VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Tribunal Determines Market Rent for Assured Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal set a new rent of £1,900 per month for an assured periodic tenancy after the tenant disputed the landlord's proposed increase. The decision was based on evidence provided by both parties and general knowledge of rental values in Poplar.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to have a new rent set by the First-tier Tribunal if they dispute a landlord's proposed increase under Section 13 of the Housing Act 1988.

Topics

tenancy disputesrent determination

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant with an assured tenancy to apply to the appropriate tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tenant can also challenge a new rent proposed in a notice under sections 13(2) or 13A(2). The tribunal will then determine the rent at which the property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord under similar conditions.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined the market rent for an assured periodic tenancy in Poplar, London, setting it at £1,900 per month.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal determined a new rent of £1,900 per month for an assured periodic tenancy in Poplar, London. The tenant objected to the landlord's proposed increase under Section 13 of the Housing Act 1988 and referred it to the tribunal.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. TR/LON/00BG/MNR/2023/0210

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], Cityview point, [POSTCODE]

[NAME]

Landlord [NAME] 1 2 Berry St, London, ECV1 0AU

Tenant [APPELLANT] & [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £ 1,900 Per Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 28th May 2023

*3. The amount included for services is not applicable

Per

*4. Service charges are not included

5. Date assured tenancy commenced 28th February 2022

6. Length of the term or rental period 12 Months

7. Allocation of liability for repairs In accordance with agreement

8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord One bed.

9. Description of premises A purpose built second floor flat forming part of a six, eleven storey block comprising 2 bedrooms, kitchen, living. room, bathroom/wc

[NAME] of Decision 31st October 2023

1

Case Reference

: LON/OOBG/MNR/2023/0210

Property : [ADDRESS], Cityview Point, Poplar, London E14 OLL

Tenant

: [APPELLANT] & [APPELLANT]

Landlord : [COMPANY] of Objection : 26th April 2023

Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988

Tribunal

: Mr [NAME] of Summary Reasons

: 31st October 2023

_______________________________________________

DECISION

The Tribunal determines a rent of £1,900 per calendar month with effect from 28th May 2023. ____________________________________

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023

FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

2

SUMMARY REASONS

Background 1. On the 12th April the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £1,950 per month in place of the existing rent of £1,550 per month to take effect from 25th May 2023.

2. On the 26th April under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent. The Tenant’s referral was received by the Tribunal on the 28th April 2023

Inspection

3. The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties.

Evidence

4. The Tribunal has consideration of the written submissions provided by the tenant. There were no written submissions from the landlord.

Determination and Valuation 5. Having consideration our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the Poplar area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in its current condition would be £1,900 per month. From this level of rent we have made no adjustments in relation to condition.

6. The Tribunal determines a rent of £1,900 per calendar month.

Decision 8. The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy was £1,900 per calendar month.

9. The Tribunal directs the new rent of £1,900 to take effect on the 28th May 2023. This being the date set out in the Landlord’s Notice of Increase and the Tribunal was satisfied that a starting date of that specified in the Landlord’s notice would cause the tenant undue hardship.

Chairman: [NAME]: 31 October 2023

APPEAL PROVISIONS

3

These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The Tribunal used its own expert knowledge of local rental values to determine the market rent.
  • The Tribunal considered the written submissions provided by the tenant.
  • The Tribunal determined the open market rent for the property to be £1,900 per month.
  • The new rent was directed to take effect from the date specified in the landlord's notice.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The tribunal set a new rent of £1,900 per month for an assured periodic tenancy.

Who was involved?

A tenant and a landlord were involved in the dispute over rent increase.

How did the court decide, and why?

The decision was based on evidence provided by both parties and general knowledge of rental values in Poplar.

Which laws or rules were applied?

Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988 was applied to determine the market rent.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The tenant's objection to the proposed increase under Section 13 of the Housing Act 1988 was central to the decision.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was in favour of the tenant, setting a lower rent than initially proposed by the landlord.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone facing a rent increase can refer it to the tribunal if they believe the proposed rent is not fair or reasonable.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Written submissions from both parties and general knowledge of rental values were considered.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions can typically be appealed within specified time limits to higher courts.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is advisable to seek legal advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.