VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided that the rent for a tenant's assured periodic tenancy should be £800 per month, based on an inspection and evidence from similar properties in the area. This decision aligns with the open market value as required by law.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to have their rent set at the open market rate as determined by a tribunal under Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988.

Topics

rent determinationtenancy agreement

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the rent based on what a willing landlord would charge in the open market for a similar tenancy.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy based on market value.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal determined that the rent for an assured periodic tenancy should be set at £800 per month, following an inspection and consideration of comparable evidence. The decision reflects the open market value as required by Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. HS/LON/00AH/MNR/2023/0322

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME] [NAME] Mrs [RESPONDENT]

Landlord [RESPONDENT] 114 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant Mr [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £ 800.00 Per month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 8 August 2023

*3. The amount included for services is/is

negligible/not applicable

Per

*4. Service charges are variable and are not included

5. Date assured tenancy commenced 8 May 2021

6. Length of the term or rental period Monthly

7. Allocation of liability for repairs As per tenancy agreement

8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord none

9. Description of premises First floor 1 bedroom flat

[NAME] of Decision 27 September 2023

1

Case Reference

: HS/LON/00AH/MNR/2023/0322

Property : [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant

: Mr [APPELLANT]

Landlord : [RESPONDENT] of Objection : 13 July 2023

Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988

Tribunal

: Mr [NAME] [NAME] Mrs [NAME] of Summary Reasons

: 27 September 2023

_______________________________________________

DECISION

The Tribunal determines a rent of £800 per calendar month with effect from 8 August 2023. FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

2 ___________________________________

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023

SUMMARY REASONS

Background 1. On 19 June 2023 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £ 1000.00 per month in place of the existing rent of £ 800.00 per month to take effect from 8 August 2023.

2. On 13 July 2023 under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent. The Tenant’s referral was received by the Tribunal on 19 July 2023

Inspection

3. The Tribunal has carried out an inspection of the property on 27 September 2023. The property was found to be cramped with access directly off the staircase to the living room/kitchen. Cooking facilities were considered below standard. The staircase is dark and unattractive.

Evidence 4. The Tribunal held a hearing attended by the Tenant and has considered of the written submissions provided by the Landlord.

Determination and Valuation

5. Having consideration of the comparable evidence proved by the parties and of our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in its current condition would be in the region of £800 per calendar month.

6. The Tribunal determines a rent of £800 per calendar month.

Decision

7. The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy was £800 per calendar month.

8. The Tribunal directed the new rent of £800 per month to take effect on 8 August 2023 being the date set out in the Landlord’s notice.

Chairman: [NAME]: 27 September 2023

3

APPEAL PROVISIONS

These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent based on comparable rental evidence.
  • The rent should be adjusted if the property is in disrepair or poor condition.
  • Rent adjustments must consider the condition of the property.
  • Local market conditions are used to determine fair market rent.
  • The tenant is entitled to a rent determination under the Housing Act 1988.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The rent for a tenant's assured periodic tenancy was set at £800 per month.

Who was involved?

A tenant and their landlord were involved in the case.

How did the court decide, and why?

The Tribunal inspected the property and considered evidence from similar properties to determine that £800 per month reflects the open market rent.

Which laws or rules were applied?

Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988 was used to set the rent based on market value.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The evidence from similar properties and the inspection of the property played a crucial role in setting the rent at £800 per month.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision supported the tenant's position, as the rent was set lower than what the landlord proposed.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

A tenant can challenge a proposed rent increase by referring it to the Tribunal if they believe it is not fair or reasonable based on market conditions.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The inspection report and comparable rental values from similar properties were key pieces of evidence.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, either party can appeal the decision to a higher court if they disagree with it.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is advisable to seek legal advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.