Tribunal Sets Fair Market Rent for Tenancy Dispute
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal decided on a fair market rent for a tenancy dispute, considering the condition of the property and similar rental prices in the area. The rent was set at £1,900 per month.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a fair market rent adjusted for the condition of the property.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine a fair market rent based on what a willing landlord would charge for a similar property in the open market. The determination considers the property's condition and comparable rental prices in the area.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined a fair market rent considering the property's condition and comparable rents in the area.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined a fair market rent of £1,900 per month for a tenancy, taking into account the property's condition and comparable rental prices in the area.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00BG/MNR/2025/0830
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
[NAME]
Landlord Ms [RESPONDENT] c/o [RESPONDENT] [ADDRESS], Manchester [POSTCODE]
Tenant [APPELLANT] [NAME] c/o [NAME]
1. The rent is: £ 1,900 Per Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 1 July 2025
*3. The amount included for services is not applicable
Per
*4. Service charges are not included
5. Date assured tenancy commenced 1 November 2022
6. Length of the term or rental period Monthly Assured Periodic Tenancy
7. Allocation of liability for repairs In accordance with agreement
8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None
9. Description of premises A converted second floor flat forming part of a mid terrace Victorian building, accommodation comprises one bedroom, living room, kitchen, bathroom,
[NAME] of Decision 10 November 2025
1
Case Reference
: LON/00AW/MNR/2025/0869
Property : [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Tenant
: [COUNSEL] [NAME] : [NAME]
Landlord : Ms [COUNSEL] : [COUNSEL] LLP
Date of Objection : 18 June 2025
Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988
Tribunal
: Mr [NAME] of Summary Reasons : 10 November 2025
_______________________________________________
DECISION
The Tribunal determines a rent of £1,900 per calendar month with effect from 1 July 2025. ____________________________________ FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
2
SUMMARY REASONS
Background
1. The Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 dated 21 May 2025 which proposed a new rent of £2,250 per month in place of the existing rent of £1,700 per month to take effect from 1 July 2025. This being an increase of £400 per month
2. On the 18 June 2025 under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent.
3.On the 17 September 2025, the Tribunal prepared Directions for the conduct of the case.
4. The parties did not request a hearing or an inspection to determine this matter and the Tribunal agreed with this arrangement. Therefore, this case was considered on the basis of the papers provided by the parties with the assistance of Rightmove and Google Maps.
Evidence
5. The Tribunal has received completed witness statements from both the Tenant and the Landlord which included helpful photographs together with various reports and a letter from [NAME] dated 6 October 2025. The parties also provided evidence in connection with comparable rentals in the area.
Determination and Valuation
6. Having consideration of the evidence provided by the parties and our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the [ADDRESS] area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in good lettable condition with modern fittings and services would be £2,300 per month.
7. The Tribunal received substantial submissions from the parties regarding the condition of the property, using its own expertise and this evidence, we consider a deduction of £400 per month should be applied to take into account the penetrating damp and mould, the basic secondary glazed windows on a very noisy road, the second floor location without a lift, cracking to wall and ceiling plaster and dated kitchen fittings This reduces the rental figure to £1,900 per month. It should be noted that this figure cannot be a simple arithmetical calculation and is not based on capital costs but is the Tribunal’s estimate of the amount by which the rent would need to be reduced to attract a tenant.
3 Decision
8. The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy in its current condition was £1,900 per calendar month.
9. The Tribunal directs the new rent of £1,900 per month to take effect on the 1 July 2025. This being the date in the Landlord’s notice.
Chairman: [NAME]: 1o November 2025
APPEAL PROVISIONS
These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Market Rent Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Adjustment Based on Property Condition - First-tier Tribunal Decision
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Property in Poor Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Rent After Considering Tenant Improvements
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Due to Property Disrepair
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent adjusted for the condition of the property.
- The rent should be adjusted based on the property's condition and local rental values.
- Improvements made by the tenant to the property can lead to a rent reduction.
- A fair market rent assessment takes into account comparable properties and recent improvements.
- Rent adjustments must reflect the disrepair and poor condition of the property.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
It decided on a fair market rent of £1,900 per month for the tenancy.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved in the dispute.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court considered the property's condition and comparable rental prices in the area to determine the fair market rent.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988 section 14 was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The condition of the property, including issues like damp and mould, was a significant factor in determining the rent.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was in favour of the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should consider the condition of their property and comparable rental prices when disputing a rent increase.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Witness statements, photographs, and reports on comparable rental prices were important.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, decisions like this can be appealed through the appropriate legal channels.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is highly recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.
