VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Tribunal Sets Market Rent for HMO Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The Tribunal decided on a fair market rent of £810 per month for a tenant living in a room within a House in Multiple Occupation (HMO). The decision was based on the property's condition and its location near the Abbey Wood station.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair market rent for their property under an assured periodic tenancy.

Topics

rent determinationassured periodic tenancyHMO

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their tenancy. The tribunal will then determine a fair market rent for the property, considering factors such as the property's condition, location, and comparable rents in the area.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined the market rent for a property in a House in Multiple Occupation (HMO).

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined the market rent for a property in a House in Multiple Occupation (HMO) to be £810 per month, effective from 1 April 2025. The decision was based on the property's condition, location, and comparable rents in the area.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. HS/LON/00AL/MNR/2025/0769

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 8 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Mr [NAME] [NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT]

Landlord B & M [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Tenant Augustine Matthew Senenssie

1. The rent is: £ 810 Per month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 1 April 2025

*3. The amount included for services is

not applicable

Per

*4. Service charges are variable and are not included

5. Date assured tenancy commenced 28 February 2021

6. Length of the term or rental period Monthly

7. Allocation of liability for repairs Landlord

8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord Desk, double bed, mattress, bedside table, wardrobe

9. Description of premises Room in a an HMO with shared kitchen/diner and shower/WC room.

Chairman Mr [NAME] [NAME] of Decision 20 October 2025

(c)

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : HS/LON/00AL/MNR/2025/0769 Property :

8 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Tenant : Mr. [COUNSEL] : In person Landlord : [RESPONDENT] : Ms. [COUNSEL], Director Type of [NAME] : Section 13 Housing Act 1988 Tribunal Members : Mr [NAME] Mr [NAME] and venue of Hearing : 10 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] 12 September 2025 Date of Decision : 20 October 2025

_______________________________________________

DECISION

___________________________________

2 Decision

(1) The market rent of the property is £810 per month with effect from 1 April 2025.

Reasons

Background

1. The property is Room 1 in a licensed House in Multiple Occupation at 8 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]. The Tenant has shared use of a kitchen bathroom and garden.

2. On 20 January 2025 the Landlord served a notice under the Housing Act 1988 (“the Act”) which proposed a new rent of £850 per month in place of the existing rent of £765 per month to take effect from 1 April 2025.

3. On 31 March 2025 under section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent.

4. The tenancy is an assured periodic tenancy. From the tenancy agreement, a copy of which was provided with the [NAME], the assured tenancy commenced on 28 February 2021 as an assured shorthold tenancy.

5. The property was the subject of a rent determination by the Tribunal of 11 October 2024 for which Reasons were given.

Directions

6. On 25 June 20254, the Tribunal issued directions to the parties. The [NAME] was set down for a determination on the papers without a hearing or inspection, unless either party requested these, which the tenant did. The landlord was directed to complete a reply form giving details of the property, further comments, and any documents upon which the Tribunal was to rely, by 16 July 2025. The tenant was directed to do likewise by 30 July 2025. The landlord was entitled to submit a reply by 6 August 2025. A hybrid hearing took place on 12 September 2025 at which the tenant attended [ADDRESS] in person and the landlord attended via video link.

The Property

7. The Tribunal adopts the description given in the 2024 Reasons. In summary the tenancy is room one within a Victorian redbrick terraced house. This has been converted into two double rooms on the ground and three ensuite rooms on the first floor within a licenced HMO. The ground floor rooms have shared facilities. The tribunal inspected the

3 property on 12 September 2025 in the presence of the tenant and Ms [APPELLANT] who represented the landlord. The subject room is a large double bedroom with a bay window facing [ADDRESS]. There is one set of double sockets. Above the sockets was an area of plaster discolouration caused by damp. There is an area of ceiling discolouration. There is a radiator and a sink. The hallway and kitchen contain two radiators neither of which were on at the time of inspection. There is a communal shower and WC room on the ground floor and a communal kitchen/diner. There is a garden at the rear of the property.

