Rent Reduced Due to Property's Insulation Issues
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal reduced the proposed rent from £2300.00 to £2200.00 per month because of significant insulation and ventilation issues in the property, which led to condensation problems.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a rent adjustment if the property has significant insulation and ventilation issues.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant with an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine a fair rent based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive for letting the property in the open market. This includes considering the terms of the existing tenancy and any improvements made by the tenant.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal adjusted the proposed rent due to issues with insulation and ventilation causing condensation.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal determined a new rent of £2200.00 per month, effective from 1 December 2024, after considering issues with insulation and ventilation causing condensation in the property.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. FR/LON/OOBJ/MNR/2025/0600
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
R [NAME]
Landlord [RESPONDENT] [APPELLANT] 75 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Tenant [NAME] [APPELLANT] [NAME] [APPELLANT]
1. The rent is: £ 2200.00 Per month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 1 December 2024
*3. The amount included for services is/is
negligible/not applicable n/a Per
*4. Service charges are variable and are not included
5. Date assured tenancy commenced September 2021
6. Length of the term or rental period 12 months
7. Allocation of liability for repairs landlord
8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord Various in bedroom and living room
9. Description of premises 2 bedroom one living room maisonette in converted house, kitchen, bathroom double glazing and central heating
Chairman R Waterhouse Date of Decision 4 April 2025
1
Case Reference
: FR/LON/OOBJ/MNR/2025/0600
Property : Top floor flat, 75 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Tenant
: [APPELLANT] & [NAME]
Landlord : Mr [COUNSEL]
Landlord’s : Mr [COUNSEL] representative
Date of Objection : 10 November 2024
Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988
Tribunal
: R [NAME] of Full Reasons : 04 April 2025
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2025
_______________________________________________
DECISION
The Tribunal determines a rent of £2200.00 per calendar month with effect from 1 December 2024. ____________________________________ *
FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
2 Full REASONS
Background
1. On 4 October 2024 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £2300.00 per month in place of the existing rent of £1980.00 per month to take effect from 1 December 2024.
2. An application dated 10 November 2024 was made under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent. The Tenant’s referral was received by the Tribunal on 10 November 2024.
3. Directions were issued on 13 January 2025, requesting the tenant to complete a reply form by 17 February 2025 the landlord to complete their reply form by 24 February 2025.
Inspection
3. The Tribunal did inspect the property. The flat is a first and second floor flat within a converted Victorian House. The property is accessed from the road by a set of steps to the ground floor communal entrance. There is a modern front door to the actual flat and beyond is a flight of carpeted stairs which goes to the front door. On the first floor there is a modern fitted kitchen the “white goods” are the landlords. Adjacent to the kitchen is a bathroom again in good condition. The last room, on the first floor is a living room, which is good sized, some furniture is supplied by the landlord. On the second floor there are rooms one used as an office and one a large double bedroom. The Landlord supplying some furniture including the bed and the wardrobes and bedside cabinets. There is double glazing throughout the property the wiring appears new and contains USB ports. The double glazing does not have trickle vents. There is no outside space. In terms of mould there was only a very small quantity found on the ceiling during the inspection.
Evidence
Applicants' submission
4. The Applicant submitted an email dated 28 February 2025 including;
• Rent agreement and negotiation
• Mould Issue
• Photo gallery of the Property which shows the temperature at 8.5 degrees in the bathroom and mould caused by condensation.
• Market evidence for properties in 1 mile radius from the subject flat showing to let and let agreed up to £2000.00 per month.
3
5. The Respondent submitted to the tribunal a letter dated 11 March 2025 which the tribunal has considered.
Determination and Valuation
6. Having consideration of the comparable evidence proved by the parties and of our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in good tenantable condition would be in the region of £2300.00 per month excluding bills; electricity , gas, water and council tax which are liability of the tenant. The evidence submitted to the tribunal shows an insulation and ventilation issue causing a build-up of condensation. At the time of inspection this appears to be managed but from photographic evidence present in the winter months. The photographic evidence showed a reading of 8.5 degrees. The tribunal makes an adjustment of £100.00 per month to reflect this.
Decision
7. The Tribunal therefore determines the new rent of £2200.00 per month to take effect on 1 December 2024.
Chairman: R Waterhouse FRICS
Date: 4 April 2025
Appeal to the Upper Tribunal A person wishing to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Property Chamber) on a point of law must seek permission to do so by making a written application to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional Office which has been dealing with the case which application must: a. be received by the said office within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision. b. identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking. If the application is not received within the 28 –day time limit, it must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for it not complying with the 28- day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Adjusts Rent to £1450 After Considering Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Market Rent for Tenancy Dispute
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Secures Reduced Rent Due to Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Rent After Considering Tenant Improvements
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent at £950 for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Rent for Assured Tenancy
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tribunal reduced the rent because there was evidence of insulation and ventilation issues causing condensation.
- The tenant's photographic evidence showing a low temperature in the bathroom supported the need for a rent adjustment.
- The tribunal considered its own expert knowledge of rental values in the area when determining the market rent.
- The tribunal found that the condensation issue appeared to be managed at the time of inspection but was present in winter months.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal decided to reduce the proposed rent from £2300.00 to £2200.00 per month.
Who was involved?
The decision involved a tenant and a landlord.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided to adjust the rent downwards due to significant insulation and ventilation issues in the property.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988, specifically section 14, was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the evidence showing insulation and ventilation issues causing condensation in the property.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant who brought the case.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation may also be entitled to a rent adjustment if they can prove significant property issues affecting their living conditions.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Photographic evidence showing condensation issues and market evidence for comparable rents in the area mattered.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a person can appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal on a point of law within 28 days of receiving the written reasons for the decision.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is always recommended to get advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent adjustments due to property issues.
