used in conjunction with the tenancy of the ground floor. The kitchen is functional, small and in modest condition. The common parts of the building appear tired. On the second floor, was the subject premises which comprised a room capable of being used as a double bedroom, it contained a single bed that was understood to be owned by the tenant and a fridge freezer which was supplied by the landlord. Off the bedroom was an ensuite shower room for the sole use of the tenant, the room comprised a shower, WC and a basin. The ensuite had a sky light. The ceiling was showing extensive evidence of flaking paint, it is not clear if this was as a result of the humidity in the room or leaking from the roof. The bedroom and ensuite had radiators supplying heat from a central boiler heating system for the building. All bills, council tax, water, electricity and gas are contained in the rent paid.

Evidence 4. The Tribunal has considered the written submissions, oral submissions made at the hearing, provided by the parties, and the tribunal has had the benefit of an inspection. The Landlord [COUNSEL] gave evidence and was represented by Mr [COUNSEL] a solicitor. Mr [COUNSEL] gave evidence as applicant. Both parties set out the history and provided their view of the rental value of the property. The tenant submitting it was worth in the region of £650-£700 per month including bills. The Landlord asserting their belief it was worth in the region of £1100.00 per month.

Determination and Valuation 5. Having consideration of the comparable evidence proved by the parties and of our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in good tenantable condition would

3 be in the region of £1000 per calendar month including bills which are electricity , gas, water and council tax.

Decision 6. The Tribunal considered what discount was applicable for the condition of both the room and the wider property. The discount determined was 20% the tribunal therefore determined a rent of £800.00 per month.

7. The Tenant made an application for the effective date of the rent to be later than that contained in the Notice of the rent Increase by the Landlord. The Tenant noted in their submission that they had long term health issues which prevented them from working. The tribunal heard evidence that whilst the tenant was on long term sick leave the company was trying to accommodate the tenants needs while remaining in employment.

Given this evidence the tribunal did not make an adjustment for the hardship aspect of the application.

8. The Tribunal therefore determines the new rent of £800.00 per month to take effect on 1 June 2024.

Chairman: R Waterhouse FRICS

Date: 1 November 2024

APPEAL PROVISIONS

These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any request for full reasons should be made within a month. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.

MR22

HS/LON/00AP/MNR/2024/0299

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 5 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

R [NAME]

Landlord [APPELLANT] 6 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant [NAME]

1. The rent is: £ 800.00 Per month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 1 June 2024

*3. The amount included for services is/is

negligible/not applicable n/a Per

*4. Service charges are variable and are not included

5. Date assured tenancy commenced 1 April 2021

6. Length of the term or rental period 12 Months

7. Allocation of liability for repairs landlord

8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord Wardrobe and fridge freezer

9. Description of premises One room with ensuite in shared house

Chairman R Waterhouse FRICS Date of Decision 1 November 2024

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent based on the condition of the property.
  • The tenant is entitled to a rent adjustment if the property has significant insulation and ventilation issues.
  • The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent for their assured periodic tenancy, taking into account the condition and specifications of the property.
  • A tenant is entitled to a fair market rent adjusted for the condition of the property.
  • Improvements made by the tenant to the property can lead to a fair market rent assessment.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal set a market rent of £800 per month for the property.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided to apply a 20% discount to the market rent due to the property's condition.

Which laws or rules were applied?

Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that the property's condition warranted a discount on the market rent was crucial.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was partially in favour of the tenant, as the rent was reduced.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation may also have their rent adjusted based on the condition of the property.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The condition of the property and the comparable rental values in the area were important.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed if the party disagrees with the outcome.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.