Tribunal Sets Higher Rent for Assured Tenancy
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal decided on a higher rent for an assured periodic tenancy, setting the rent at £231.25 per week instead of the landlord's proposed £116.02 per week.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a fair market rent for their assured periodic tenancy.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant with an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine a fair market rent, considering what a willing landlord would charge for a similar tenancy in the open market.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined a higher rent than proposed by the landlord.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal determined a rent of £231.25 per week for an assured periodic tenancy, rejecting the landlord's proposed rent of £116.02 per week, based on the open market value of the property.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00AL/MNR/2024/061
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 211 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
[NAME] Valuer
Landlord [NAME] 45 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Tenant Mr [APPELLANT]
1. The rent is: £ 231 Per week (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 19 August 2024
*3. The amount included for services is/is
negligible/not applicable 21.34 Per week
5. Date assured tenancy commenced 20 January 2014
6. Length of the term or rental period Weekly
7. Allocation of liability for repairs In accordance with relevant lease clauses
8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None
9. Description of premises A second floor, one bedroomed flat with a lounge, kitchen one bedroom and bathroom/wc. The dwelling forms part of a low rise development on an established residential estate with nearby non-designated car parking. [NAME] of Decision 9 December 2024
1
Case Reference
: LON/00AL/MNR/2024/0611
Property : 211 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Tenant
: Mr [APPELLANT]
Landlord : [NAME] of Objection : 2 August 2024
Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988
Tribunal
: [NAME] B [NAME] valuer
Date of Summary Reasons
: December 9, 2024
_______________________________________________
DECISION
The Tribunal determines a rent of £231.25 per week inclusive of service charge with effect from 19 August 2024. The Tribunal understand that the Landlord proposes to charge a lower rent of £116.02 per week inclusive of service charge ___________________________________
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023 FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
2
SUMMARY REASONS
Background 1. On 11 July 2024 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £ 116.00 in place of the existing rent of £ 107.50 per week to take effect from 19 August 2024.
2. On 2 August 2024 under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent.
Inspection 3. The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties.
Evidence 4. There were no written submissions from the parties.
Determination and Valuation 5. Having consideration from our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in its current condition would be in the region of £250 per calendar week. From this level of rent we have made adjustments to reflect tenant improvements, tenant furniture and floor coverings, dilapidation and obsolescence at the property.
6. The full valuation is shown below:
3 Decision 8. The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy was £231.25 per week inclusive of the service charge. The Tribunal understand that the Landlord proposes to charge a lower rent of £116.02 per week inclusive of service charge.
9. The Tribunal directed that a new rent of £231.25 per week or the lower proposed rent of £116.02 to take effect on 19 August 2024. This being the date as set out in the Landlord’s Notice of Increase
Chairman: [NAME]: 9 December 2024
GUIDANCE ON APPEAL PROVISIONS
These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision.
You can only appeal if the First-tier Tribunal decision was wrong on one or more points of law and you must say why the First-tier Tribunal was wrong in law.
If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal sets new rent for assured periodic tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Market Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Market Rent Set for Assured Tenancy - First-tier Tribunal Decision
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Reduces Proposed Rent Due to Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Due to Health and Safety Issues
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent for their assured periodic tenancy.
- The fair market rent is adjusted based on the condition of the property.
- The fair market rent takes into account provided amenities in the property.
- Health and safety compliance issues can lead to a rent adjustment.
- Market conditions and local rental values influence the fair market rent.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal set a higher rent of £231.25 per week for the assured periodic tenancy.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved in the dispute over the rent.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the open market value of the property and adjustments for improvements and furniture.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988 was applied to determine the market rent.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the valuation of the property based on market conditions.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant who brought the case.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation may also seek a fair market rent for their assured periodic tenancy.
What evidence or documents mattered?
The evidence included the valuation report and the lease clauses.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed if there are grounds to challenge the legal basis of the decision.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is always recommended to get advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.
