VadeLab
Allowed in PartFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Sets Assured Tenancy Rent at £1620 Monthly

Case No.

📌 In brief

In this case, the First-tier Tribunal decided to set the rent for an assured periodic tenancy at £1620 per month after considering the condition of the property and comparing it with similar properties in the area. The decision was made on October 18, 2023.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to have the rent of their assured periodic tenancy set at a level that reflects current market conditions adjusted for property condition.

Topics

tenancyrent determination

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant with an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their tenancy. The tribunal will determine the rent at which the dwelling house might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord under similar conditions.

Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 s.11

The Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, section 11 implies a covenant by the lessor to keep in repair the structure and exterior of the dwelling house, including drains, gutters, and external pipes, as well as installations for water, gas, electricity, and sanitation. This covenant also covers space heating and heating water installations.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined the market rent for an assured periodic tenancy, adjusting for disrepair and dated fittings.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal determined that the rent for an assured periodic tenancy should be set at £1620 per month, adjusting for disrepair and dated fittings. The decision was based on comparable evidence and expert knowledge of rental values in the area.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed in Part

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. HS/LON/00AE/MNR/2023/0332

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Mr A [NAME]

Landlord [RESPONDENT] 42 [ADDRESS],, [POSTCODE]

Tenant [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £ 1620.00 Per month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 18 October 2023

*3. The amount included for services is/is

negligible/not applicable

Per

*4. Service charges are variable and are not included

5. Date assured tenancy commenced 1 October 2016

6. Length of the term or rental period monthly

7. Allocation of liability for repairs Ss11-12 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985

8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord none

9. Description of premises Modern first floor purpose built flat with 2 bedrooms, reception room kitchen and bathroom

Chairman A Harris Date of Decision 18 October 2023

1

Case Reference

: HS/LON/00AE/MNR/2023/0332

Property : [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant

: [APPELLANT] [NAME]

Landlord : [APPELLANT] [NAME] of Objection : 28 July 2023

Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988

Tribunal

: Mr A [NAME] chair

Date of Summary Reasons

: 18 October 2023

_______________________________________________

DECISION

The Tribunal determines a rent of £1620 per calendar month with effect from 18 October 2023. ____________________________________

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023 FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

2 SUMMARY REASONS

Background

1. On 21 June 2023 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £ 1800.00 in place of the existing rent of £ 1120.00 per month to take effect from 1 August 2023.

2. On 28 July 2023 under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent. The Tenant’s referral was received by the Tribunal on 28 July 2023.

Inspection

3. The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties.

Evidence

4. The Tribunal has consideration of the written submissions provided by the Tenant and the Landlord.

5. The submissions reveal disagreement between the parties over the condition of the property but an inspection was not requested. There has clearly been a problem with the roof but the evidence is unclear whether this has been finally resolved. There is also a dispute about the electrical system. The tenant sought the assistance of the Local Authority.

6. The landlord has served notice under s21.

Determination and Valuation

7. Having consideration of the comparable evidence proved by the parties and of our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in the condition and with the amenities the market would expect would be in the region of £1800 per calendar month. From this level of rent we have made adjustments in relation to:

a. The legacy of disrepair and dated fittings

8. The full valuation is shown below:

PCM AST Market rent 1,800.00 £ less condition 10.0% 180.00 -£ 1,620.00 £

3

Decision

9. The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a [NAME] under an assured tenancy was £1620.00 per calendar month.

10. The Tribunal directed the new rent of £1620.00 to take effect on 18 October 2023. The Tribunal was satisfied that a starting date of that specified in the Landlord’s notice would cause the tenant undue hardship.

Chairman: A Harris

Date: 18 October 2023

APPEAL PROVISIONS

These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The Tribunal determined a new rent of £1620 per calendar month.
  • The Tribunal adjusted the market rent downwards due to the property's condition.
  • The new rent takes effect on 18 October 2023.
  • The Tribunal considered that the landlord's proposed start date would cause the tenant hardship.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal set the rent for an assured periodic tenancy at £1620 per month.

Who was involved?

A tenant and a landlord were involved in the dispute over rent determination.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on comparable evidence and expert knowledge of rental values in the area, adjusting for disrepair and dated fittings.

Which laws or rules were applied?

Housing Act 1988 s.14 and Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 ss.11-12 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The condition of the property and comparable rental values in the area were key arguments.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was partially in favour of the tenant, setting a lower rent than proposed by the landlord.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation can refer disputes over rent determination to the First-tier Tribunal for resolution.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Written submissions from both parties and expert knowledge of rental values were important.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions from the First-tier Tribunal can often be appealed to higher courts.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is advisable to seek legal advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.