First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Based on Property Condition
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal decided to adjust the rent for a tenancy to £900 per month, taking into account the property's condition and amenities. This decision reflects the need for a fair rent that considers the actual state of the property.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a fair rent adjustment based on the property's condition and amenities.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant with an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine a fair rent based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive for letting the property in the open market. The determination considers the property's condition and amenities.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal adjusted the proposed rent after considering the property's condition and amenities.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal determined a fair rent of £900 per month for a tenancy, adjusting from the proposed £1000 based on the property's condition and amenities.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00AY/MNR/2025/0836
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination or Section 22 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
[NAME] [NAME]
Landlord [RESPONDENT] c/o [NAME] [POSTCODE]
Tenant Mr [APPELLANT]
1. The rent is: £ 900.00 Per Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 15 September 2025
*3. The amount included for services is/is
negligible/not applicable
Per
*4. Service charges are variable and are not included
5. Date assured tenancy commenced 1999 on succession. Original tenancy circa 1940
6. Length of the term or rental period monthly
7. Allocation of liability for repairs Landlord all repairs Tenant Decoration
8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord cooker
9. Description of premises Ground floor maisonette with 3 rooms kitchen and bathroom. Partial central heating. In unmodernised condition.
[NAME] of Decision 15 September 2025
1
Case Reference : LON/00AY/MNR/2025/0836
Property
: [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Tenant : [APPELLANT]
Landlord : [APPELLANT] of Objection : 23 May 2025
Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988
Tribunal : Mr [NAME] [NAME] of Summary Reasons
: 15 September 2025
_______________________________________________
DECISION
The Tribunal determines a rent of £900 per calendar month with effect from 15 September 2025. ____________________________________
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023
FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
2 SUMMARY REASONS
Background
1. On 8 May 2025 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £ 1000.00 in place of the existing rent of £ 880.00 per month to take effect from 9 June 2025.
2. On 23 May 2025 under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent. The Tenant’s referral was received by the Tribunal on 27 May 2025.
Inspection
3. The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties.
Evidence
4. The Tribunal has considered the written submissions provided by the Tenant and the Landlord.
Determination and Valuation
5. No rental comparable evidence was provided by the parties. The tribunal therefore relied on its own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area. We consider that the open market rent for the property in the condition and with the amenities the market would expect would be in the region of £1800.00 per calendar month. From this level of rent we have made adjustments in relation to:
Limited central heating with surface run pipework Dated kitchen Dated bathroom Limited power sockets No carpets, curtains or white goods apart from a cooker
The tribunal took no account of the decoration which is the tenants responsibility.
6. The full valuation is shown below:
PCM AST Market rent 1,800.00 £ less condition/terms 50.0% 900.00 -£ 900.00 £
3
Decision
8. The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord in its current condition under an assured tenancy was £900 per calendar month.
9. The Tribunal directs the new rent of £900.00 per month to take effect on 15 September 2025. The tenant is in receipt of Housing Benefit and the tribunal was satisfied that a starting date of that specified in the Landlord’s notice would cause the tenant undue hardship.
Chairman: [NAME]: 15 September 2025
APPEAL PROVISIONS
These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Due to Health and Safety Issues
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Due to Health and Safety Issues
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Proposed Rent Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Market Rent of £1,800 for Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Market Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent of £2,200 Per Month
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Market Rent at £2,400 Per Month
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Tenancy - First-tier Tribunal Decision
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant is entitled to a fair rent based on the open market value of the property.
- The tenant is entitled to a fair rent adjustment taking into account the condition of the property.
- A tenant is entitled to a rent adjustment based on health and safety compliance issues.
- The tenant is entitled to a fair rent adjustment based on the property's condition and amenities.
- The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent for their assured periodic tenancy, adjusted for the condition of the property.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal decided to adjust the rent for a tenancy to £900 per month.
Who was involved?
The decision involved a tenant and a landlord.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the property's condition and amenities, adjusting the proposed rent to ensure fairness.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988 section 14 was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the condition and amenities of the property.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation may also seek a fair rent adjustment based on the property's condition.
What evidence or documents mattered?
The condition and amenities of the property were key factors.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is always recommended to get advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.
