VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Market Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on a fair market rent for an assured periodic tenancy. They set the rent at £1,440 per month after considering the landlord's proposal and local rental values.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair market rent for their assured periodic tenancy.

Topics

tenancymarket rent determination

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant with an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their tenancy. The tribunal will then determine a fair market rent based on what a willing landlord would charge for a similar property in the open market.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined a market rent for an assured periodic tenancy.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined a fair market rent of £1,440 per month for an assured periodic tenancy, taking into account the landlord's proposal and the current rental values in the area.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. GB/LON/00AY/MNR/2024/0044

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 28 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME] Valuer 79475

Landlord [RESPONDENT], St. [ADDRESS], Newcastle upon Tyne, [POSTCODE]

Tenant [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £1440.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 1 February 2024

3. The amount included for services is

not applicable Nil Per n/a

4. Date assured tenancy commenced 1 October 1994

5. Length of the term or rental period Monthly

6. Allocation of liability for repairs In accordance with AST agreement

7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None

8. Description of premises A first floor flat in a two storey property that comprises one reception room, two bedrooms kitchen and bathroom/wc. The premises include a garden.

[NAME] of Decision 22 May 2024

1

Case Reference

: LON/00AY/MNR/2024/0044

Property : 28 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant

: [APPELLANT]

Landlord : [APPELLANT] of Application : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988

Tribunal

: [NAME] B [NAME] Valuer 79475

Date of Summary Reasons

: 22 May 2024

_______________________________________________

DECISION

The Tribunal determines a rent of £ 1440 per month with effect from 1 February 2024. ____________________________________

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023

FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

2

SUMMARY REASONS

Background 1. On 15 June 2023 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £1,625 in place of the existing rent of £1,390 per month to take effect from 1 February 2024

2. On 12 January 2024 under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent.

Inspection 3. The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties.

Evidence 4. There were no written submissions from the parties.

Determination and Valuation 5. Having consideration of our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in its current condition would be in the region of £1,800 per month . From this level of rent we have made adjustments to reflect tenant improvements, tenant furniture and floor coverings, dilapidation and obsolescence at the property.

6. The full valuation is shown below:

Decision 8. The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy was £1,440 per month.

9. The Tribunal directed the new rent of £1,440 to take effect on 1 February 2024. This being the date as set out in the Landlord’s Notice of Increase.

3

Chairman: [NAME]: 22 May 2024

APPEAL PROVISIONS

You can only appeal if the First-tier Tribunal decision was wrong on one or more points of law and you must say why the First-tier Tribunal was wrong in law. These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision.

If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons. Should you decide to pursue this matter then the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent for their assured periodic tenancy.
  • The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent for their property under an assured periodic tenancy.
  • A tenant is entitled to a fair market rent determination based on the condition and location of the property.
  • A tenant is entitled to a fair rent adjustment based on the property's condition and market conditions.
  • A tenant is entitled to a rent adjustment based on the condition of the property.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It decided on a fair market rent of £1,440 per month for an assured periodic tenancy.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the current rental values in the area and the landlord's proposal.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the current market value of similar properties in the area.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation can expect a fair market rent to be determined based on current rental values.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The evidence included the landlord's proposal and the current rental values in the area.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, a decision like this can be appealed if there are grounds to believe the First-tier Tribunal was wrong on a point of law.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.