First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent at £1875 Per Month
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal set the rent at £1875 per month for an assured periodic tenancy. The decision was based on a comparison of similar properties in the area and adjustments for various factors affecting the property's value.
⚖️ Legal holding
A landlord must determine the open market rent for an assured periodic tenancy by reference to comparable properties and relevant factors such as tenant improvements and dilapidations.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable. However, the application cannot be made if the rent is based on a previous determination under this section or if more than six months have passed since the start of the tenancy. Additionally, when determining the open market rent, the tribunal should disregard any increase in the property's value due to improvements made by the tenant or any decrease due to the tenant's failure to comply with the tenancy terms.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined the market rent for an assured periodic tenancy after considering comparable evidence and adjustments.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal determined the market rent for an assured periodic tenancy to be £1875 per month after considering comparable evidence and making adjustments for tenant improvements, dilapidations, and other factors.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed in Part
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. JM/LON/00AE/MNR/2023/0227
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 8 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Ian B Holdsworth FRICS RICS Registered Valuer 0079475 [NAME] [RESPONDENT]
Landlord [RESPONDENT] on behalf of [NAME] [RESPONDENT] [NAME] 113-115 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Tenant [NAME] [APPELLANT] [NAME] & Ms [APPELLANT]
1. The rent is: £ 1875.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 17 October 2023
*3. The amount included for services is/is
negligible/not applicable N/a Per N/a
*4. Service charges are variable and are not included
5. Date assured tenancy commenced 24/03/2019
6. Length of the term or rental period Monthly
7. Allocation of liability for repairs As per tenancy agreement
8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord White goods only, all other furniture provided by the tenant.
9. Description of premises A semi-detached two storey extended house with driveway and garden situated on a interwar built housing estate of similar dwellings. The accommodation comprises: Entrance hall, downstairs toilet, through lounge, dining room, kitchen, 3 bedrooms and bathroom/WC. There are two sheds and a car port.
Chairman Ian B Holdsworth Date of Decision 17 October 2023
1
Case Reference
: JM/LON/00AE/MNR/2023/0227
Property : 8 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Tenant: : [NAME] [APPELLANT] [NAME] Ms [APPELLANT]
Landlord : [NAME] [COUNSEL] [NAME]
: [RESPONDENT] of Objection : 13 May 2023
Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988
Tribunal
: [NAME] Valuer 0079475 [NAME] [NAME] of Summary Reasons
: 17 October 2023
_______________________________________________
DECISION
The Tribunal determines a rent of £1875 per calendar month with effect from 17 October 2023. ____________________________________ FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
2
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023
SUMMARY REASONS
Background 1. On 11 May 2023 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £2300 in place of the existing rent of £1700 per month to take effect from 3 July 2023.
2. On 13 May 2023 under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent.
Inspection 3. The Tribunal has carried out an inspection of the property on 17 October 2023
Evidence 4. The Tribunal has consideration of the written submissions provided by the Tenant and the Landlord.
Determination and Valuation 5. Having consideration of the comparable evidence proved by the parties and of our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in its current condition would be in the region of £2500 per calendar month. From this level of rent we have made adjustments to reflect tenant improvements, tenant furniture and floor coverings, dilapidation and obsolescence at the property.
6. The full valuation is shown below:
3
Decision 8. The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy was £1875 per calendar month.
9. The Tribunal directed the new rent of £1875 to take effect on 17 October 2023. The Tribunal was satisfied that a starting date of that specified in the Landlord’s notice would cause the tenant undue hardship].
Chairman: Ian B Holdsworth Date: 17 October 2023
APPEAL PROVISIONS
These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision.
If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA. You can only appeal if the First-tier Tribunal decision was wrong on one or more points of law and you must say why the First-tier Tribunal was wrong in law.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Market Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Market Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Tenant
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Assured Tenancy Rent at £1620 Monthly
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent at £1750 per Month
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent at £2,125 Monthly
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent at £1680 per Month
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent based on the property's condition and location.
- The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent adjusted for specific property conditions.
- The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent based on comparable evidence and local rental values.
- The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent adjusted for any tenant-provided furnishings.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal set the rent at £1875 per month for an assured periodic tenancy.
Who was involved?
A tenant and a landlord were involved in the dispute over the rental amount.
How did the court decide, and why?
The Tribunal decided based on evidence of comparable properties and adjustments for factors like improvements and dilapidations.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988 Section 14 was used to determine the market rent.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The evidence of comparable properties and adjustments for factors affecting the property's value were crucial in determining the rent.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
It was a compromise, setting a lower rent than proposed by the landlord but higher than initially paid by the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone facing a rent increase can seek a fair market valuation through the First-tier Tribunal.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Comparable rental agreements and property condition reports were important.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, either party may appeal if they believe there was an error in law.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is advisable to seek legal advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.
