First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent at £1750 per Month
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal set the rent at £1750 per month after considering comparable rental prices in the area. The tenant did not attend an inspection but provided written submissions.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to have their rent set at a fair and reasonable level based on comparable properties in the area.
📖 What the law says
Under this rule, a tenant with an assured tenancy can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their tenancy. The tribunal will then determine a fair and reasonable rent based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive for letting the property in the open market. The determination considers the terms of the existing tenancy and disregards certain factors such as improvements made by the tenant or reductions due to non-compliance.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined the market rent for an assured periodic tenancy.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal determined the market rent for an assured periodic tenancy, adjusting from a proposed £1600 to £1750 based on comparable properties and property condition.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed in Part
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. MAM/LON/00AE/MNR/2023/0307
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 32 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
[NAME] Valuer Mr [RESPONDENT]
Landlord [APPELLANT] 22 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Tenant Miss [APPELLANT]
1. The rent is: £ 1750 Per Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 10 July 2023
*3. The amount included for services is/is
negligible/not applicable N/a Per N/a
5. Date assured tenancy commenced 3/12/2010
6. Length of the term or rental period Monthly
7. Allocation of liability for repairs As tenancy agreement
8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None
9. Description of premises A ground floor flat in a two storey purpose built block of 2 flats with 2 maisonettes above all with private garden at rear. The accommodation comprises: Entrance hallway, lounge, two bedrooms, kitchen, bathroom and separate wc.
[NAME] of Decision 17 October 2023
1
Case Reference
: MAM/LON/00AE/MNR/2023/0307
Property : 32 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Tenant
: Miss [APPELLANT]
Landlord : [RESPONDENT] of Objection : 7 July 2023
Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988
Tribunal
: [NAME] Valuer Mr [NAME] of Summary Reasons
: 17 October 2023
_______________________________________________
DECISION
The Tribunal determines a rent of £1750 per calendar month with effect from 10 July 2023. ____________________________________
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023 FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
2
SUMMARY REASONS
Background 1. On 19 May 2023 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £1600 per month in place of the existing rent of £1040 per month to take effect from 10 July 2023
2. On 7 July 2023 under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent.
Inspection 3. The Tribunal has carried out an external inspection of the property on 17 October 2023. The tenant failed to attend at the arranged inspection date and time and consequently no internal access was possible.
Evidence 4. The Tribunal has consideration of the written submissions provided by the Tenant and the Landlord.
Determination and Valuation 5. Having consideration of the comparable evidence proved by the parties and of our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in its current condition would be in the region of £2000 per calendar month. From this level of rent we have made adjustments to reflect tenant improvements, tenant furniture and floor coverings, dilapidation and obsolescence at the property.
6. The full valuation is shown below:
3 Decision 8. The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy is £1750 per calendar month.
9. The Tribunal directed the new rent of £1750 per month to take effect on 10 July 2023. This being the date as set out in the Landlord’s Notice of Increase Chairman: [NAME]: 17 October 2023
APPEAL PROVISIONS
These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision.
If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA. You can only appeal if the First-tier Tribunal decision was wrong on one or more points of law and you must say why the First-tier Tribunal was wrong in law.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Tenant
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Market Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Market Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy Dispute
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Assured Tenancy Rent at £1620 Monthly
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent at £1875 Per Month
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent based on comparable properties in the area.
- The rent should be adjusted according to the condition of the property.
- The tenant can challenge a proposed rent increase through the First-tier Tribunal.
- The landlord must provide evidence supporting the proposed rent increase.
- The tribunal determines the fair market rent based on relevant factors including property condition.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
It decided that the market rent for the assured tenancy is £1750 per month.
Who was involved?
The tenant and landlord were involved in a dispute over rent determination.
How did the court decide, and why?
The Tribunal reviewed comparable rental prices and adjusted for property condition and improvements.
Which laws or rules were applied?
Housing Act 1988 Section 14 was applied to determine market rent.
What was the argument that mattered most?
Comparable rental prices in the area were crucial in setting a fair market rent.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was partially for the tenant, as it set a lower rent than initially proposed by the landlord.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone facing a rent increase can seek a fair market valuation through the Tribunal.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Written submissions and comparable rental prices were important in determining the rent.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, either party may appeal if they believe there was an error of law.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is advisable to consult with a qualified solicitor for legal advice and representation.
