VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on a new rent of £2220 per month for an assured periodic tenancy, taking into account the current condition of the property, particularly damp issues.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair market rent for their assured periodic tenancy, adjusted for the condition of the property.

Topics

tenancy agreementrent adjustmentproperty condition

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant with an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their tenancy. The tribunal will then determine a fair market rent for the property, considering the condition of the property and comparing it to similar properties in the open market.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined a new rent for an assured periodic tenancy based on comparable evidence and adjustments for property condition.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined a new rent of £2220 per month for an assured periodic tenancy, effective from 14 October 2024, after considering comparable evidence and adjusting for damp issues in the property.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/OOAK/MNR/2024/0662

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination or Section 22 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 2 Prospect Cottages, London, [POSTCODE]

R Waterhouse FRICS

Landlord [NAME] 297 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Tenant [NAME]

1. The rent is: £ £2220 Per month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 14 October 2024

*3. The amount included for services is/is

negligible/not applicable n/a Per

*4. Service charges are variable and are not included

5. Date assured tenancy commenced 13 May 2021

6. Length of the term or rental period Statutory periodic tenancy

7. Allocation of liability for repairs Landlord exterior structure tenant interior

8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord n/a

9. Description of premises Terraced house, 3-bedroom, one bathroom, and one living room

Chairman R Waterhouse FRICS Date of Decision 16 January 2025

1

Case Reference

: LON/OOAK/MNR/2024/0662

Property : 2 Prospect Cottages, London [POSTCODE]

Tenant

: [APPELLANT]

Landlord : [APPELLANT] [NAME] of Objection : 17 September 2024

Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988

Tribunal

: [NAME] of Summary Reasons

: 16 January 2024

_______________________________________________

DECISION

The Tribunal determines a rent of £2220.00 per calendar month with effect from 14 October 2024. ____________________________________

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023 FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

2

SUMMARY REASONS

Background 1. The Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £ 2250.00 per month in place of the existing rent of £ 1650.00 per month to take effect from 14 October 2024.

2. On 17 September 2024 under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent. The Tenant’s referral was received by the Tribunal on 17 September 2024.

Inspection 3. The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties.

Evidence 4. The Tribunal has consideration of the written submissions provided by the Tenant and the Landlord.

Determination and Valuation 5. Having consideration of the comparable evidence proved by the parties and of our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in good tenantable condition/its current condition would be in the region of £2400.00 per calendar month/week. From this level of rent we have made adjustments in relation to:

Photographic evidence submitted by tenant showing damp ingress along a lintel area.

6. The full valuation is shown below:

per calendar month Market Rent

£2400.00

Less List any deductions damp ) 7.5%

£180.00

£2220.00

7. The Tribunal determines a rent of £2220.00 per calendar month.

Decision 8. The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy was £2220.00 per calendar month.

3 9. The Tribunal directs the new rent of £2220.00 per calendar month to take effect on 14 October 2024. This being the date as set out in the Landlord’s Notice of Increase.

Chairman:

R Waterhouse FRICS

Date: 16 January 2025

APPEAL PROVISIONS

These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any request for full reasons should be made within a month. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent.
  • Rent adjustments should consider the condition of the property.
  • Rent adjustments should take into account provided amenities.
  • Health and safety compliance issues affect rent adjustments.
  • Specific property conditions should be considered in rent adjustments.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It set a new rent of £2220 per month for an assured periodic tenancy.

Who was involved?

A tenant and a landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on comparable evidence and adjusted for damp issues in the property.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 section 14 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument about the property's condition, especially dampness, was crucial.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should ensure their property is in good condition and provide evidence of comparable rents.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Photographic evidence of dampness and comparable evidence of rents were important.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed within a month of the decision.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.