VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on a new rent of £896.28 for an assured periodic tenancy, effective from May 1, 2025, after considering local rental values.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair market rent for their assured periodic tenancy as determined by the Tribunal.

Topics

tenancyrent determinationhousing act

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant with an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their tenancy. The tribunal will then determine a fair market rent for the property, considering the open market conditions where a willing landlord would let the property under similar terms.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined a new rent for an assured periodic tenancy based on local rental values.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined a new rent of £896.28 for an assured periodic tenancy, effective from May 1, 2025, based on local rental values and the Housing Act 1988.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00AM/MNR/2025/0754

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination or Section 22 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Mr [RESPONDENT] [NAME]

Landlord [COMPANY] 45 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Tenant [NAME]

1. The rent is: £ 896.28 Per month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 1 May 2025

*3. The amount included for services is/is

negligible/not applicable

Per

*4. Service charges are variable and are not included

5. Date assured tenancy commenced 21 October 2013

6. Length of the term or rental period monthly

7. Allocation of liability for repairs Landlord full repairing

8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord Cooker & fridge

9. Description of premises One room in shared two-bedroom flat with shared kitchen and bathroom

Chairman A Harris Date of Decision 8 September 2025

1

Case Reference : LON/00AM/MNR/2025/0754

Property

: [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Tenant : [APPELLANT]

Landlord : [COMPANY] of Objection : 26 March 2025

Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988

Tribunal : Mr [NAME] [NAME] of Summary Reasons

: 8 September 2025

_______________________________________________

DECISION

The Tribunal determines a rent of £896.28 excluding services per calendar month with effect from 1 May 2025. ____________________________________

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023

FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

2 SUMMARY REASONS

Background 1. On 27 February 2025 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £ 896.28 plus services in place of the existing rent of £ 868.49 plus services per month to take effect from 1 May 2025.

2. On 26 March 2025 under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent. The Tenant’s referral was received by the Tribunal on 26 March 2025.

Inspection 3. The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties.

Evidence 4. The Tribunal has consideration of the written submissions provided by the Tenant. There were no written submissions from the Landlord.

Determination and Valuation

5. No comparable evidence was provided by the parties. The tribunal relied on our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area. We consider that the open market rent for the property in its current condition would be in the region of £896.28 per calendar month.

Decision 8. The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy was £896.28 per calendar month.

9. The Tribunal directs the new rent of £XXX to take effect on 1 May 2025 This being the date as set out in the Landlord’s Notice of Increase.

Chairman: A Harris

Date: 8 September 2025

APPEAL PROVISIONS

These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.

3

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent for their assured periodic tenancy as determined by the Tribunal.
  • The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent for their assured periodic tenancy, as determined by the Tribunal.
  • The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent for an assured periodic tenancy as determined by the Tribunal.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It decided on a new rent of £896.28 for an assured periodic tenancy, effective from May 1, 2025.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on local rental values and the Housing Act 1988.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the determination of fair market rent based on local rental values.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the person who brought the case.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation may also seek a determination of a fair market rent for their assured periodic tenancy.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Written submissions from the tenant and the Housing Act 1988 were important.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is always recommended to get advice from a qualified solicitor for cases like this.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.