First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal set the market rent for an assured periodic tenancy at £1196.25 per month, reducing the landlord's proposed rent of £1450 based on the property's current state and tenant improvements.
⚖️ Legal holding
A landlord is entitled to propose a new rent under Section 13 of the Housing Act 1988, subject to determination by the Tribunal.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the open-market rent based on what a willing landlord would charge for a similar tenancy. Additionally, tenants can also challenge a new rent proposed by the landlord under section 13(2) or 13A(2) of the same act.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
Tribunal determined the market rent for an assured periodic tenancy.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined the market rent for an assured periodic tenancy, adjusting a proposed rent of £1450 to £1196.25 per month after considering property condition and improvements.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed in Part
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. JM/LON/00AH/MNR/2023/0311
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 46 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
[NAME] Valuer 0079475 [RESPONDENT]
Landlord [COMPANY] 82-84 South End, Croydon, [POSTCODE]
Tenant [NAME]
1. The rent is: £ 1196.25 Per Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 1st August 2023
*3. The amount included for services is/is
negligible/not applicable Nil Per Month
*4. Service charges are variable and are not included
5. Date assured tenancy commenced Before 1st August 2022
6. Length of the term or rental period Monthly
7. Allocation of liability for repairs As per the tenancy agreement dated 20th July 2022
8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord Cooker, Hob and all floor coverings except carpet to stairs.
9. Description of premises A second storey maisonette in a Local Authority built block of similar properties located in an established residential area. The accommodation comprises: kitchen, lounge, two bedrooms and bathroom/WC.
[NAME] of Decision 16 October 2023
1
Case Reference
: JM/LON/00AH/MNR/2023/0311
Property : 46 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Tenant
: [APPELLANT]
Landlord : Mr [RESPONDENT] and Ms [RESPONDENT] of Objection : 10 July 2023
Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988
Tribunal
: [NAME] QPM
Date of Summary Reasons
: 16 October 2023
_______________________________________________
DECISION
The Tribunal determines a rent of £1196.25 per calendar month with effect from 1 August 2023. ____________________________________
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023
FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
2
SUMMARY REASONS
Background 1. On 22 June 2023 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £1,450 per month in place of the existing rent of £1ooo per month to take effect from 1 August 2023.
2. On 10 July 2023 under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent.
Inspection 3. The Tribunal has carried out an inspection of the property on 16 October 2023. The Landlord attended the property as did Mr [RESPONDENT] of [COMPANY]. The Landlord was not permitted internal access to the premise at inspection by Tribunal.
Evidence 4. The Tribunal has consideration of the written submissions provided by the Tenant and the Landlord.
Determination and Valuation 5. Having consideration of their our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in its current condition would be in the region of £1,450 per calendar month. From this level of rent we have made adjustments to reflect tenant improvements, tenant furniture and floor coverings, dilapidation and obsolescence at the property.
6. The full valuation is shown below:
Decision
3 7. The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy was £1196.25 per calendar month.
8. The Tribunal directed the new rent of £1196.25 to take effect on 1 August 2023. This being the date as set out in the Landlord’s Notice of Increase
Chairman: [NAME]: 16 October 2023
APPEAL PROVISIONS
You can only appeal if the First-tier Tribunal decision was wrong on one or more points of law and you must say why the First-tier Tribunal was wrong in law. These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision.
If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Market Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Tenant
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Market Rent of £1,800 for Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Determines Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Market Rent at £2,400 Per Month
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Rent at £700 per Month for Assured Tenancy
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The Tribunal used its own expert knowledge of rental values in the area to determine the market rent.
- The Tribunal adjusted the market rent downwards to account for improvements made by the tenant.
- The Tribunal reduced the market rent to reflect furniture and floor coverings provided by the tenant.
- The Tribunal lowered the market rent due to the property's state of dilapidation and obsolescence.
- The new rent was set to take effect from the date specified in the landlord's original notice.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal set a new market rent for an assured periodic tenancy.
Who was involved?
A landlord proposed a higher rent, while the tenant contested it with the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber).
How did the court decide, and why?
The Tribunal inspected the property and considered written submissions to determine a fair market rent.
Which laws or rules were applied?
Housing Act 1988 Section 14 was used to set the new rent.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The condition of the property and tenant improvements influenced the final decision.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
It was partially in favour of the tenant, reducing the proposed rent.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
A tenant can challenge a landlord's proposed rent increase through the First-tier Tribunal.
What evidence or documents mattered?
The property inspection and written submissions from both parties were crucial.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, but only on points of law with specific reasons provided by the full reasons document.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is advisable to seek legal advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.
