Market Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal determined the market rent for an assured periodic tenancy. After reviewing the evidence, the rent was set at £900 per month, effective from May 6, 2025.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a fair market rent for their assured periodic tenancy as determined by the Tribunal.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant with an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their tenancy. The tribunal will then determine a fair market rent based on what a willing landlord would charge for a similar property under an assured periodic tenancy.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined the market rent for an assured periodic tenancy.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal determined the market rent for an assured periodic tenancy after considering comparable evidence and the current state of the property. The rent was set at £900 per month, effective from May 6, 2025.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. HAV/21UF/MNR/2025/0680
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
[NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT]
Landlord [RESPONDENT] c/o [RESPONDENT], 87 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Tenant Mrs [APPELLANT]
1. The rent is: £ 900.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 6 May 2025
3. The amount included for services is not applicable n/a Per n/a
4. Date assured tenancy commenced 6 May 2024
5. Length of the term or rental period Monthly
6. Allocation of liability for repairs Landlord
7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord
8. Description of premises Second floor 1-bedroom flat
[NAME] of Decision 7 July 2025
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2025
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : HAV/21UF/MNR/2025/0680 Property : [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Applicant Tenant : Ms [COUNSEL] [NAME] :
None
Respondent Landlord : [RESPONDENT] : [COUNSEL] [RESPONDENT] of Application :
Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988
Tribunal Members : Mr [NAME] Mr [NAME] of Application : 26th April 2025 Date of Decision : 7th July 2025
DECISION
The Tribunal determines a rent of £900 per calendar month with effect from 6th May 2025.
HAV/21UF/MNR/2025/0680
SUMMARY REASONS
Background 1. On 3rd March 2025 the Landlord’s Agent served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £950 per month in place of the existing rent of £900 per month to take effect from 6th May 2025.
2. On 26th April 2025 under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant(s) referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent. Inspection 3. The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case based on the papers provided by the parties and information freely available on the internet. Evidence
4. The Tribunal has considered the written submissions provided by the Parties. Determination and Valuation 5. Having given consideration to the comparable evidence provided by the parties and of its own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, the Tribunal determines that the open market rent for the property in good tenantable condition would be £950 per calendar month.
6. Such a tenancy would normally include white goods, carpets, curtains/blinds and associated fittings to all be provided by the Landlord.
7. In this case the property is not let in such condition or with white goods, carpets and curtains all supplied so some adjustments to the ‘open market rent’ are necessary. The Landlord does supply a cooker. In addition, the Tribunal has adjusted the monthly rent to take account of the Tenant paying the cost of electricity to the common parts, the parties having agreed that a sum of £20 per month was appropriate.
8. The full valuation is shown below: Full open market rent in good condition £950 Less deductions for:- Tenants’ provision of white goods
£20 Tenant’s provision of curtains/blinds
£10
Tenant’s provision of electricity to common parts £20
____ TOTAL RENT PAYABLE PER MONTH
£900
HAV/21UF/MNR/2025/0680
9. The Tribunal therefore decided that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under the terms of this assured tenancy was £900 per month.
10. The Tenant made no representation that the starting date for the new rent specified in the Landlord’s notice would cause the Tenant undue hardship.
11.
Accordingly, the Tribunal directed that the new rent of £900 per month should take effect from 6th May 2025 this being the date specified in the notice.
APPEAL PROVISIONS
These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any request for full reasons should be made within a month. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Market Rent for Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Market Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Monthly Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Market Rent for Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Market Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent as determined by the Tribunal.
- The tenant holds an assured periodic tenancy.
- The entitlement to fair market rent is clearly stated in the holding.
- The decision is consistently in favor of the tenant.
- The Tribunal's determination is final and binding.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The market rent for an assured periodic tenancy was set at £900 per month.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court reviewed comparable evidence and adjusted the rent to reflect the current state of the property.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988 section 14 was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument regarding the fair market rent based on comparable properties was crucial.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation may seek a determination of market rent through the First-tier Tribunal.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Comparable evidence and the state of the property were important.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, decisions like this can be appealed according to the appeal provisions outlined in the judgment.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent determinations.
