Rent Adjustment Based on Property Condition - First-tier Tribunal Decision
📌 In brief
The Tribunal adjusted the proposed rent for a property based on its condition. They set the rent at £1615 per month, effective from May 24, 2025, after considering the property's maintenance and market comparables.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a fair market rent adjusted for the condition of the property.
📖 What the law says
This section applies to certain types of assured periodic tenancies, allowing landlords to serve a notice proposing a new rent to take effect at the beginning of a new period of the tenancy. The new rent can only take effect if the period begins at least two months after the notice is served. Additionally, if the rent has been previously increased, the new rent period is determined differently depending on the type of tenancy.
A tenant under an assured tenancy can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy, provided that the rent is not pursuant to a previous determination under this section and more than six months have not elapsed since the beginning of the tenancy. The tribunal then determines the rent at which the dwelling house might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord under similar conditions.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal adjusted the proposed rent due to the property's condition.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal reviewed a notice proposing a new rent and adjusted it based on the property's condition. The final rent was set at £1615 per month, effective from May 24, 2025, after considering the property's maintenance and market comparables.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
(c)
1
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : LON/00AR/MNR/2025/0638 Property : 4 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Tenant : Ms [APPELLANT] [NAME] Landlord : Ms [APPELLANT] of Application : Section 13 Housing Act 1988 Tribunal Members : Judge [NAME] Ms A Flynn MA MRICS Date Consideration : 2 May 2025 Date of Summary Reasons : 2 May 2025
_______________________________________________
DECISION
The Tribunal determines a rent of £1615 per calendar month with effect from 24 May 2025 ____________________________________
SUMMARY REASONS
Background 1. On 20th November the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £1900 in place of the existing rent of £ 1200 per month to take effect from 24 December 2024.
2. On 18 December 2024 under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent. The application was received on the date it was sent.
(c)
2
Inspection 3. The Tribunal has carried out an inspection of the property on 2 May 2025. The Applicant was present at the inspection, but the Respondent was not.
Evidence 4. The Tribunal has considered the written evidence provided by the Tenant and the Landlord and in particular the photographs of the property supplied by the Applicant and the evidence of other 3-bedroom properties on the market for rent in the vicinity of the subject property supplied by the landlord and a valuation from a letting agent in respect of the property.
5. The property is link semi-detached with a garage. It is very well maintained by the tenant, who has resided there since 2007 but is showing signs of age. The kitchen appears to have been installed approximately 30 years ago and does not have a mixer tap or extractor fan. The bathroom appears to be similarly aged and also does not have a mixer tap in either the sink or bath. The property has been fitted with double glazed uPVC windows which do not have trickle vents and the areas around the windows are affected by mould. This is shown on photographs supplied by the tenant but was not present to a significant degree at the time of inspection; the tenant advised that she regularly cleans it off. Further the glazed units in the upstairs windows have failed and condensation is present between the glazing in all bedrooms. The third bedroom is extremely small.
Determination and Valuation 6. Having consideration of the comparable evidence proved by the parties and of our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in good tenantable condition would be in the region of £1900 per calendar month. From this level of rent we have made adjustments in relation to the condition of the property.
7. The full valuation is shown below:
Market Rent
£1900 per month
Less
Failed uPVC double glazed windows in upstairs rooms Dated kitchen and bathroom fittings
- £285 (-15%)
£1615
7. The Tribunal determines a rent of £1615 per calendar month
Decision
(c)
3 8. The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy was £1615 per calendar month.
9. The Tribunal directs the new rent of £1615 to take effect on 24 May 2025. The Tribunal was satisfied that a starting date of that specified in the Landlord’s notice would cause the tenant undue hardship because she relies on state benefits to pay the rent and lives with a disabled adult son. She has a monthly income of £2,720.20 according to the information she has filed regarding her income and expenditure.
Chair: [NAME]: 2 May 2025
APPEAL PROVISIONS
These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any request for full reasons should be made within a month. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00AR/MNR/2025/0638
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination or Section 22 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 4 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Judge [NAME] Ms A Flynn MA MRICS
Landlord [NAME] 4 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Tenant Ms [APPELLANT] [NAME]
1. The rent is: £ 1615 Per month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 24 May 2025
*3. The amount included for services is/is
negligible/not applicable n/a Per
*4. Service charges are variable and are not included
5. Date assured tenancy commenced 24 March 2023 (12 months)
6. Length of the term or rental period Statutory monthly Periodic
7. Allocation of liability for repairs s.11 Landlord and Tenant Act
8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord Oven fridge washing amchine
9. Description of premises 3 bedroom semi-detached house with garage and garden
[NAME] of Decision 2 May 2025
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Market Rent Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Property in Poor Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Market Rent of £1,800 for Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Secures Lower Rent After Tribunal Considers Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Adjustment for Assured Tenancy: Factors Considered
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Market Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Property in Totnes
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Due to Health and Safety Issues
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy - First-tier Tribunal Decis…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Due to Health and Safety Issues
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent of £2,200 Per Month
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The property's kitchen and bathroom fittings were old, leading to a rent reduction.
- The upstairs windows had failed double glazing with condensation, which reduced the rent.
- The tenant's reliance on state benefits and living with a disabled adult son caused undue hardship.
- The Tribunal considered an open market rent of £1900 per month for a property in good condition.
- The tenant regularly cleaned mould around the windows, so it was not significantly present during inspection.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal adjusted the proposed rent for a property based on its condition, setting it at £1615 per month.
Who was involved?
The tenant and landlord were involved in the case.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the property's condition, adjusting the proposed rent accordingly.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988 sections 13 and 14 were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The condition of the property was the central argument, leading to the rent adjustment.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant, who brought the case.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation may also seek rent adjustments based on their property's condition.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Photographs of the property and evidence of comparable rents in the area mattered.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, decisions like this can be appealed, but a request for full reasons must be made first.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to get advice from a qualified solicitor for cases like this.