The Landlord’s Case

8. The landlord supplied a reply form which noted the size of each room on the ground floor. The landlord stated that it had provided central heating double glazing carpets curtains and white goods. The new boiler was installed in October 2024, new roof in May 2023 and double-glazing windows were upgraded in February 2025. The landlord submitted that since the Elizabeth Line Abbey Wood station had come into use, local rents had increased by at least 20%.

9. Ms [NAME] said that water leaks have been dealt with, and access had previously been refused. The door closure issue had not been reported. A room upstairs been let at £975 month from 1 April 2025. The tenant of room two was in financial difficulties paying £735 per month. She provided her own white goods. The rent was inclusive of council tax, water, internet, electricity and gas charges. These were £300 per room per month. The landlord did not provide any other comparables.

The Tenant’s Case

10. The tenant provided a reply form. The tenant submitted that he provided white goods. He complained that the boiler replacement was not completed. He complained about a rat infestation in the room, faulty electrical installation, crack walls, mould, water leaks, a damaged door and faulty electrical sockets due to water leaks. He submitted that the ground floor radiators were not working, and the ground floor bathroom had mould and damp to the ceiling. He could not use the kitchen at night. In the hearing he confirmed that he had installed a fridge freezer in his room. His rent should be £450 a month. The tenant of room 2 was paying £450 per month.

The Law

11. The law as to the Tribunal’s approach is given at section 14 of the Act which insofar as relevant is as follows:

(1)Where, under subsection (4)(a) of section 13 above, a tenant refers to a Tribunal a notice under subsection (2) of that section, the Tribunal shall determine the rent at which, subject to subsections (2) and (4) below, the Tribunal consider that the dwelling-house concerned might

4 reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy— (a)which is a periodic tenancy having the same periods as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; (b)which begins at the beginning of the new period specified in the notice; (c)the terms of which (other than relating to the amount of the rent) are the same as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; [...].

Determination

12. The Tribunal accepts the landlord’s evidence of the current rent for room 2, and that the rent for room 2 of £735 per month reflects the personal circumstances of the tenant. It also accepts that this room was approximately 10 sq. m rather than 15 sq.m for the subject property and that room 2 also has a much smaller window.

13. The letting for an upstairs room was for an ensuite which is significantly better. The tribunal determines that the room one in good condition would attract a rent of £900 per month.

14. In terms of condition, the Tribunal did not notice evidence of pest infestation. It noticed damp staining. It also notes that the landlord was not made aware of the door closure being broken. The uPVC windows appeared to be in good condition. The shower room did show evidence of mould to the ceiling. The kitchen/diner appeared adequate but there were signs of damp penetration to plasterwork.

15. In view of the overall condition of the shared areas and the condition of the room itself the Tribunal determines a rent of £810 per calendar month.

16. The tenant did not make submissions in relation to undue hardship Under section 14(7) of the Act. Accordingly the rent of £810 per month takes effect from 1 April 2025.

Chairman: [NAME]: 20 October 2025

5

APPEAL PROVISIONS

ANNEX - RIGHTS OF APPEAL

• The Tribunal is required to set out rights of appeal against its decisions by virtue of the rule 36 (2)(c) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013 and these are set out below.

• If a party wishes to appeal against this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) then a written [NAME] for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case.

• The [NAME] for permission to appeal must arrive at the Regional office within 28 days after the Tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the [NAME].

• If the [NAME] is not made within the 28-day time limit, such [NAME] must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28- day time limit; the Tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the [NAME] for permission to appeal to proceed despite not being within the time limit.

• The [NAME] for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party [NAME] the [NAME] is seeking.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 11 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent for their assured periodic tenancy.
  • The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent adjusted for the condition of the property.
  • The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent adjusted for the condition of the property and provided amenities.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal set the market rent for the tenant's property at £810 per month.

Who was involved?

The tenant challenged a proposed rent increase by the landlord.

How did the court decide, and why?

The Tribunal considered the property's condition and location to determine a fair market rent.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988, specifically section 14, was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The condition of the property and its proximity to the Abbey Wood station were key factors.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant, setting a fair market rent.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation may also challenge a proposed rent increase if they believe it is unfair.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Evidence of the property's condition and comparable rents in the area were important.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal within 28 days.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.